<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2762831450212540565</id><updated>2011-07-07T21:44:43.960-07:00</updated><title type='text'>TAKE HEED AFRICA</title><subtitle type='html'>…..contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints(Jude1:3).


Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels(Mark 8:36).</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>kizito Michael George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15869465479590651802</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>14</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2762831450212540565.post-3180403841738253692</id><published>2008-03-27T07:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-02-12T07:03:56.399-08:00</updated><title type='text'>TBN'S VOODOO JESUS AND VOODOO PREACHERS</title><content type='html'>&lt;strong&gt;"Who will rise up for me against the evildoers? or who will stand up for me against the workers of iniquity?" -Psalm 94:16&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ: Whose end is destruction, whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things.(Philippians 3: 18-19) &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them( I John 4:5)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;"Ye that love the LORD, hate evil..." -Psalm 97:10&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CALLED TO JUDGE&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2008/02/called-to-judge.html"&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2008/02/called-to-judge.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ROGER OAKLAND'S LETTER TO PAUL CROUCH REGARDING TBN PROMOTING ROMAN CATHOLIC DOGMA&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.understandthetimes.org/paulcrouchletter.shtml&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.calvarypo.org/pages/hands/0315.htm&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.calvarypo.org/pages/harchives.aspx?Cat=Miscellaneous &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;RESEARCH ON THE WORD FAITH "PROSPERITY GOSPEL" MOVEMENT&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Wolves/word_faith_movement.htm &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.cephasministry.com/evangelists_2.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BREAKING OF COVENANTS AND GENERATION CURSES: PROSPERITY VENON FROM THE PIT OF HELL IN AFRICAN BORN AGAIN CHURCHES &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2008/12/breaking-of-covenants-and-generation.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CAN YOU IMAGINE!!!: PASTOR ROBERT KAYANJA IS BRINGING BACK BENNY HINN(SIN) TO UGANDA IN June 2009 &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2008/11/can-you-imagine-pastor-robert-kayanja.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;THE PROSPERITY GOSPEL AND THE CAINIC REBELLIOUS SPIRIT &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2008/08/prosperity-gospel-and-cainic-rebellious.html   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Did Jesus Suffer in Hell? &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.geocities.com/cobblestoneministries/2005_CRM/DidJesusSufferInHell.html &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Transformations II, Political Christianity and False African&lt;br /&gt;Revivals&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Commentary/Comment37.htm &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;George Otis and his Fallacious Teachings&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.discernment-ministries.org/GeorgeOtisFallaciousTeachings.htm&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Imagine: Pastor John Mulinde joins hands with Sentinel group and Otis Jr. to spread lies about God centered revival in Uganda &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://worldtrumpetmission.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=2&amp;Itemid=27 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WHICH SIGNS ARE THESE?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.understandthetimes.org/commentary/c11.shtml&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;APOSTASY WATCH SITES &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://apostasy.cephasministry.com/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.cephasministry.com/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SHEPHERDS OR WOLVES &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.understandthetimes.org/commentary/c69.shtml&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.understandthetimes.org/commentary/commentaryro.shtml  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ICHABOD &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.understandthetimes.org/commentary/c71.shtml&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Laodicean American Church in Bed with another Lover    &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.cephas-library.com/church_n_state/church_n_state_us_loadicean_church_in_bed_with_another_lover.html &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.geocities.com/kmivule7/Article4.htm&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The False Todd Bentley Healing Revival in Florida&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs49.htm&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MUST READ:TODAY’S CHURCH: MAKING ZOMBIES OUT  OF CHRISTIANS &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.antipasministries.com/html/file0000168.htm&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THE GOD MEN AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.antipasministries.com/html/file0000208.htm&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;RICH WARREN AND HIS PURPOSE DRIVEN DECEPTION &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.safeguardyoursoul.com/html/rick_warren__purpose_driven_de.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Spiritual Politician Rick Warren takes his purpose driven lies to Mukono Christian University,Uganda &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2008/04/spiritual-politician-rick-warren-takes.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Africa's Worship of Benny Hinn the "Little Messiah"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs25.htm"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs25.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Benny Hinn: Quotes, False Teachings, False Prophecies&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs26.htm"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs26.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TBN'S FALSE TEACHERS, PROHETS AND APOSTLES&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.craom.net/articles.htm   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;INSIDE THE BLACK BUDGET : AMERICA, CHRISTIAN OR OCULT, If you look at the signs carefully you will understand  &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/01/science/01patc.html?_r=1&amp;8dpc&amp;oref=slogin&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THE FOUNDATIONS AND FALSE TEACHINGS OF KENNETH HAGIN AND KENNETH COPELAND  &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.takeheed.co.uk           &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WAIT A MINUTE: COMPARE RICK WARREN’S BOOK WITH THE IDEAS OF JUNG THE PAGAN PSYCHOLOGIST &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacredsandwich.com/warren_jung_chart.htm#warrenjung"&gt;http://www.sacredsandwich.com/warren_jung_chart.htm#warrenjung&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THE PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE”IS DANGEROUS“THE PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE”USES MARXIST IDEOLOGY AND LANGUAGE&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lorendavis.com/news_articles_pdl.html"&gt;http://www.lorendavis.com/news_articles_pdl.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rick Warren’s Purpose Driven Lies Exposed&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.abrahamic-faith.com/False-Teachers.html"&gt;http://www.abrahamic-faith.com/False-Teachers.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Spirit Led or Purpose driven&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cuttingedge.org/articles/db035.htm"&gt;http://www.cuttingedge.org/articles/db035.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CRITICAL RESOURCES ON RICK WARREN'S PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.christian-witness.org/docs/WarrenResources.doc&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;THE LAST DAYS of RICK WARREN, TIM LaHAYE &amp; HANK HANEGRAAFF &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.the-tribulation-network.com/dougkrieger/prophetic_sequence_pt23.htm&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;CHRISTIANITY BEGUN AS A PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH JESUS...BUT WHEN IT CAME TO AMERICA IT BECAME A BUSSINESS.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.the-tribulation-network.com/articles/hospital_for_sinners.htm&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.inplainsite.org/html/tele-evangelist_lifestyles.html#TBN%20Salari &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kenneth Copeland: Quotes, False Teachings, False Doctrines&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.afcministry.com/Kenneth_Copeland.htm"&gt;http://www.afcministry.com/Kenneth_Copeland.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.forgottenword.org/copeland.html"&gt;http://www.forgottenword.org/copeland.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kenneth Copeland exposed&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/kcopeland.html"&gt;http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/kcopeland.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Joyce Meyers Message On Being Born Again:&lt;br /&gt;Quotes, Teachings, Doctrines, Beliefs Concerning Salvation&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.afcministry.com/Joyce_Meyers.htm"&gt;http://www.afcministry.com/Joyce_Meyers.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Benny Hinn, Copeland , Dollar,  Joyce Meyer Under Senate  investigation &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.christianresearchservice.com/TelevangelistsSenateInvestigation.htm  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Joyce Meyer's $23,000 toilet a sign of prosperity?????&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/42538 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kenneth Hagin - False Prophet&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.discernment.org/wordfaith/haginfalse.htm"&gt;http://www.discernment.org/wordfaith/haginfalse.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.forgottenword.org/hagin.html"&gt;http://www.forgottenword.org/hagin.html&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PAULA WHITE SAYS JESUS IS NOT THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON OF SON, ACCORDING TO HER VOODOO GOSPEL WE SHOULD NOT PRAY TO JESUS &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.alittleleaven.com/2008/03/paula-whites-la.html    &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PENTECOST OR PLOTINUS &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.e-n.org.uk/p-980-Pentecost-or-Plotinus.htm  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;APOLOGETIC RESOURCES &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.apologeticsindex.org/w00.html &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:g-eerbuLXC4J:www.apologeticsindex.org/w00.html+pentecost+or+plotinus&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=1 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CREFLO DOLLAR’S VOODOO JESUS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs29.htm"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs29.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs14.htm"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs14.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs28.htm"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs28.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exposing the teachings of Copeland Creflo Dollar’s mentor &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.letusreason.org/Wf22.htm"&gt;http://www.letusreason.org/Wf22.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.letusreason.org/Wf21.htm"&gt;http://www.letusreason.org/Wf21.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kenneth Copeland false prophesy &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.letusreason.org/Wf19.htm"&gt;http://www.letusreason.org/Wf19.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Creflo Dollar and Joyce Meyer are serving the Devil together &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/word-faith.html#jmeyer"&gt;http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/word-faith.html#jmeyer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.factnet.org/discus/messages/3/12609.html?1141862514"&gt;http://www.factnet.org/discus/messages/3/12609.html?1141862514&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.factnet.org/discus/messages/3/1996.html?1143907347"&gt;http://www.factnet.org/discus/messages/3/1996.html?1143907347&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Joyce Meyer says what you say is what you get, word faith GM food &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wfial.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=resources.meyer&amp;amp;badUrl=http://www.wfial.org:80/resources/meyer"&gt;http://www.wfial.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=resources.meyer&amp;amp;badUrl=http://www.wfial.org:80/resources/meyer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hearts of fire for God but Minds on Ice &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2007/03/minds-on-fire-for-god-hearts-on-ice.html"&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2007/03/minds-on-fire-for-god-hearts-on-ice.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Africa Saints, Be Warned! Marilyn Hickey is a Heretic! &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs46.htm"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs46.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Daughter of Mammon Marilyn Hickey is coming to Kampala in March 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs45.htm"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs45.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2008/02/daughter-of-mammon-marilyn-hickey-is.html"&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2008/02/daughter-of-mammon-marilyn-hickey-is.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TBN Robert Kayanja's RIOT, A Rebellious Inverting Of Truth &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/Commentary/Comment64.htm"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Commentary/Comment64.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ecumenical deception:&lt;br /&gt;Rev. Fr. Expedito Magembe the Devil’s anointed one &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs22.htm"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs22.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;'Prosperity' Televangelists Probed for Possible Financial Misconduct&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.christianpost.com/article/20071107/29989_"&gt;http://www.christianpost.com/article/20071107/29989_&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What is Robert Schuller 'rethinking'?&lt;br /&gt;Crystal Cathedral conference accused of twisting biblical Christianity&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58405"&gt;http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58405&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO SHULLER &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.letusreason.org/Poptea1.htm   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SCHULLER ,BILLY GRAHAM AND ECUMENISM &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.seekgod.ca/deceptions.htm &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BILLY GRAHAM TELLS ROBERT SCHULLER HE BELIEVES PEOPLE CAN BE SAVED APART FROM JESUS CHRIST!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1141.cfm  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51461  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ROBERT SHULLER AND FREE MASONS &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;www.geocities.com/endtimedeception/robert.htm   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BILLY GRAHAM CATHOLICISM AND APOSTACY &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;www.jesus-is-lord.com/billy.htm  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;www.jesus-is-savior.com/Wolves/billy_graham-apostasy.htm  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=BILLY+GRAHAM+APOSTACY+&amp;btnG=Search  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MEET THE REAL BILLY GRAHAM &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.cephasministry.com/billy_graham_meet_the_real.html &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ROD PARSLEY’S VOODOO GOSPEL &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.pfo.org/parsley.htm &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.letusreason.org/Popteach7.htm &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;www.deceptioninthechurch.com/nextgnostic.htm  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FRED PRICE’S VOODO VENON &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.letusreason.org/Wf27.htm &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SODOMY IN UGANDA’S APOSTATE CHURCH&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs30.htm"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs30.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PASTOR AUGUSTINE YIGA: LUCIFERIAN OR BORN AGAIN&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2008/03/pastor-augustine-yiga-luciferian-or.html"&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2008/03/pastor-augustine-yiga-luciferian-or.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;History of the word faith movement &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.victorstephens.com/wordfaithmovementrev.pdf"&gt;http://www.victorstephens.com/wordfaithmovementrev.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Word of Faith Error &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.geocities.com/johnandursula/wordoffaitherror"&gt;http://www.geocities.com/johnandursula/wordoffaitherror&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exposing the word faith movement &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/word-faith.html"&gt;http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/word-faith.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;10 reasons to reject word faith theology of people like dollar&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Dollar’s word faith movement teaches that Jesus burned in hell, and was born again &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.intotruth.org/wof/moreno2.html"&gt;http://www.intotruth.org/wof/moreno2.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.intotruth.org/wof/moreno3.html"&gt;http://www.intotruth.org/wof/moreno3.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How the wealth, health Gospel twists scripture&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.watchman.org/reltop/health$.htm"&gt;http://www.watchman.org/reltop/health$.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.intotruth.org/wof/tract3.html"&gt;http://www.intotruth.org/wof/tract3.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rick Warren’s Spiritual Junk food&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://simplyagape.blogspot.com/2006_12_01_archive.html"&gt;http://simplyagape.blogspot.com/2006_12_01_archive.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;JESUISTS OATH EXPOSED &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.antichristconspiracy.com/PDFDocs/Antigospel.pdf"&gt;http://www.antichristconspiracy.com/PDFDocs/Antigospel.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Calvinism Examined&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.afcministry.com/Calvinism_Examined.htm"&gt;http://www.afcministry.com/Calvinism_Examined.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;ONCE SAVED ALWAYS SAVED NOSENSE EX&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;POSED &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2007/05/once-saved-always-saved-nosense-exposed.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;TOP TV and LIGHT HOUSE TELEVISION, TBN, God TV. And other apostate stations CAN NOT SHOW YOU THESE FILMS&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A MUST WATCH: END TIME REVIVALS UNMASKED&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.cuttingedge.org/videoroom.html     &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A MUST WATCH: THE GREAT GLOBAL APOSTATE CHURCH &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.cuttingedge.org/videoroom.html     &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A MUST WATCH :NEW VINE OR BABYLONIAN VINE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.christianreality.com/videos/vs-vid474.htm  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A MUST WATCH :MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://christiananswers.net/catalog/messages-vs.html   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MUST WATCH: GREED IS GOOD(GET FREE COPY NOW)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.antipasministries.com/dvd_order.htm &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A MUST WATCH: "You would think you walked into a mad house"&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.bible.ca/tongues-audio-video-documentation.htm&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Benny Hinn and Dr. Nasir Saddiki&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.salvacioneterna.com/nasir_siddiki.htm &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://phillyflash.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/dr-nassir-sidiki  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.wisdom-ministries.com&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2762831450212540565-3180403841738253692?l=takeheedafrica.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/feeds/3180403841738253692/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2762831450212540565&amp;postID=3180403841738253692' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/3180403841738253692'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/3180403841738253692'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/2008/03/tbns-voodoo-jesus-and-voodoo-preachers.html' title='TBN&apos;S VOODOO JESUS AND VOODOO PREACHERS'/><author><name>kizito Michael George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15869465479590651802</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2762831450212540565.post-2092943087099785711</id><published>2008-03-27T06:09:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-04-10T01:24:58.813-07:00</updated><title type='text'>ROME STILL CLAIMS TO BE THE ONE TRUE CHURCH</title><content type='html'>&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ANCIENT-FUTURE HERESIES(CAN WE RETURN TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH FATHERS?)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.thebereancall.org/node/6535&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rome Still Claims to be the&lt;br /&gt;One True Church&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Despite Four Decades of Ecumenism, Protestant Institutions are Not Churches, Says Rome&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;by Shaun Willcock&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.biblebasedministries.co.uk/2007/12/30/rome-still-claims-to-be-the-one-true-church/"&gt;http://www.biblebasedministries.co.uk/2007/12/30/rome-still-claims-to-be-the-one-true-church/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.biblebasedministries.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/the-one-true-church.doc"&gt;http://www.biblebasedministries.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/the-one-true-church.doc&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To the dismay of ecumenically-minded Protestants, the Roman pope, Benedict XVI, made it clear, in a document released in 2007, that the Roman Catholic institution is the “one, true Church”, and that Protestant institutions, not being in full communion with Rome, are not true churches.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The brief document was released on July 10, 2007, and was entitled “Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine on the Church.” It was put out by the Vatican’s “Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”. This office used to be called the Inquisition, and it should always be remembered that before he became pope, Benedict headed up this sinister institution. The document was approved by Benedict before publication; and it reaffirmed – note that it didn’t say this for the first time, it reaffirmed what Rome had in fact always said – that the Roman Catholic “Church” is the one, true Church founded by Jesus Christ. It did, however, concede that certain “elements of truth” can be found in other “churches” and “ecclesial communities”.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But what is the difference between “churches” and “ecclesial communities”? Was this simply a figure of speech? Not at all. The words were very carefully chosen. The document states that the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s used the term “church” in reference to the Eastern Orthodox institutions. The reason being that, although the Orthodox were separated from the Roman Catholic “Church”, they preserved the Popish doctrines and practices of apostolic succession, the ordained priesthood, and the eucharist. This, in Rome’s view, made them churches, although it went on to state that they “lack something in their condition as particular churches” because they are not in union with the pope of Rome.&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn1" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn1" name="_ednref1"&gt;[i]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Eastern Orthodox institutions, of course, are essentially the same as Rome when it comes to the doctrines and practices mentioned. They are false religious institutions just as certainly as Rome is, and not in any sense true churches of Christ according to the Scriptures. But they do not recognise the Roman pope as their head, and thus although they are churches in Rome’s judgment, they are deficient ones. And Rome, via the ecumenical movement, is working hard for them to see this deficiency, and once again acknowledge and accept the pope as their head, submitting to Papal authority.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the other hand, the “Christian communities” born out of the Protestant Reformation in the sixteenth century, says the document, do not have apostolic succession – the supposed unbroken succession of bishops going back to Peter, which Rome claims it alone enjoys – and therefore “cannot, according to Catholic doctrine, be called ‘Churches’ in the proper sense.”&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn2" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn2" name="_ednref2"&gt;[ii]&lt;/a&gt; This is why they are referred to as “ecclesial communities” instead.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course, neither the Roman Catholic institution nor the Protestant institutions engaged in seeking unity with Rome are true Christian churches! But the document reveals Rome’s true attitude towards spiritually blind, ecumenical Protestants who are so committed to establishing “unity” with Rome: its purpose has always been to place them all under itself, believing itself to be the “only true Church.” Yet they have naively pressed ahead with their ecumenical plans, believing Rome viewed them all as equals.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not surprisingly, the document caused ecumenical Protestant institutions to react with shock and dismay. For example, the general secretary of the World Alliance of Reformed Churches, Setri Nyomi, published an open letter addressed to the Vatican’s chief ecumenist, Roman Catholic cardinal Walter Kasper, president of the “Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity”. He wrote: “An exclusivist claim that identifies the Roman Catholic Church as the one church of Jesus Christ... goes against the spirit of our Christian calling toward oneness in Christ. It makes us question the seriousness with which the Roman Catholic Church takes its dialogue with the Reformed family and other families of the Church.”&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn3" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn3" name="_ednref3"&gt;[iii]&lt;/a&gt; And there was a similar reaction from various other Protestant institutions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Let us backtrack here, so as to put this latest document in its historical context. The official entry of the Roman Catholic institution into the ecumenical movement was the Second Vatican Council, or Vatican II, held from 1962 to 1965. And that council succeeded in deceiving the Protestant world into believing that Rome had somehow changed; that it no longer viewed itself as the only true Church; that it no longer wanted to persecute Protestants; and that it was open to working towards full unity between itself and all other “churches”, without insisting that it should control all others.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In one of the documents released at Vatican II, it was stated that the Church founded by Christ “subsists in the Catholic Church, governed by the successor of Peter and by the bishops in union with that successor”.&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn4" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn4" name="_ednref4"&gt;[iv]&lt;/a&gt; This was nothing less than the traditional Popish doctrine. But it added, for the first time, that elements of “sanctification and truth” are found outside the Roman Catholic institution’s visible structure.&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn5" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn5" name="_ednref5"&gt;[v]&lt;/a&gt; This was new! And it was statements like this that caused ecumenical Protestants to gibber with excitement. They now started to loudly proclaim that there was hope – that Rome had softened its stance, and opened the door to eventual full unity. How wrong they were! Rome never intended any such thing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the year 2000, the discussion over the term “churches” surfaced publicly, when the Inquisition – headed by the cardinal, Joseph Ratzinger – said that the term “sister churches” (as used since Vatican II) was being misused in ecumenical dialogue. And Ratzinger became pope upon the death of John Paul II a few years later.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the year 2000, the Inquisition released a document entitled “Dominus Iesus”, which caused an uproar among ecumenists at the time. It stated that the Roman Catholic institution was necessary to salvation. This of course has always been Rome’s doctrine, but again, it had been played down since Vatican II, to entice ecumenical Protestants. Played down, yes, but never abandoned – and when it was again categorically stated in 2000, ecumenical Protestants expressed shock and dismay.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hence this new document, released in 2007. According to the Inquisition’s prefect, Romish cardinal William Levada, it was released in response to the critical reactions to the teaching of the “Dominus Iesus” document, and to ongoing confusion over interpretations of the phrase “subsists in”:&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn6" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn6" name="_ednref6"&gt;[vi]&lt;/a&gt; that the Church of Christ “subsists in the Catholic Church”, as stated above.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This new document states that Vatican II did not, in fact, change Roman Catholic doctrine on the meaning of the Church! Its precise words are: “The Second Vatican Council neither changed nor intended to change this doctrine, rather it developed, deepened and more fully explained it.”&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn7" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn7" name="_ednref7"&gt;[vii]&lt;/a&gt; Nothing could be clearer. Roman Catholic cardinal, Walter Kasper, president of the “Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity”, said that although initial reactions to the document were marked by “irritation among Protestant Christians”, a second reading of the document should lead to the conclusion “that the document does not say anything new”, but rather provides a synthesis of Roman Catholic teaching.&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn8" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn8" name="_ednref8"&gt;[viii]&lt;/a&gt; In this he was quite correct – the document indeed does not say anything new. Rome has always stated that its doctrines were not changed at Vatican II.&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn9" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn9" name="_ednref9"&gt;[ix]&lt;/a&gt; And yet the belief has persisted among the Protestant institutions that Vatican II somehow represented an about-face by Rome; that it actually altered some of its fundamental doctrines. Rome never said so; but it was happy for the gullible to believe it. And believe it they certainly did! And for over forty years, the ecumenical movement has advanced by leaps and bounds, as foolish and blind Protestants have fallen over themselves in their mad rush for “unity” with Rome.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In answer to the question, “What is the meaning of the affirmation that the Church of Christ subsists in the Catholic Church?” the document states categorically, quoting from documents of Vatican II: “Christ ‘established here on earth’ only one Church and instituted it as a ‘visible and spiritual community’, that from its beginning and throughout the centuries has always existed and will always exist, and in which alone are found all the elements that Christ himself instituted.... This Church, constituted and organised in this world as a society, subsists in the Catholic Church, governed by the successor of Peter and the Bishops in communion with him.”&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn10" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn10" name="_ednref10"&gt;[x]&lt;/a&gt; There is nothing ambiguous about this, just as there was nothing ambiguous about what Vatican II stated: the only true “Church” is the Roman Catholic “Church”.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The document states that the use of the phrase “subsists in” was intended to show that all the elements instituted by Christ endure in the Roman Catholic “Church” alone. The “sanctifying elements” that exist outside the structure of the Roman Catholic “Church”, it states, can be used as instruments of salvation; but their value derives from the “fullness of grace and truth which has been entrusted to the Catholic Church”, quoting from Vatican II’s “Decree on Ecumenism”. In other words, any sanctifying elements within other religious communities are in some mysterious way derived from the Roman Catholic religion! Take heed to these quotations from the document:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;“It is possible, according to Catholic doctrine, to affirm correctly that the Church of Christ is present and operative in the churches and ecclesial Communities not yet fully in communion with the Catholic Church, on account of the elements of sanctification and truth that are present in them. Nevertheless, the word ‘subsists’ can only be attributed to the Catholic Church alone... and this ‘one’ Church subsists in the Catholic Church.” Note the words, “churches and ecclesial Communities not yet fully in communion with the Catholic Church”. Rome’s clear intention is that oneday, somehow, some way, all others will be in “communion” with it, for it alone is the one true Church.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;“The use of this expression [“subsists in’], which indicates the full identity of the Church of Christ with the Catholic Church, does not change the doctrine on the Church. Rather, it comes from and brings out more clearly the fact that there are ‘numerous elements of sanctification and of truth’ which are found outside her structure, but which ‘as gifts properly belonging to the Church of Christ, impel towards Catholic Unity.’” Think carefully about what is being stated here! As far as Rome is concerned, those elements which are good within other religious institutions must impel toward Catholic unity! Again, this demonstrates plainly that the “unity” Rome strives for is not a unity of equality, but a “unity” under Rome, a “unity” whereby what it believes to be inferior and defective religious institutions recognise the full authority of the Roman Catholic “Church” and submit to it!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to an authoritative commentary in the Vatican’s newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (the Inquisition) had acted to protect the unity and uniqueness of the Roman Catholic “Church” by issuing this document! Throughout the centuries, Rome has claimed to be the one, true Church, unique in every way. Gullible ecumenical Protestants thought that at Vatican II Rome cast aside centuries of doctrine and no longer made this claim. It did not! And now this document has again made it clear. Rome still believes itself to be the only true Church, to which the whole world must submit! In the words of the document itself, it took aim at the notion that the Church of Christ was “the sum total of the churches or the ecclesial communities”. Rome had never defined the Church this way. It always insisted that it alone was the truth, and that the ecumenical movement’s ultimate purpose was, not for Rome to join with all other churches in some kind of new set-up, but to get all other churches to submit to the pope, and to ultimately be absorbed by the “Church” of Rome. The Vatican newspaper stated that what Vatican II intended was to recognise ecclesial elements in non-Catholic communities. “It does not follow that the identification of the Church of Christ with the Catholic Church no longer holds”, it said.&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn11" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn11" name="_ednref11"&gt;[xi]&lt;/a&gt; Read that sentence again, and see how blind the Protestant ecumenicals have been for four decades, naively assuming that Rome wanted nothing more than for all churches to unite together on some kind of level playing field, as equal partners, with none above the others.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason for the issuing of this document is clear. Rome is still committed to ecumenism. But its purpose, in being involved in the ecumenical movement, is to finally take control of all other “churches! Absorption of all other “churches”, not equality with them, has always been Rome’s goal through the ecumenical movement. But as the ecumenical movement progressed over the years, it was becoming clear, to Rome, that this goal was being buried under the momentum of the ecumenical movement itself, which was treating all “churches” as equal and not, in general practice, leading to the kind of dominant position for Rome which it desires. This would never do. Not only was the ultimate goal not always being kept in mind, but increasingly, Roman Catholics themselves, being swept up in the ecumenical excitement, were losing their distinct sense of identity, and coming to view their “church” as just one of many churches in the world, instead of as “the Church” which their parents and grandparents had always been taught to believe it was. Something had to be done. This document marks a turning point. The pope of Rome has drawn a line in the sand: the Roman Catholic “Church” will pursue ecumenism, but only on its terms. All other “churches” must recognise the Roman Catholic “Church” as the one, true Church; this is the ultimate objective of the ecumenical movement, and on this point Rome will not budge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;U.S. Dominican priest, Augustine Di Noia, under-secretary of the Inquisition, said that the document does not call into question Benedict’s pledge to work for ecumenical progress. “The Church is not backtracking on its ecumenical commitment. But... it is fundamental to any kind of dialogue that the participants are clear about their own identity,” he said.&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn12" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn12" name="_ednref12"&gt;[xii]&lt;/a&gt; As stated by Robert Moynihan of Inside the Vatican magazine, “The Pope’s intent, it seems clear, is to lessen confusion in the Church, and at the same time to reinforce the sense of Catholic identity over against a type of exaggerated ecumenism in which all Christian communities are increasingly, in practice, regarded as equally valid expressions of Christian faith.”&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn13" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn13" name="_ednref13"&gt;[xiii]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In other words, Roman Catholics (and everyone else) must know that their “church” is the only true “church” on earth, and this fundamental doctrine must never be sacrificed for the cause of unity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Vatican newspaper, in its commentary on the document, said: “Despite the fact that this teaching has created no little distress in the communities concerned and even among some Catholics, it is nevertheless difficult to see how the title of ‘Church’ could possibly be attributed to them, given that they do not accept the theological notion of the Church in the Catholic sense and that they lack elements considered essential to the Catholic Church.”&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn14" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn14" name="_ednref14"&gt;[xiv]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Trying his best to put a good spin on it, while at the same time categorically stating Rome’s official position, Popish cardinal Walter Kasper said, “The document does not say that the Protestant churches are not churches, but that they are not churches in the precise sense, that is, they are not churches in the way that the Catholic Church uses the term ‘church’”.&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn15" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn15" name="_ednref15"&gt;[xv]&lt;/a&gt; Well, since the way in which Rome uses the word “church” is believed, by Rome, to be the only correct way to use it, no amount of spin will change the fact of the matter: that Rome is saying it alone is the true Church, and all others are false.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This has always been Rome’s belief. For a short while, so as to advance its own agenda, it covered up this “truth” which it had always proclaimed; but Benedict is far less of an “all things to all men” kinda guy than John Paul II was. And the present pope isn’t hiding this doctrine of Rome – he wants it spread abroad as far as possible, so that the world knows what Rome really believes on this point! For William Levada, the cardinal prefect of the Inquisition, asked the world’s Popish bishops to do all they can to promote and present the document to the wider public. There is nothing subtle or underhanded about this at all, and Benedict wants the world to be quite clear on this point: Rome is the one, true Church, and many others, with whom it has been in ecumenical dialogue for decades, must understand clearly that they cannot even be called “churches”, merely separated “communities”.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Incredibly, what we see is this: the Roman Catholic institution proudly and categorically stating that it alone is the one, true Church; and the ecumenical, cowardly, fawning “Protestant” institutions falling over themselves, as they have for decades, telling us all that the Roman Catholic institution is a true church, as much a true church as their own, that Roman Catholics are their brothers and sisters in Christ, true Christians, and that oneday full union would be achieved between Roman Catholic and Protestant institutions, all equally valid, all on the same level, all happily marching forward as Christians together.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And all this time, Rome had never altered its fundamental conviction. If only the ecumenical Protestants had paid attention, they would have noticed that Rome had not changed, and that it was only stating what it had always stated about itself – and about them.&lt;br /&gt;At least Rome is being honest, and true to its own doctrine. Protestants, tragically, are nowhere near as honest to their own written confessions of faith! According to the confessions of faith of many Protestant denominations, the pope of Rome is the Antichrist. This being so, they used to have no fellowship whatsoever with Papists, who they correctly understood to be idol-worshippers, false “christians”, not true Christians. But times have changed. The once-Protestant institutions have abandoned their own doctrinal standards, and are now fully prepared to receive Papists as true Christians, the pope of Rome as a brother in Christ, and the Roman Catholic institution (which they once branded correctly as the Whore of Babylon of Rev. 17) as a true Christian church. They have moved so far away from the Bible as the sole rule of faith, that they readily sprout such nonsense, even though the pope of Rome has officially declared they are not even churches in his eyes!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They register shock when Benedict simply states what has been Roman Catholic belief all along. Yet the ecumenical Protestants did not have the backbone, nor indeed the spiritual conviction, to have said from the very start of the ecumenical movement, “The Roman Catholic institution is not a true church, and there will be no unity with it.” The ecumenical Protestant attitude is well encapsulated in the words of Thomas Wipf, president of the Community of Protestant Churches in Europe: “We recognise the Roman Catholic Church as a church. It is and remains regrettable that this is not made possible the other way around.”&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn16" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn16" name="_ednref16"&gt;[xvi]&lt;/a&gt; They continue to recognise Rome, but Rome does not recognise them! How utterly naive and blind!&lt;br /&gt;The tragedy of all this is that neither the Roman Catholic institution, nor the Protestant institutions seeking unity with Rome, are true churches of Christ! They are both full of false, unbiblical doctrines and practices, and with wolves in sheep’s clothing in the pulpits and goats in the pews.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Will this latest bombshell from the Vatican put an end to the ecumenical Protestant obsession with seeking unity with Rome? No, it will not. The ecumenical movement is now too far advanced. Perhaps, if this latest document had been released three decades ago, it might have stopped the ecumenical bulldozer in its tracks. But not today. Rome evidently feels confident enough to release such a document now, without fear of it permanently stopping the ecumenical advance. This is why the Vatican’s chief ecumenist, the cardinal Walter Kasper, could make the statement that by clarifying its own position, the Vatican was actually helping ecumenical dialogue! He said that while initial reactions were marked by “irritation among Protestant Christians”, yet by explaining what still divides “Christians” the document “does not limit dialogue, but promotes it.” &lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn17" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_edn17" name="_ednref17"&gt;[xvii]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Protestant institutions have all been sufficiently weakened, doctrinally and practically. They have cast off their own confessional standards. They have cast aside various doctrines of the faith. They are filled with unregenerate men and women. They are floundering, rudderless, uncertain, shedding members, losing credibility. They are increasingly ripe for the picking by Rome.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;True Christian unity is a reality and always has been, because it is a spiritual unity between all true believers in Christ, and Christ Himself as their Head. This is what the Lord Jesus Christ prayed for (Jn. 17:20,21), and His prayer was answered, for His prayers were always answered (Jn. 11:41,42). “There is one body” (Eph. 4:4). All true Christians are united to Christ their Head, and form the one, united, mystical body of Christ, the true Church.&lt;br /&gt;The ecumenical movement is the attempt of worldly men, falsely professing to be “christians”, to create some kind of external, structural “unity” between false “churches”. The Papal Antichrist is doing his utmost to expand his territory and increase his power. From such a devilish “unity” all true Christians must remain absolutely separate (2 Cor. 6:14-18; Rev. 18:4,5).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;December 2007&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn1" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref1" name="_edn1"&gt;[i]&lt;/a&gt;.Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine of the Church, document of the “Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”, June 29, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn2" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref2" name="_edn2"&gt;[ii]&lt;/a&gt;.Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine of the Church.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn3" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref3" name="_edn3"&gt;[iii]&lt;/a&gt;.The Southern Cross, July 25 to 31, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn4" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref4" name="_edn4"&gt;[iv]&lt;/a&gt;.The Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium, 8.2.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn5" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref5" name="_edn5"&gt;[v]&lt;/a&gt;.The Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium, 8.2. Also the Encyclical Letter Ut unum sint, by John Paul II.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn6" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref6" name="_edn6"&gt;[vi]&lt;/a&gt;.The Southern Cross, July 18 to 24, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn7" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref7" name="_edn7"&gt;[vii]&lt;/a&gt;.Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine of the Church.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn8" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref8" name="_edn8"&gt;[viii]&lt;/a&gt;.The Southern Cross, July 25 to 31, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn9" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref9" name="_edn9"&gt;[ix]&lt;/a&gt;.e.g. Address of Paul VI, 29 September 1963; Address of Paul VI, 21 November 1964.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn10" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref10" name="_edn10"&gt;[x]&lt;/a&gt;.Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine of the Church.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn11" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref11" name="_edn11"&gt;[xi]&lt;/a&gt;.The Southern Cross, July 18 to 24, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn12" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref12" name="_edn12"&gt;[xii]&lt;/a&gt;.Vatican Congregation Reaffirms Truth, Oneness of Catholic Church, by John Thavis, Catholic News Service, as quoted in Pope Benedict Continues His “Benedictine Reform” by Stressing Catholic Identity, by Robert Moynihan, 10 July 2007. www.InsideTheVatican.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn13" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref13" name="_edn13"&gt;[xiii]&lt;/a&gt;.Pope Benedict Continues His “Benedictine Reform” by Stressing Catholic Identity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn14" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref14" name="_edn14"&gt;[xiv]&lt;/a&gt;.Vatican Congregation Reaffirms Truth, Oneness of Catholic Church.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn15" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref15" name="_edn15"&gt;[xv]&lt;/a&gt;.The Southern Cross, July 25 to 31, 2007&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn16" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref16" name="_edn16"&gt;[xvi]&lt;/a&gt;.The Southern Cross, July 25 to 31, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="" style="mso-endnote-id: edn17" href="http://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=2762831450212540565#_ednref17" name="_edn17"&gt;[xvii]&lt;/a&gt;.The Southern Cross, July 25 to 31, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Shaun Willcock is a minister of the Gospel, and lives in South Africa. He runs Bible Based Ministries. For other articles (which may be downloaded and printed), as well as details about his books, audio messages, pamphlets, etc., please visit the Bible Based Ministries website, or write to the address below. If you would like to be on Bible Based Ministries’ electronic mailing list, to receive all future articles, please send your details.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bible Based Ministries&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="mailto:info@biblebasedministries.co.uk"&gt;info@biblebasedministries.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.biblebasedministries.co.uk/"&gt;http://www.biblebasedministries.co.uk/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This article may be copied for free distribution if it is copied in full&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Contending for the Faith Ministries&lt;br /&gt;(Distributor for Bible Based Ministries)&lt;br /&gt;42055 Crestland Drive&lt;br /&gt;Lancaster, CA 93536&lt;br /&gt;USA&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ENDNOTES:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[1].Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine of the Church, document of the “Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith”, June 29, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;[1].Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine of the Church.&lt;br /&gt;[1].The Southern Cross, July 25 to 31, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;[1].The Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium, 8.2.&lt;br /&gt;[1].The Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium, 8.2. Also the Encyclical Letter Ut unum sint, by John Paul II.&lt;br /&gt;[1].The Southern Cross, July 18 to 24, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;[1].Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine of the Church.&lt;br /&gt;[1].The Southern Cross, July 25 to 31, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;[1].e.g. Address of Paul VI, 29 September 1963; Address of Paul VI, 21 November 1964.&lt;br /&gt;[1].Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine of the Church.&lt;br /&gt;[1].The Southern Cross, July 18 to 24, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;[1].Vatican Congregation Reaffirms Truth, Oneness of Catholic Church, by John Thavis, Catholic News Service, as quoted in Pope Benedict Continues His “Benedictine Reform” by Stressing Catholic Identity, by Robert Moynihan, 10 July 2007. www.InsideTheVatican.com&lt;br /&gt;[1].Pope Benedict Continues His “Benedictine Reform” by Stressing Catholic Identity.&lt;br /&gt;[1].Vatican Congregation Reaffirms Truth, Oneness of Catholic Church.&lt;br /&gt;[1].The Southern Cross, July 25 to 31, 2007&lt;br /&gt;[1].The Southern Cross, July 25 to 31, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;[1].The Southern Cross, July 25 to 31, 2007.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2762831450212540565-2092943087099785711?l=takeheedafrica.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/feeds/2092943087099785711/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2762831450212540565&amp;postID=2092943087099785711' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/2092943087099785711'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/2092943087099785711'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/2008/03/rome-still-claims-to-be-one-true-church.html' title='ROME STILL CLAIMS TO BE THE ONE TRUE CHURCH'/><author><name>kizito Michael George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15869465479590651802</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2762831450212540565.post-4295766049119323442</id><published>2008-03-26T03:29:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-02T07:49:21.814-07:00</updated><title type='text'>THE CRIMINAL HISTORY AND HERESIES OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM</title><content type='html'>&lt;strong&gt;Unmasking Catholicism&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.unmaskingcatholicism.com/Contents.shtml"&gt;http://www.unmaskingcatholicism.com/Contents.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Did The Catholic Church Give Us The Bible?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bible.ca/cath-bible-origin.htm"&gt;http://www.bible.ca/cath-bible-origin.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/ask/articles/rcc+bible001.asp?FROM=Catholicpage"&gt;http://www.chick.com/ask/articles/rcc+bible001.asp?FROM=Catholicpage&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THE ROMAN CHURCH'S DISPUTES WITH THE BIBLE &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lorendavis.com/news_articles_roman.html"&gt;http://www.lorendavis.com/news_articles_roman.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HAIL MARY HAIL SATAN &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Roman%20Catholicism/hail_mary_hail_satan.htm &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PAUL CROUCH'S TNB PROMOTING ROMAN CATHOLIC DOGMA&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.understandthetimes.org/paulcrouchletter.shtml&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2008/06/paul-crouchs-tbn-are-promoting-roman.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MOTHER TERESA'S LETTERS RECOUNT CRISIS OF FAITH &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.calvarypo.org/pages/hands/0480.htm&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MOTHER TERESA: A SERVANT OF SATAN AND THE ANTICHRIST &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/exposes/teresa/general.htm&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HERESIES OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2006/12/history-of-papacy-heresies-of-rome.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ANCIENT-FUTURE HERESIES(CAN WE RETURN TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH FATHERS?)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.thebereancall.org/node/6535&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Catholicism... Christian or Cult? &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.inplainsite.org/html/catholicism.html"&gt;http://www.inplainsite.org/html/catholicism.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;PROOF AIDS AND EBOLA WERE MANUFACTURED, DR.HOROWITZ&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2035439503178314656"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2035439503178314656&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Understanding Roman Catholicism &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/books/160/160cont.asp"&gt;http://www.chick.com/reading/books/160/160cont.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Inside the Catholic Catechism &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/cat-ndx.html"&gt;http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/cat-ndx.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WHAT EVERY CATHOLIC SHOULD KNOW??&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.erwm.com/CatholicIssues.htmhttp://whateverycatholicshouldknow.com/wecsk.htm"&gt;http://www.erwm.com/CatholicIssues.htmhttp://whateverycatholicshouldknow.com/wecsk.htm&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://bereanbeacon.org/"&gt;http://bereanbeacon.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SMOKE SCREENS&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/books/153/153intro.asp"&gt;http://www.chick.com/reading/books/153/153intro.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ALEXANDER HISLOP:THE TWO BABYLONS(SEE LINK WHORE OF BABYLON)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gospelgrace.com/"&gt;http://www.gospelgrace.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Fallacy of Catholicism's&lt;br /&gt;Papacy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.contenderministries.org/Catholicism/papalfallacy1.php"&gt;http://www.contenderministries.org/Catholicism/papalfallacy1.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Criminal History of the Papacy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/Papacy1.html"&gt;http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/Papacy1.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dogmas and Prospects of the papacy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/papacy/overview.htm"&gt;http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/papacy/overview.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THE TRUE FACE OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC INQUISITION -- ROTTEN SPIRITUAL FRUIT FROM THE ABYSS OF HELL &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1676.cfm"&gt;http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1676.cfm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Inquisition - A Pictorial History &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gospelgrace.com/romancatholicism/inquisition/inquisition.html"&gt;www.gospelgrace.com/romancatholicism/inquisition/inquisition.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Pope And The Roman Catholic Papacy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gospelgrace.com/romancatholicism/PopeAndPapacy.html"&gt;www.gospelgrace.com/romancatholicism/PopeAndPapacy.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ESCAPED CATHOLICS SAVED BY GRACE&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://hometown.aol.com/ecsbg/myhomepage/index.html"&gt;http://hometown.aol.com/ecsbg/myhomepage/index.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WHO OR WHAT IS THE ANTICHRIST? By Roderick C. Meredith&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tomorrowsworld.org/cgi-bin/tw/booklets/tw-bk.cgi?category=Booklets1&amp;amp;item=1104415262"&gt;http://www.tomorrowsworld.org/cgi-bin/tw/booklets/tw-bk.cgi?category=Booklets1&amp;amp;item=1104415262&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THE GREAT APOSTATE CHURCH, SEE POPE PRAY FOR PEACE WITH ANIMISTS, SNAKE WORSHIPPERS ETC&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cuttingedge.org/videoroom.html#ApCh"&gt;http://www.cuttingedge.org/videoroom.html#ApCh&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pope kisses Koran&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/popekiss.html"&gt;http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/popekiss.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sex crimes and the Vatican SEX CRIMES IN THE VATICAN The Vatican is fighting the video on its sex crimes, the video has been removed from google many times. Below are the various sites where you can watch it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WATCH SEX CRIMES IN THE VATICAN ON BBC IF NOT DELETED.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_5400000/newsid_5403100/5403158.stm?bw=bb&amp;amp;mp=rm"&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_5400000/newsid_5403100/5403158.stm?bw=bb&amp;amp;mp=rm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SEX CRIMES ALSO AVAILABLE HERE&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.jefound.org/2006/10/05/documentary-sex-crimes-and-the-vatican-implicates-pope-ratzinger-in-child-abuse-cover-up"&gt;http://www.jefound.org/2006/10/05/documentary-sex-crimes-and-the-vatican-implicates-pope-ratzinger-in-child-abuse-cover-up&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;YOU CAN ALSO WATCH SEX CRIMES HERE&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15190.htm"&gt;http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15190.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;OR HERE&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://dark-truth.blogspot.com/2007/01/sex-crimes-and-vatican.html"&gt;http://dark-truth.blogspot.com/2007/01/sex-crimes-and-vatican.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://bestdocumentaries.blogspot.com/2007/03/sex-crimes-and-vatican.html"&gt;http://bestdocumentaries.blogspot.com/2007/03/sex-crimes-and-vatican.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;READ ABOUT SEX CRIMES IN THE VATICAN&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sex crimes and the Vatican Transcript&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/panorama/5402928.stm"&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/panorama/5402928.stm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Confidential documents on Vatican sex crimes &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/28_09_06_Crimen_english.pdf"&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/28_09_06_Crimen_english.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interpretation of Document &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/panorama/5392338.stmhttp://www.oneinfour.org/press/sexcrimes"&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/panorama/5392338.stmhttp://www.oneinfour.org/press/sexcrimes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Clergy Abuse&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rickross.com/groups/clergy.html"&gt;http://www.rickross.com/groups/clergy.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;VATICAN ISLAM CONNECTION&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4762830765958178414&amp;amp;q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4762830765958178414&amp;amp;q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ROME CONTROLLS EVERY NATION UPON THE FACE OF THE EARTH&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4921233338865671404&amp;amp;q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4921233338865671404&amp;amp;q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HAVE YOU WATCHED MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN. THERE IS A CLAIM THAT THE CATHOLIC MARY IS GIVING MESSAGES TO THE CHURCH. SEE HOW THE MESSAGES FAIL TO PASS THE BIBLICAL TEST. JUST GO TO THE LINK BELOW AND CLICK WATCH ENTIRE VIDEO .PROTECT YOUR SELF AND YOUR LOVED ONES. GOD BLESS YOU.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://christiananswers.net/catalog/messages-vs.html"&gt;http://christiananswers.net/catalog/messages-vs.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Roman catholic Church:Past and Present &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=551463427654348280&amp;amp;q=Catholicism&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=551463427654348280&amp;amp;q=Catholicism&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WOMAN RIDING THE BEAST:DAVID HUNT&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5656543228879822494&amp;amp;q=Catholicism&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5656543228879822494&amp;amp;q=Catholicism&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exposing the ecumenical consipiracy of Rome&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sermonID=150717371"&gt;http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?sermonID=150717371&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ROME CONTROLS THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-47281780364293446&amp;amp;q=Prof.+veith&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-47281780364293446&amp;amp;q=Prof.+veith&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ROME AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4833316445096517757&amp;amp;q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4833316445096517757&amp;amp;q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Underground Christian net work&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sermonaudio.com/source_detail.asp?sourceid=musicalgardens"&gt;http://www.sermonaudio.com/source_detail.asp?sourceid=musicalgardens&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rome is behind secret societies, The Jesuits are the backbone of all secret societies&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3802649594045389359&amp;amp;q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3802649594045389359&amp;amp;q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8495372476179960226&amp;amp;q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8495372476179960226&amp;amp;q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FOX'S BOOK OF MARTYRS&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ccel.org/f/foxe/martyrs/home.html"&gt;http://www.ccel.org/f/foxe/martyrs/home.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.jesus.org.uk/vault/library/foxes_book_of_martyrs.pdf"&gt;http://www.jesus.org.uk/vault/library/foxes_book_of_martyrs.pdf&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www3.calvarychapel.com/library/foxe-john/text/bom.htm"&gt;http://www3.calvarychapel.com/library/foxe-john/text/bom.htm&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.biblebelievers.com/foxes/findex.htm"&gt;http://www.biblebelievers.com/foxes/findex.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Catholic Inquisition: The hidden bitter and real side of Rome The Catholic Inquisition and tools of torture &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=571538940742386630&amp;amp;q=the+catholic+inquisition&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=571538940742386630&amp;amp;q=the+catholic+inquisition&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rx8PdvOELvY"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rx8PdvOELvY&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Did the Inquisition Accomplish the goals of Rome, testimony by a former priest&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1220930449599880576&amp;amp;q=the+catholic+inquisition&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1220930449599880576&amp;amp;q=the+catholic+inquisition&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ERROS OF ROME&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ianpaisley.org/article.asp?ArtKey=mary2"&gt;http://www.ianpaisley.org/article.asp?ArtKey=mary2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Total Onslaught - 213 – Battle of the bibles&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1356136486318407242&amp;amp;q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1356136486318407242&amp;amp;q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;num=10&amp;amp;so=0&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;start=0"&gt;http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;num=10&amp;amp;so=0&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;start=0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;num=10&amp;amp;so=0&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;start=10"&gt;http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;num=10&amp;amp;so=0&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;start=10&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Roman Catholic cult&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/Cults/Catholicism"&gt;http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/Cults/Catholicism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Anti-Christ&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.antichristconspiracy.com/the_antichrist.htm"&gt;http://www.antichristconspiracy.com/the_antichrist.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;History of protestants&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.reformation.org/wylie2.html"&gt;http://www.reformation.org/wylie2.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;History of the papacy , heresies of Rome , scandals of the papacy The Papacy: Its History, Dogmas, Genius, and Prospects by Rev. J.A. Wylie, LL.D.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://jesus-is-lord.com/papacy/overview.htm"&gt;http://jesus-is-lord.com/papacy/overview.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wayoflife.org/papacy/00.htm"&gt;http://www.wayoflife.org/papacy/00.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Priest, The Woman and the confessional&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/chiniquy.htm"&gt;http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/chiniquy.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sister Charlotte Keckler and The Black Veil Part 1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5552482923569043893&amp;amp;q=Sex+crimes+and+the+Vatican%28VIDEO%29&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5552482923569043893&amp;amp;q=Sex+crimes+and+the+Vatican%28VIDEO%29&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6yDuxzjpxE"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6yDuxzjpxE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Hall of Church History&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/catholic.htm"&gt;http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/catholic.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bennet, An over view of history of the papacy. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bereanbeacon.org/articles/hist_overvw_papacy.htm"&gt;http://www.bereanbeacon.org/articles/hist_overvw_papacy.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;History of the papacy, Google video&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-520611150479939321"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-520611150479939321&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chick&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Alberto series&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/information/religions/catholicism"&gt;http://www.chick.com/information/religions/catholicism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alberto series&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/catalog/comiclist.asp#alberto"&gt;http://www.chick.com/catalog/comiclist.asp#alberto&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;VATICAN ASSSASSINS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5462018011643775425"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5462018011643775425&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.vaticanassassins.org/"&gt;http://www.vaticanassassins.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://whale.to/b/phelps2.html"&gt;http://whale.to/b/phelps2.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sex crimes and the Vatican(VIDEO)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_5400000/newsid_5403100/5403158.stm?bw=bb&amp;amp;mp=rm"&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_5400000/newsid_5403100/5403158.stm?bw=bb&amp;amp;mp=rm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5608788612031906158&amp;amp;q=Sex+crimes+and+the+Vatican%28VIDEO%29"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5608788612031906158&amp;amp;q=Sex+crimes+and+the+Vatican%28VIDEO%29&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/08/06/eveningnews/main566978.shtml"&gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/08/06/eveningnews/main566978.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Google videos COLLECTION SOME OF THE VIDEOS ON THIS LINK ARE NOT CHRISTIAN,SO BE DISCERNING &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.redicecreations.com/news/2006/08aug/goodoc2.html"&gt;http://www.redicecreations.com/news/2006/08aug/goodoc2.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;UNDERSTANDING ROMAN CATHOLICISM&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/books/160/160cont.asp"&gt;http://www.chick.com/reading/books/160/160cont.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;POPE KISSES KORAN&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/popekiss.html"&gt;http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/popekiss.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.pawcreek.org/wstream/ListOBDArchives.asp -listen on line&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/comics/0112/0112_allinone.asp.htm"&gt;http://www.chick.com/reading/comics/0112/0112_allinone.asp.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THE JUSUISIT PRIEST &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.craom.net/articles"&gt;http://www.craom.net/articles&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cephasministry.com/index_catholic_files.html"&gt;http://www.cephasministry.com/index_catholic_files.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Do not be deveived by the Psuedo split in catholic Church:There is a group that claims to be fighting from with in. They are arguing that the catholic church is the only source of salvation.Well, there is no salvation inside the Roman catholic cult do not be fooled.Every catholic who finds the truth must live this cult.This split group still holds to rosaries , scapulas, and the flawed argument that Mary is a Crusher of Heretics.WATCH VIDEOS, YOU WILL BE SHOCKED.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Catholics fighting from within, attack on Jews, protestants, Video 1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1551673167067628330&amp;amp;q=%22The+Great+Apostasy&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1551673167067628330&amp;amp;q=%22The+Great+Apostasy&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Catholics fighting from within, attack on Jews, protestants, Video 2&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;485267351425543383&amp;amp;q=%22The+Great+Apostasy&amp;amp;hl=e&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Richard Joseph Michael Ibranyi THE DECEIVER AND DECEIVED&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.johnthebaptist.us/sbw/default.htm"&gt;http://www.johnthebaptist.us/sbw/default.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The secrets of the Vatican&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7292917241920717553&amp;amp;q=The+vatican&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7292917241920717553&amp;amp;q=The+vatican&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AIDS Ebola were manufactured, DR.Leonard G. Horowitz&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.archive.org/stream/Proof_AIDS_and_Ebola_were_manufactured__Dr_LG_Horowitz_P2/Proof_AIDS_and_Ebola_were_manufactured__Dr_LG_Horowitz_P2_256kb.mp4"&gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/Proof_AIDS_and_Ebola_were_manufactured__Dr_LG_Horowitz_P2/Proof_AIDS_and_Ebola_were_manufactured__Dr_LG_Horowitz_P2_256kb.mp4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;VATICAN ISLAM CONNECTION&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4762830765958178414&amp;amp;q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4762830765958178414&amp;amp;q=veith%2C+Amazing+Discoveries&amp;amp;hl=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HOW THE VATICAN CREATED ISLAM&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.americanholocaust.50megs.com/The_Prophet.htm"&gt;http://www.americanholocaust.50megs.com/The_Prophet.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/reading/comics/0117/0117_allinone.asphttp://www.bible.ca/cath-bible-origin.htm"&gt;http://www.chick.com/reading/comics/0117/0117_allinone.asphttp://www.bible.ca/cath-bible-origin.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;is the catholic church the Author of the bible&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.bible.ca/cath-bible-origin.htm Roman catholiticism Christian or pagan&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why I left the catholic church &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bible.ca/cath-why-I-left.htm"&gt;http://www.bible.ca/cath-why-I-left.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Roman Catholicism in Theory and Practice&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.biblebelievers.com/misc_periodical_articles/mrw_001.html"&gt;http://www.biblebelievers.com/misc_periodical_articles/mrw_001.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;False Doctrines&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.biblebelievers.com/FalseDoctrine.html"&gt;http://www.biblebelievers.com/FalseDoctrine.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mother Teresa:was she a counterfeit&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.evangelicaloutreach.org/motherteresa.htm"&gt;http://www.evangelicaloutreach.org/motherteresa.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mother Teresa's House of Illusions&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.holysmoke.org/sdhok/shields.htm"&gt;http://www.holysmoke.org/sdhok/shields.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WAS MOTHER TERESA A TRUE CHRISTIAN?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/motherteresa.html"&gt;http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/motherteresa.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Pope's Push for a One-World Religion&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.reachingcatholics.org/pope.html"&gt;http://www.reachingcatholics.org/pope.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2762831450212540565-4295766049119323442?l=takeheedafrica.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/feeds/4295766049119323442/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2762831450212540565&amp;postID=4295766049119323442' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/4295766049119323442'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/4295766049119323442'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/2008/03/criminal-history-of-roman-catholicism.html' title='THE CRIMINAL HISTORY AND HERESIES OF ROMAN CATHOLICISM'/><author><name>kizito Michael George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15869465479590651802</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2762831450212540565.post-2303561698544225505</id><published>2008-03-26T03:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-05-23T05:30:53.624-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Uganda's Rotten Prosperity Movement</title><content type='html'>&lt;strong&gt;Uganda's Rotten Prosperity Movement, Very Unchristian &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Commentary By Kato Mivule&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sept 19 2006&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/Commentary/Comment52.htm"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Commentary/Comment52.htm&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.monitor.co.ug/sunday/life/life091710.php"&gt;Is Pastor Robert Kayanja's Christianity Christian?.&lt;/a&gt;..Monitor&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;&lt;a href="http://allafrica.com/stories/200608290365.html"&gt;Smuggled Wine Held at TBN's Televangelist Million Dollar Home in Africa...All Africa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.kayanja.org/?jc=wine.saga.home"&gt;TBN Televangelist refutes Wine Saga...defends "Prosperity" Teaching&lt;/a&gt;...Kayanja.org&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;&lt;a href="http://allafrica.com/stories/200608300910.html"&gt;When Evil Turns Water Into Wine...Monitor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;Africa's &lt;a href="http://www.timesnews.co.ke/06nov05/magazine/magazine3.html"&gt;TBN&lt;/a&gt; Preacher is &lt;a href="http://www.ugandaobserver.com/new/archives/2004arch/easy/family/apr/fam200404154.php"&gt;"Renown"&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Crisis (actually a shaking) is happening in Uganda as the main leaders of the Prosperity Movement are having almost daily appearances in the local press concerning their wealth, greed, materialism, and misrepresentation of Jesus Christ...most notably is one preacher who is a &lt;a href="http://www.tbn.org/about/newsletter/index.php/617.html"&gt;darling of TBN TV&lt;/a&gt; and recently 'smugglers' managed to 'use' his highly secure million dollar house in Africa to smuggle top world class wines into the country...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When responding to his critics concerning his wealth, this preacher told them "to mind their own business"...I will have more on this topic soon...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I recently wrote a pastor of a &lt;a href="http://www.victoryuganda.org/passover.htm"&gt;Mega Church with a powerful FM Radio ministry&lt;/a&gt; in Kampala concerning the Apostasy and Greed taking place in mainly Kampala Churches , I warned him about the coming judgment as stipulated in scripture and that it begins in God's House, and the Call to Repentance...This "pastor" responded to me that I was only "self-conceited"...this same "pastor" claims blindly that "&lt;a href="http://www.victoryuganda.org/passover.htm"&gt;revival&lt;/a&gt;" is happening in Uganda...well, now the Chickens come home to roast...I am not rejoicing over this but saddened and grieved because of the rebellion of such "pastors" (Oh, maybe 'imposters') today against God's Word to which we hold ourselves accountable...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most of this prosperity movement is a mirror of the rotten and stinking prosperity and political Christian movement of the West...The So-called Christian Right and their bogus "Christian" agendas...Pastors leave Africa and go and beg these imposters who purport to be Christian men in the West and in exchange they return to Africa spreading Western Christianity or Political Christian Dominionism and the expansion of the American Hegemony...The world clearly sees this, those who are not born again see that this is not the Jesus Christ of the Bible and something is wrong...they are right.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just as the Prosperity Movement in the West is very Political, i.e. folks like Pat Robertson and John Hagee, so is the Prosperity Movement in Uganda, it is so politically involved with the state and such is the unholy alliance between Church and State...we see preachers who claim to have access to the State House (Uganda's Equivalent of the White House) more often they desire than any Minister, or MP (Senator)...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These folks don't worship the True Jesus Christ of The Bible, they worship the god of Mammon and the god of political power, they are imposters, thieves, robbers and have turned God's House into a political den of thieves and robbers...avoid such folks...to these guys, godliness is a means of gain...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jesus Christ and the Apostles foretold of the great falling away or the Apostasy that would happen at the end of age and Africa has not been immune to it courtesy of so-called western missionaries, bogus and greedy Western Televangelists parading so-called Christian TVs like TBN, and now infamous conmen pretending to be "anointed" preachers of mega churches in Kampala (Uganda's Capital) here in Africa....There is still a chance for forgiveness before The Lord and He is calling on you all preachers who are in this "prosperity" movement to REPENT least you perish! I will have more on this soon...Kato Mivule&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Prosperity Gospel - A Gospel Of The Antichrist&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Kato Mivule&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/Commentary/Comment53.htm"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Commentary/Comment53.htm&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;October 8, 2006&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1 John 4:1-6&lt;br /&gt;(1) Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.&lt;br /&gt;(2) Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:&lt;br /&gt;(3) And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.&lt;br /&gt;(4) Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.&lt;br /&gt;(5) They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them.&lt;br /&gt;(6) We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Every spirit that confesses not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh...this is the spirit of the Antichrist... However, the 'confess that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh' is not a mere outside mouth confession or a religious confession in church but an acknowledgment, realization, submission to The Lordship of Jesus Christ in our personal life and from the heart to the fact that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh...that He reigns as Lord in our personal lives.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1 John 4:2&lt;br /&gt;(2) Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is the recognition, realization, submission, and obedience to the Life, Authority, Power, Lordship, Command, Word of God, and Life of Suffering, of Jesus Christ. So, this is not just mere confession on the outside that “Jesus Christ is come in the flesh” yet when one’s life and heart are totally contrary to the ‘Life of Jesus Christ in the Flesh’.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;'Confess' in Greek...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;G3670&lt;br /&gt;ὁμολογέω&lt;br /&gt;homologeō&lt;br /&gt;hom-ol-og-eh'-o&lt;br /&gt;From a compound of the base of G3674 and G3056; to assent, that is, covenant, acknowledge: - con- (pro-) fess, confession is made, give thanks, promise.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, the Greek word that John used here ‘confess’ is ‘homologeo’ meaning…&lt;br /&gt;·         To Assent...&lt;br /&gt;·         Covenant…&lt;br /&gt;·         Acknowledge…&lt;br /&gt;·         Confess…&lt;br /&gt;·         Give Thanks…&lt;br /&gt;So, the verse above speaks about not only confessing the that 'Christ Jesus is come in the flesh' but obeying Jesus Christ and living the life of Jesus Christ in us. Just as Christ Jesus walked in the flesh, so we follow His example and we too walk a life that is dead to this world, sin and evil and live the life of Jesus Christ in us.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This means total obedience to the commands of Jesus Christ in us. It means dying to the things of the world and the pleasures of the world. It means carrying our cross and following Jesus Christ daily.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If we Confess, Acknowledge, Realize, Covenant, Assent that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh, then we live that life of suffering just as Jesus Christ suffered, we live the life of the cross, we then love the things Jesus Christ loves and hate what He hates. This means not being a friend of the world and not loving the things that are in the world. It means 100% obedience to Christ Jesus regardless of the price and cost, even if it means our very lives.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1 John 4:3&lt;br /&gt;(3) And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Antichrist spirit confesses not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh...this is a spirit of rebellion that does not realize, acknowledge, submit to the Lordship and Life of Jesus Christ. This Antichrist spirit submits to the things of the world, to the life and lordship of the world, riches, materialism, silver, gold, and submission to man.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The deceptiveness about this Antichrist spirit is it's characteristic of hypocrisy; religious Christians in this category merely “confess” that Jesus Christ is Lord and that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh but they do not obey the commands of The Lord...they merely say Lord, Lord but don't do the things The Lord commands...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Matthew 7:19-23&lt;br /&gt;(19) Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.&lt;br /&gt;(20) Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.&lt;br /&gt;(21) Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.&lt;br /&gt;(22) Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?&lt;br /&gt;(23) And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is interesting to note that the ‘Confess Jesus Christ is come in the flesh’ is in present tense and not past. Christ Jesus dwells in those who obey his commands, those who love Him, His saints, His True Church…and in Him we live, move, and have our being.&lt;br /&gt;Acts 17:28&lt;br /&gt;(28) For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;'Is come' in Greek...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;G2064&lt;br /&gt;ἔρχομαι&lt;br /&gt;erchomai&lt;br /&gt;er'-khom-ahee&lt;br /&gt;Middle voice of a primary verb (used only in the present and imperfect tenses, the others being supplied by a kindred [middle voice] word, ἐλεύθομαι eleuthomai or ἔλθω elthō; which do not otherwise occur); to come or go (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively): - accompany, appear, bring, come enter, fall out, go, grow, X light, X next, pass, resort, be set.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, the 'Is Come' in Greek is 'erchomai' generally meaning here...&lt;br /&gt;·         Accompany&lt;br /&gt;·         Appear&lt;br /&gt;·         Bring&lt;br /&gt;·         Come&lt;br /&gt;·         Enter&lt;br /&gt;·         Fall Out&lt;br /&gt;·         Go&lt;br /&gt;·         Grow&lt;br /&gt;The life we live, we live in Christ Jesus and Jesus Christ in us. We don't live on our own but submit to His will and obey His commandments. Such a life is a life of the Cross, it is not a life of pleasures of this world as the Prosperity preachers desire us to believe.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Galatians 2:20&lt;br /&gt;(20) I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If Christ Jesus lives in us then we shall follow after His leading and example and not conform to the standards of this world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For Jesus Christ is the same yesterday today and forever…as He walked, so does He still walk, and so will He walk and even so we ought to walk after His likeness and character...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jesus Christ was not parading around in the best SUV, Corporate Jet, designer clothing, million dollar houses, fat bank accounts, expensive vacations and cruises...Jesus Christ lived a simple life, a life that was not attached to the riches of this world and not a friend to the powerful and the elite. Jesus Christ reached out to the sinners, sick and the poor of His day and so must we if Christ Jesus truly dwells in us and if we truly confess that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;James 4:4-5&lt;br /&gt;(4) Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.&lt;br /&gt;(5) Do ye think that the scripture saith in vain, The spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Prosperity Preachers always speak about terms like 'increase', 'going to the next level', 'being fruitful', 'divine favor in the world and business', financial increase, influence...and many other blasphemous terms...what the Prosperity teachers are doing is conforming Christian to the world and submission to man...this is the spirit of the Antichrist that 'Confesses not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh'...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Brothers and Sisters be forewarned that friendship with the world makes you an enemy of God. Those preachers who seduce you to such philosophies are liars and wolves in sheepskin seeking only to destroy your faith in Christ Jesus.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now, many prosperity preachers argue that they also take care of the poor, orphans and help the sick but this is just Hypocrisy 101; these greedy preachers simply throw money in orphanages and pretend to help the poor not because they love to but because they seek to use the poverty of the poor for their own gain...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They get more donations when they show pictures of the poor to their donors...they pretend to preach the gospel but what they preach is heresy...their care for the poor is nothing but pure hypocrisy...they are like the IMF and World Bank “giving” Africans “Grants” which they expect Africans to repay somehow somewhere sometime in the future back to the world's elite Bankers - IMF and World Bank.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;John 15:4&lt;br /&gt;(4) Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hebrews 13:8&lt;br /&gt;(8) Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1 John 2:6&lt;br /&gt;(6) He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, we understand that the “confess that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh” has to do with our total obedience to Jesus Christ, abiding in Him, He abiding in us and them we as a must, walking even as Jesus Christ walked…&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We now understand that we must bear fruit and that fruit is the Life, character and likeness of Jesus Christ in us…walking just as He walked…acknowledging that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh…He abides in us even to this day, therefore His character and likeness is not just historical and past and irrelevant as the world says but is and must be manifest in us today…&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, we take a moment and ask our selves, did Jesus Christ live a life of materialism, worldliness, greed, sin, hate, murder, jealousy, political Christianity?…which things, sad to say is what many Christians are walking in today blinded by foolish pastors and so-called apostles (actually apostates) who are busy committing adultery with the world and loving the things of the world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1 John 2:15-18&lt;br /&gt;(15) Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.&lt;br /&gt;(16) For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.&lt;br /&gt;(17) And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.&lt;br /&gt;(18) Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The spirit of the Antichrist is that which causes men to love the world and hate Christ and become enemies of God. Brothers and Sisters, let us watch and be very careful, today's prosperity preachers are agents of the Antichrist regardless of if they know it or not...the gospel of prosperity, riches and materialism is one that conforms Christians to the standards of this world while hypocritically using The Name of Jesus Christ.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now, you CANNOT love Jesus Christ and at the same time love the things of the world such as materialism, posh cars first class air travel, the best cars – SUVs, Gulf Stream Jets, Million Dollar houses, huge dollar bank accounts, fame, upper class neighborhoods, the rich, powerful politicians and so forth…all best the world can give…&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The prosperity gospel conforms people to love the things of this world and as such makes Christians friends with this world and as such they become enemies of God.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You cannot love such and think that you are abiding in Christ Jesus…those who think in such a way are hoodwinked and bewitched by Satan himself…and such is the prosperity doctrine and purpose driven life of lies and a life outside Jesus Christ.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Those who live in such lies called “prosperity gospel” will never be fruitful with The Life of Jesus Christ in them…they will never ‘Confess, acknowledge, realize, assent, covenant, that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh’; they will always say that “Jesus Christ CAME in the flesh”…such is the spirit of the Antichrist…the spirit of the world and love for the things of the world…the spirit that rejects continual submission to the Lordship, Character, and Likeness of Jesus Christ.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1 John 2:15-19&lt;br /&gt;(15) Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.&lt;br /&gt;(16) For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.&lt;br /&gt;(17) And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.&lt;br /&gt;(18) Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.&lt;br /&gt;(19) They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Antichrist spirit is very much connected to the love of the world and things of the world...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Those who love the world and the things of the world have no love of the Father in them… These are they that refuse to ‘confess, acknowledge, and assent that Jesus Christ IS COME in the flesh’; they refuse the Lordship and Life of Christ Jesus in their personal lives…&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such is the Prosperity Movement…this Movement is one that promises Christians riches here on earth and the best of the world here in this dying world that is certainly passing away. The prosperity movement is one that subtly indoctrinates its believers to love the world and the things of the world and in the process, they do away with the Love of The Father and ‘Confess Not that Jesus Christ IS COME in the flesh’…this is a movement of rebellion and as such it is an Antichrist Movement.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sad to note is the fact that many churches here in Africa are being swept by this diabolical movement called the prosperity and purpose driven movement… TBN TV is the greatest dispenser of this World Love prosperity and purpose driven venom from the Antichrist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I sometimes wonder why these TBN guys don’t stop their broadcasts here in Africa…we don’t need such venom, we are tired of it and please TBN keep your Antichrist programming to yourself. We shall have our bibles, those will be enough for us.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We are tired of such lies like “Enjoying Everyday Life” with Joyce Meyer, not forgetting Benn Hinn’s Jet purchase campaigns…&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Benn Hinn says that we should give him money so he can buy a new plane and that we so send him to preach the gospel around the world…we are tired of such lies, we don’t see Jesus Christ in such, we don’t see, His character and likeness in such preachers but greed, materialism, covetousness, merchandising and selling of all those small idols Benn Hinn loves to call gifts for the price of donations from his viewers, and sure enough this is an Antichrist spirit!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sad and so sad is the fact that the ‘emperor walks naked’ and does not even realize it…the TBN promotion of such filth around the world is such and simply a walking naked emperor here on Africa’s airwaves.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Revelation 3:17-18&lt;br /&gt;(17) Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:&lt;br /&gt;(18) I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What amazes me is the fact that despite heavy criticism against the prosperity movement and its preachers, many of them still continue to stubbornly preach this Antichrist Gospel of riches, fame, ‘getting to the next level’ “being fruitful” which is nothing other than love for the world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Brethren, truly this is the last hour just as The Lord Jesus Christ and the Apostles warned us 2000 years ago about the great deception that would happen prior to The Lord's Second coming.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The storms of deception are blowing left and right and against the people of God, those who call themselves after the name of The Lord.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Deception is so rampant that Pastors of churches and Christians are giving themselves over to the overt love for the things of the world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The deception is packaged to seduce Christians in accepting a “good” life in the world. They are promised the 'best in the world' if they 'saw' seeds of faith... The talk in Christendom these days is about being “fruitful” and getting to the “next level” but the fruitfulness spoken about by these imposters who pretend to be pastors is all about getting more influence, materialism, riches and money in the world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The “next level” that these false apostles speak about is all about “getting to the next level” in the social ladders of the affluent societies...this is the gospel of elitism and it only leads towards destruction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sad it is to say that the greatest proponents today are the Western Preachers and Pastors, almost 99 per cent of TBN TV is about the promotion for love of the world and the things of the world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We in Africa are daily being bombarded by the false teachings on TBN about a “good life”, “being fruitful”, and “ getting to the next level” by mainly American preachers and America-nized preachers...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When one turns on Christian TV, all you see and hear is a gospel that speaks not about the cross of Jesus Christ but about “making it in life”, all we hear constantly is the heresy and error by such speakers as Joyce Meyer, and not to mention Kenneth Copeland and his “Faith” programs...all these guys do is speak about being conformed to the world...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Brethren, those who want blunt discernment concerning TBN TV, here is it...this is a TV that promotes a false gospel, another gospel, a gospel of the Antichrist, a gospel that conforms believers to love the world and to get justification from man. Yes, regardless of how many innocent and sincere preachers are on this TV, they have been blinded by the god of this world and to seduce and deceive believers in loving the world while hypocritically singing the Name of Jesus Christ.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These are the last days and the Antichrist does not come dressed in Halloween attire, the Antichrist comes  dressed in business attire - in a corporate suit and a briefcase full of 100  US Dollars bill notes, credit and debit cards, with a brand new SUV, flies in a personal corporate Gulf Stream jet, being welcomed on pulpits every Sunday, and having his programs aired across the world on "Christian TV", while promising millions peace,  prosperity, and a good life here on earth...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is no wonder that his (antichrist) gospel connects well with the elite political establishment; they are all seeking peace and prosperity...and the establishment know that what some “Christians” need today is just money and 'making it in life', the very thing the Antichrist is willing to offer in his peace and prosperity initiatives...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1 Timothy 6:3-10&lt;br /&gt;(3) If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness;&lt;br /&gt;(4) He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings,&lt;br /&gt;(5) Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.&lt;br /&gt;(6) But godliness with contentment is great gain.&lt;br /&gt;(7) For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out.&lt;br /&gt;(8) And having food and raiment let us be therewith content.&lt;br /&gt;(9) But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.&lt;br /&gt;(10) For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the love of money is the source of all evil...don't be deceived, you cannot serve Jesus Christ and at the same time serve money...the prosperity preachers are liars and deceivers who desire us to believe that we can love Jesus Christ and money at the same time...those who heed these wolves who love to call themselves prosperity teachers and 'enjoying everyday life' preachers are doomed for destruction...brethren, repent!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Brethren, come out from such, be separate and The Lord will receive you...Amen&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Revelation 18:4&lt;br /&gt;(4) And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2 Corinthians 6:14-18&lt;br /&gt;(14) Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?&lt;br /&gt;(15) And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?&lt;br /&gt;(16) And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.&lt;br /&gt;(17) Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you,&lt;br /&gt;(18) And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In Christ Jesus&lt;br /&gt;Kato Mivule&lt;br /&gt;Uganda, Africa&lt;br /&gt;&lt;kmivule7@yahoo.com&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;America-nized Christianity, ‘Another Gospel’ To Africa&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Kato Mivule&lt;br /&gt;October 10, 2005&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Commentary/Comment33.htm  &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Galatians 1:3-12&lt;br /&gt;3 Grace be to you and peace from God the Father, and from our Lord Jesus Christ, 4 Who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil world, according to the will of God and our Father: 5 To whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen. 6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. 8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. 10 For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ. 11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. 12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;God Knows The True Western Humble Servants to Africa...&lt;br /&gt;It is with a great burden and sorrow, filled with brokenness that I write this article. I would like to clear the air by first acknowledging all the hundreds of Western humble servants of Christ Jesus who out of Love for Him from a pure heart with no strings associated, have laid down their lives for the brethren in Africa. I would say with all humility, that my prayers are with them constantly that you will continue in this good work, standing on God’s True Holy Word and pointing all men to nothing but Jesus Christ who alone is able to save. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;These Western Christians have sacrificed all they have to see that the gospel is preached in Truth to this continent that once hosted Jesus Christ in His young days while He and His earthly parents, Joseph and Mary sought refuge and exiled in Egypt. I do sincerely appreciate all their efforts and I am not blind about them. As I have written before, God truly will reward this unknown men and women of God from The West who have denied themselves earthly pleasures and delicacies to have the True Gospel preached in Africa. Please keep them in your prayers and do support them.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Having said that however, this will not blind me from the deceit and hypocrisy that is blinding the peoples of Africa and especially in Uganda where I grew up; this deceit and hypocrisy being spread overtly and subtly by American Apostate Christianity with the power and anointing from their god called mammon. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I find it very difficult to explain to many Africans that the current gospel they are receiving is one from the main stream Apostate Laodicean American Church that worships, Man and Mammon; a Babylonian Mammon or Money gospel with very dare end time implications that will lead these Christians to worship the Beast and his system. However, someone will have to stand and speak Truth. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Un-Schooling, Un-Learning Westernized Christianity…&lt;br /&gt;It is time to return to the True Gospel of Jesus Christ with no strings attached. It is time to return to The Gospel of Salvation, Holiness, Purity, Simple Lifestyle and not the Western Gospel of Man, Money, Riches, Materialism all in the name of a Purpose Driven Prosperity Gospel. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;It is sad that Africa has been blanketed by a TBN False gospel of lies and prosperity overtly while the Rick Warren deceit from hell of a Purpose Driven life spreads subtly in Africa’s wealthy and Urban core. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;For this reason, there is a big need to un-school and un-learn what we have been taught by liars and pranks who purport to be bible teachers and missionaries in Africa. It is a time to unplug from the Western Christian Mindset and return back to Simple Bible Truth and walk as the Disciples and Apostles walked in the Book of Acts in this evil last days. The Best Manual we can have in Africa is a Bible and not Bible Colleges, Multi-Million Dollar Churches, and Designer Suit dressed thugs who call themselves men of God.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I won’t keep silent – won’t be threatened…&lt;br /&gt;It is from this point that I cannot keep silent and watch as my fellow brethren in Africa are swept away by the lies and deceit streaming from Lucifer Himself. The Leadership in Africa is partly to blame for turning a blind eye to the Word of God and Truth for money and accolades awarded to them from the Apostate Laodicean Church in America.  It is my prayer that God will raise new leaders in Africa. Current leadership has TOTALLY failed and has been ‘bought’ by the Apostate Church of America. They are guilty for exchanging God’s Truth for Money and Accolades. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Because of the extreme poverty and need, African brethren become vulnerable to believing that every thing said and done in The West by American Christians is true and lines up to sound biblical doctrine. There is a lack of sound biblical based critical thinking and often those who arise to challenge the authenticity of the status quo are often maligned and excommunicated and denied fellowship.  &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The Village Chief Mentality…&lt;br /&gt;This is mainly due to a cultural belief in most if not all African Cultures of never questioning ‘The Village Chief’. Village Chiefs were and are still a very strong authority widely respected in African Cultures. While I have great honor and respect that my African culture taught me in regards to respecting the elderly…which I appreciate so much when placed in perspective to the Western degrading of the elderly to nursing homes, however, we are all personally responsible for the accountability of our personal lives before God. Every one will stand to give account on their own…the Village Chief will too stand to give account for their actions. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The Pastors and leaders in many African Churches have taken on the mantle of a ‘Village Chief’ because of their growing affluence and power, often supplied by Western Preachers who also play usury so as to report ‘Big Numbers of Converts’ to their denominational headquarters in the USA and in return the blind undiscerning American Christians drunk with stupor, fill the offertories of these supposedly ‘missiologists’ who have done such a “great job of winning souls to Jesus Christ”…mammon becomes a factor in such events...  Such duplicity certainly waters down the True Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. The ‘Village Chief’ mentality has succeeded in turning true ministers of God into dictators, controllers, and manipulators with sponsorship from the American Laodicean Church that cements their legitimacy. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Divide and Rule NWO Hegelian Dialectics…&lt;br /&gt;No wonder it has always been a Hegelian Dialectic principle of the New World Order to Divide and Rule. The Christian Dominations of the West have played this game over and over again. Instead of preaching Jesus Christ they have promoted a false Gospel of denominationalism. You have the Baptists, Presbyterians, Methodists, Charismatics, and Pentecostals; all rushing to get as many converts for themselves and not Jesus Christ. As such American Denominational Christianity has failed greatly in Africa and is just a tool and program for the New World Order to Control and Manipulate Africans and removing Africa’s Religious and Spiritual independence.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The greatest historical lie is that the gospel spread to Africa in the late 1600s, this is a lie and a re-writing of History because the Bible itself disapproves that with the account of Philip and the Ethiopian Eunuch. Countless references in the Old Testament books show the interaction of Africa and Israel; obviously the rulers and cultures of Africa were not blind to The God of Israel… Africa has never been a dark continent as reported by so-called western missionaries who came to exert control and lay ground for a one-world government. It is these political dominion Christian missionaries that were blind and saw darkness in the continent and sadly enough we see their seed arise again preaching Dominion Christianity again through the likes of Rick Warren Purpose Driven Doctrines, TBN Putrid Prosperity Churchianity and False Patriotism Evangelicalism. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;New World Order Mind Control and Programming Africa…&lt;br /&gt;So, Africa has suffered divide and rule at the hands of Western Missionaries who have sadly been programmed and Mind Controlled by the New World Order to setup ground for a one world religion and one world government… A 21-century scramble for Africa is under way because of her resources such as Oil, as such The American New World Order sees if fit to manipulate ‘false patriotic’ dominionist Christians to go all around the World and spread a false gospel and totally Mind Control Multitudes upon multitudes in Africa…their mission is almost complete and they have succeeded in giving Africa a false Jesus Christ, they have given Africans an Anti – Christ and not The Real Historical Jesus Christ.  &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;As such they have taken away the spiritual independence of Africans who are no longer accountable directly to Jesus Christ but now have a Western Intermediary through whom they seek accountability to God… This is totally false and it is so sad that with millions and millions of dollars wasted, the counterfeit is what Africans have been given. However, there is good news, The New World Order Religious planners forgot about God and his Sovereignty. They forgot that God does exist, like the bible says the fool says God does not exist… They forgot that God still has a remnant left behind as the majority is taken away or ‘raptured’ or ‘ruptured’ away by False Western Doctrines… :&gt;)&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;A false Jesus Christ is what the New World Order seeks to spread in Africa to control minds and break any logical and independent thinking among Africans that can offer resistance to Western Christian Ideologies from Hell. So, the saying goes that behind the Cross, was the Flag. So, behind the false western gospel is the New World Order Flag.  We must remember that Western Gospel now has to do with ruling and taking over Nations and Cities for Christ – That is the sad and Nazi-ism ideology of Dominion Christianity or Kingdom now theology… &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;True Saints of God Please Stand up…&lt;br /&gt;It is my prayer, even through this writing that God will raise men and women who will stand on the True Word of God and reject the false gospel being spread around by American Religious Right Apostate Neo-con bewitched lunatic Christians masquerading around the globe as “missionaries” yet seeking to control and manipulate their constituents by imposing subtly and overtly a Gospel filled with Dominionism and Mammon. The Greatest Tool for Discernment is your Bible…The Word of God is enough to help you discern The Lord’s Voice and not follow after Purpose Driven Prosperity Wolves. Anything that is not lined up with scripture, reject…preach the Gospel verse by verse, precept upon precept as in the Book of Acts and not Purpose Driven Books by doctored by power hungry Neo-con Western preachers. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Political America Married to Religious America = Harlotry…&lt;br /&gt;It is interesting that liaison exists between Political America in its manipulation of African Politics for usury and Religious America who see the ‘results’ of the gospel and as catalyst for the expansion and fattening of their checkbooks. The saddest of these is the current marriage of Political America and Religious America, being used by the Neo-Conservatives (Neo-cons) to spread The New World Order (NWO) as reported in a number of Exposes‘.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;This marriage is mainly composed of The American Religious Right who see it fit to spread Dominionism around the world and as such seek to pervert the Gospel of Jesus Christ in Africa by spreading their teachings of how Christians must take over governments in Jesus Name just like they did in America by voting for GW Bush back into office. This deceit from The Religious Right in America backed by the power of Mammon has become the most dangerous weapon Satan is using to hoodwink Christians in Africa away from the True Gospel of Jesus Christ and His Sufferings - the Cross.   However, The Lord Jesus Christ will no longer stand such duplicity and lies; His True Words will certainly expose the very intents of the heart of men. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Say No to Christian Usury...&lt;br /&gt;I would also like to point out that I am not advocating a gospel of laziness or preaching to Africans that they are not to work and never to fight social ills like illiteracy and corruption that bind them in poverty. I am not rejecting the responsibility of the African Leader; his current failure is a work orchestrated by the New World Order American Christians sent allover the world to weaken The ‘African Man’ with false spirituality and exert on them a capitalistic gospel from New World Order America that lays ground for The New World Order American empire to take over resources such as Oil with no objections. However, African Christians should never turn The Word of God into usury for supposedly promised prosperity. God honors Truth and those who will work under the influence of God’s Truth will surely receive His Justice.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;However, the deceit being marketed by American preachers is one of lies and heave from hell that supposes that people can turn The True Word of God into usury so as to get all the prosperity, power, affluence and mammon…this has never been the Gospel and never Truth but lies. The Gospel of Jesus Christ is about forgiveness of sins, deliverance from demonic oppression, and carrying our crosses and following Him. If we love godliness then we must endure sufferings for Christ Jesus…it has been that way for all Christians through the centuries. We in the last days are even to endure more, seven years of tribulation. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Secondly, American preachers are constantly painting a picture through powerful media outlets like TBN that those who supposedly live right as they do will enjoy such an affluent Christian life as shown on TBN. To my number of trips back and fro to Africa, I have seen this deceit over and over again, especially in urban areas were Christians think that True Christianity is one portrayed by Paul Crouch and his preposterous Seed-faith Mammon family. I have found many Christians in Africa wasting resources to build structures just like those rendered on TBN and with all the Red Carpets…they have been bewitched and blinded by Paul Crouch and his fellow preachers in believing such deceit from Satan…this is truly ‘Another Gospel’.&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;Giving not tantamount to Righteousness… &lt;br /&gt;As I have previously mentioned before, giving is never synonymous with Holiness and righteousness. Reading the bible, one clearly sees Jesus Christ confronting this type of deceit that the Pharisees and Scribes enjoyed to display. For they loved to be seen as the greatest givers and enjoyed the honors accorded to those who gave large sums of money. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Many Christians in the West have been deceived that if the give to Africans or poor people, then they are righteous and holy and therefore see themselves as next to God. Jesus bemused these Pharisees when He categorically charged to their ears that the old lady who gave her button had given more than all the rich men had done. Jesus Christ was not to be deceived, for He checked the hearts of men and motives.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; The greatest tool being used by Satan to propagate deceit from the Apostate Churches in America to Africa has been through giving…using the power of Mammon, which is a pretext for spreading The Satanic New World Order America-nized Gospel. Many in Africa because of their plight in poverty don’t question the waters from whence they drink from. They don’t question the contamination of the milk they are getting…as long as it is 90 per cent milk, they will not question the subtle 10 per cent poison meant to kill them spiritually. On the other hand American so-called preachers and missionaries cement their motives by thinking that if they care for the poor and orphans in Africa, then they would have done Jesus Christ a great service and as such expand what they think is the kingdom of God yet what they propagate are their American denominations always giving handouts of half truth and lies. Jesus was so clear to His disciples when He warned then against the yeast of the Pharisees and Herod – the teachings of the False Leaders and Political Christianity.  The Paul in the letter to the Galatians warns the Christians of the same…&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Galatians 5:9&lt;br /&gt;9 A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;So, half-truth is no good truth at all but lies. The notion that it is okay to take 90 percent truth and accept 10 per cent deceit from false teachers, hypocrisy and lies from Satan is no truth at all…the little leaven leaveneth the whole lump…be aware of the yeast of the Pharisees and Sadducees for it is hypocrisy. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;This is what has killed the Church, especially in America where the same lies are propagated around the world. Half-truth and half lies is nothing but mere propaganda. The churches have become propaganda centers for the New World Order. It is a form of Mind Control and manipulation by those in Christian leadership. No true Christian can have a flourishing spiritual life in such churches. The leaders of these Mind Controlled churches always claim that “there is no church that preaches all truth” – this is in itself a lie and I urge saints to avoid such “men of God”. &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;Matthew 16: 5-12&lt;br /&gt; 5 And when his disciples were come to the other side, they had forgotten to take bread. 6 Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees. 7 And they reasoned among themselves, saying, It is because we have taken no bread. 8 Which when Jesus perceived, he said unto them, O ye of little faith, why reason ye among yourselves, because ye have brought no bread? 9 Do ye not yet understand, neither remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets ye took up? 10 Neither the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets ye took up? 11 How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? 12 Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Luke 12: 1-3&lt;br /&gt;1 In the mean time, when there were gathered together an innumerable multitude of people, insomuch that they trode one upon another, he began to say unto his disciples first of all, Beware ye of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy. 2 For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known. 3 Therefore whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness shall be heard in the light; and that which ye have spoken in the ear in closets shall be proclaimed upon the housetops&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;Spending Millions with Strings Attached…&lt;br /&gt;So, we hear churches and pastors boast of how they are to spend millions to care for the orphans and poor in Africa yet behind the curtains they are in usury schemes to collect more offertories for their ministries and gain accolades of men as being so humanitarian. So, in most cases you find out that the entire project they run across Africa are a means for survival and gain from them. It is how they benefit. That is why most of the so-called Non Governmental Organizations (NGO) spend huge amount of donor funds on so-called administrative costs, which can be defined as anything, and as such the poor become a source of means for survival… &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Social Works Not Gospel of Jesus Christ…&lt;br /&gt; So, giving powered by mammon become a conduit for manipulations and certainly evil and distortion of Truth and The Gospel. While I do appreciate the need to help the needy in Africa by clothing the needy and feeding the hungry, which should even be done at a greater degree, I do believe that we cannot substitute the Gospel of Jesus Christ that saves man from sin with American noodle soup gospel. The greatest need for any human soul is Jesus Christ and His Cross…we cannot pretend that we are preaching the gospel by simply giving hand outs yet deny these souls the message of salvation through Jesus Christ.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;African Man seen as ‘Evil’ and ‘Corrupt’…&lt;br /&gt; It is at this point that American Christian NGOs and Missionaries feel the need to assert control. The African man is always seen as the most corrupt and unable to care to his own business, therefore these missionaries engage in a colonial and imperialistic mode of imposing their “managerial skills’ on the “less skilled” Africans. The result is a perpetual dependency on Western Aid and Donor funds with the Africans conditioned to think that they can never take control of their own affairs – Total Mind Control. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Poor African Bewitched by Denominational Funding…&lt;br /&gt;These missionaries backed by humongous denominational funding always seek to impose the doctrines NOT of Christ Jesus but that of their American Denomination.  The poor Africans will never question the “generous” missionary simply because they see it as the only way to escape their predicament of vicious poverty…as such they will accept any false doctrines and drink from mudded waters that flow from the ponds of the Apostate American Christianity.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Giving By American Evangelicals Neo-Imperialistic…&lt;br /&gt;Giving by American Christian Denominations has become a Neo-Imperialistic and Neo-colonial New World Order adventure. These well established American Christian denominations see the poor in Africa as subjects who they must control and indoctrinate so as to expend their statistics and enlarge their checking accounts with huge donor funds from unsuspecting American Christians happy with the “Church Growth” of their denominations and what they see as a spread of Christianity with combined American democracy and so-called freedoms. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Be Aware of Yeast of Herod…&lt;br /&gt;As mentioned earlier, there is always a link between the Religious Right America in and The Neo-con Political America. We are witnessing history repeat itself with the saying come true that “Behind the Cross was The Flag”. American Christian Dominionism together with all who perpetrate it has become one of the most repugnancies and smears from Satan against the True Christians who have nothing at all to do with such hypocrisy. American Christians, because of their affluence and wealth have resorted to worshiping the god of Mammon and use Missions as a means of gain from other Americans while at the same time blinding the Africans from a true personal relationship with Jesus Christ that has no imperialistic string attachment to it.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Jesus saw such hypocrisy and warned his disciples against the yeast of the Pharisees and Sadducees…and interestingly, also the yeast of Herod…&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Mark 8:14-19&lt;br /&gt;14 Now the disciples had forgotten to take bread, neither had they in the ship with them more than one loaf. 15 And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod. 16 And they reasoned among themselves, saying, It is because we have no bread. 17 And when Jesus knew it, he saith unto them, Why reason ye, because ye have no bread? perceive ye not yet, neither understand? have ye your heart yet hardened? 18 Having eyes, see ye not? and having ears, hear ye not? and do ye not remember? 19 When I brake the five loaves among five thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up? They say unto him, Twelve.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Jesus Christ warns us first of the Yeast of The Pharisees and Second The Yeast of Herod. We know that the Pharisees represented The Religious Right of that day and all those who wanted to be seen as holy yet practiced deceit in darkness. They used good to pretend to be good on the outwards but the good acts were mere strings to bind yokes on those under them. The Pharisees just like the American Religious Right and Dominionism Movement had political backing…and that was King Herod who surprisingly loved to be seen as a solutions provider, and loved to be worshiped. He loved to be seen as a protector of religious freedoms of the Jews, yet many saw him as a traitor, even the Pharisees, but used him anyway to get their agendas done. Herod likewise used the Pharisees to legitimize his authority. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The differences are not so much different today with the advent of the Religious Right Dominion Movement…these are our modern day Pharisees and have a backing of an “evangelical” President of The United States of America who sees these religious lunatics as extending his “Freedoms” around the world. The Political and Religious, the Pharisees and Herod, all joining hands to establish deceit and lies as they push forward for world Dominionism. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Yes, Jesus Christ warned us against such ‘Political Christianity’…&lt;br /&gt;Jesus Christ was very adamant about such hypocrisy and said that we are to be aware of the Yeast of The Pharisees and The Yeast of Herod. Now, many are surprised that Jesus Christ would attack such a political figure as Herod…some Christians who will read this will be mad and go like…”oh no! How can he attack our Christian Brother, The evangelical President of the USA?”  Jesus Christ was very clear…the Yeast of Herod was to be rejected…the usury of politicians to use Christianity to foster their agendas was and is to be rejected by all Christians. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The recent usury demonstrated by the Herods of our day in the US has brought disdain to The Name of The Lord Jesus Christ. The war in Iraq had a blessing on many American non discerning Christians who bought into the Herod Yeast and with the blessings of the Yeast of the Religious Right Evangelicals, these poor Christians were deceived into a war that turned out to be lies and greed of the Rich Men of The Earth who are waging wars for Oil. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The Church in America has become so tied with the Political and that is what they are propagating around the world. That is the essence of Dominion Christianity. They see themselves as taking over politics and as such ushering in Jesus Christ’s Kingdom by having so-called Christian nations and so-called Christian politicians. This is the doctrine that was used to support GW Bush to office in America and support his imperialistic wars in Iraq for oil with lies as evidence…such Christianity is NOT and we should separate from such Political Evangecalism…&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;It is sad that Christians in Africa are drinking from the same cup of deceit from American Evangelical Political Christianity. As Christians it is time we renounce such activities, repent and love Jesus Christ, flee from such hideous yeast of Pharisees and Herod of Today. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;So, the business of using missions to bind Africans in another form of religious slavery and form denominational colonies is absurd and a reproach to the preaching of the true gospel.  &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Racist and Fascist Missionary Mentality…&lt;br /&gt;Because of this racist mentality by American missionaries, African peoples have resorted to see themselves and not real men and people who cannot think for themselves but have to wait on the white man from America to think and make plans for them. The American Pharisee Missionaries have succeeded in their mind control mission. It is interesting that American missionaries claim that handling of their institutions to the African Man will ruin their missions still largely control most of the missions and bible colleges being setup in Africa today. Most of the churches bare overtly mark of Americanization with no shame to these missionaries. The simple fact they give is that they supply money and resources and therefore Micro and Macro Manage the African Christian Man. This has been one of the greatest setbacks in developing true leadership in African Christian Communities. The whole notion is racist and at the very best fascist. &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;This mentality being fostered by American Missions is a very big hindrance to the furthering of the gospel in many parts of Africa and the cried a lot about 10-40 Window. American Missionaries see themselves with the ordained right, skills and endeavors from Heaven of fulfilling these missions. However, the mentality is sorely based on the dominion gospel that sees American Christians take all nations for Christ. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;America-nized Christian Culture a Reject…&lt;br /&gt;There are many setbacks that many have endeavored to write about on this subject. I for one being from Africa see that American Culture is constantly being rejected by thousands around the world, they are drained of all the imperialistic predilection that is portrayed by the religious right and neo-con politicians in America. They see this as an invasion to take away their religious freedoms and political freedoms and get imposed with the religion of GW Bush and his Neo-cons. However, dominionist American Missionaries refuse to see this and instead think that money will buy blessings. The poor Africans in turn resort to siphoning all the monies from the West while themselves turning corrupt more than their western dominionist sponsors…thus fulfilling the sayings of Jesus Christ to the Pharisees…&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Matthew 23:15&lt;br /&gt;15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Making Twice The Sons of Hell…&lt;br /&gt;So, shame and reproach is brought on The Name of The Lord in Africa by Christians who end up becoming more corrupt and reprobate than their American TV Evangelists and Denominational Missionaries who care more about expending their kingdoms. African Christians are now being turned into twice sons of hell than the American Evangelical political Christians. It is time to repent from all these dead works of men. I call upon African Christians to Repent and Turn Back to The True Word of God, a life of holiness, purity and righteousness, until we no longer live but Jesus Christ lives in us for His glory as we totally submit to Him alone and not to the laws and rulings of the America-nized Man. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;American Missionary-ism is over!!!&lt;br /&gt;At this point I would like to say that the American Missionary Enterprise is over! Yes, Missionary work, as we know it today will cease and stop because it has become a reproach before The Lord and His saints around the world. The era of American Denominational worldwide evangelism is over! This is a very hard saying and many will disagree…especially the imperialistic American dominion evangelicals. However, those who will critically look at these things will see otherwise. American evangelical Dominion Christianity is nothing but simply a push and extension of the American Empire and not the True and Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ. This is coming to an end and will not endure in the end times. It will not endure the great tribulations. Thanks to Jesus Christ for the great tribulation because it will be a time for cleansing and purification of the Church and death dead works of men such as the pathetic Dominion Evangelical Christianity. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Matthew 23:13&lt;br /&gt;13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Some of the False Peace and Security America-nized Church Doctrines…&lt;br /&gt;Once Saved Always Saved…&lt;br /&gt;Raptured Away before the Tribulation…&lt;br /&gt;Peace Prosperity, Tithe Gospel – Bribe God To ‘Get Rich Quick’ Theology…&lt;br /&gt;Purpose Driven Satanic Gospel – Goats are driven but Sheep are led…&lt;br /&gt;False Patriotism – ‘God Bless America Political Christianity’…&lt;br /&gt;Dominionism – Christian Political Takeover of all Nations for Christ…&lt;br /&gt;Commercialized Christianity – Sell DVDs Books, CDs and all spiritual junk food…&lt;br /&gt;Rejection of God’s Ordained Five Fold Ministry Leadership…&lt;br /&gt;Rejection of God’s Truth, His Word…&lt;br /&gt;Rejection of Holiness, Purity, and Righteousness…&lt;br /&gt;Rejection of The Holy Spirit – “I am already filled” Baptist nonsense and stupidity…&lt;br /&gt;Christian Feminism, usurping Man’s Authority and destroying leadership…&lt;br /&gt;One-Man CEO Pastor Churches/Ministries – Doctrine of the Nicolaitanes…&lt;br /&gt;Multi-Million Dollar Mega Church Building Theologies…&lt;br /&gt;Seeker Friendly Christianity – Friends of the World = World in Church…&lt;br /&gt;False Church Growth and Home Cell Movement – Playing The ‘Number’s Game’…&lt;br /&gt;False Worldwide American Missionary Outreaches – New World Order CIA Cover…&lt;br /&gt;…And many more…&lt;br /&gt;What to do…&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;Totally Surrender Your Life To Jesus Christ&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;Surrender yourself under the Covering of Jesus Christ and NOT any Man! Yes, don’t be accountable to mere Men to please Men, be accountable directly to the word of God, to Jesus Christ… Man cannot help, cursed is he who trusts Man, Trust Jesus Christ…&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;His Word…Study God’s Word&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;Holiness… Live a life of Holiness; separate from ALL that which is unholy…&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;Simple Fasted Lifestyle, stop hoarding wealth, stop that nonsense, it won’t help you a bit... live a simple life, if you have food, water and a roof over your head, that should be enough…&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;Be ready to suffer for Christ Jesus holding His Testimony True even unto death…&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;Preach The Gospel…preach repentance as in the Bible and not smooth-talker messages from corrupt and filthy American pulpits…&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;Be filled with The Holy Spirit, Yes Be filled with The Holy Spirit just like it happened in The book of Acts, stop your Baptist preconceived Ideas and nonsense and repent of them and Be filled with The Holy Spirit and learn to pray and worship in the Spirit. &lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;Prayer and Fasting…you will need to develop a devotion of prayer and forgo meals, yes fasting, it is hard work but you will need that…maybe that will help you loose some pounds…LOL!&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;Ask The Lord what He requires of you…His Will For Your Life&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;Meet and Fellowship with those of like-mind, who call on The Name of The Lord and will challenge you to a deeper Personal Relationship with Jesus Christ, to Holiness, Purity and Righteousness… Leave Babylonian Churches, yes, it is time to leave All Purpose Driven Prosperity Churches that do nothing but exalt Man. Yes, leave America-nized Churches and leaders…&lt;br /&gt;&gt;&gt;Care for the Poor, Orphans and the Neglected of This world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Your Brother In Christ&lt;br /&gt;Kato Mivule&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Won't Remove Article from Website&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.isrp.org/GuestCommentaries/mivulecom080206.htm&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Kato Mivule&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Commentary on The Antipas Article...&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;July 29, 2006&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The original URL for this article is:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Articles/Article4.htm &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;African Christians Awake, Babylon USA Not a Friend...Antipas New! &lt;br /&gt;Babylon and her scramble for African resources using Christianity as a pretext...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Behind the Cross, was the Flag"...African Independence Activists and their description of Western Missionaries...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;America is Babylon, Virgin Daughter of Babylon, and Daughter of Babylon spoken about in:Isaiah 13, Isaiah 14, Isaiah 47, Isaiah 48, Jeremiah 50, Jeremiah 51, Habakkuk 1:1-2, Zechariah 5:5-11, Revelations 17, Revelations 18.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;America is head of all Religious, Political, Social, Economical, Physical and Greater Babylon...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I believe that there is that Greater Babylon but America in Rev 17 is not only the head of the Religious Babylon but also Physical Babylon...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;...and God's command is to come out of her and flee from her midst...Amen&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have received e-mails from American Christians requesting that I remove this article from this website because Antipas Ministry is "Apostate" and spreading "Hate". Though I don't agree with S.R. Shearer and Antipas Ministries on 'every topic' but when it comes to this article, they are right on the mark and I will not allow myself to be deceived by some naive Americans that what is happening in Africa courtesy of the American Missionaries is "not happening". &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I will not pretend that these facts are not true simply because I want to please some Americans. What is stated in this article is very, very true and regardless of what problems some American Christians have with S.R. Shearer and Antipas Ministries, what was said in the article is truth and is exactly what is happening on the ground here in Africa...I am a witness. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don't deny the fact that some good missionaries have helped Africans here and are helping out...in most cases, these Missionaries come alone and are not part of the American Christian Enterprise, and currently many are undoing what the American Missionary Enterprise has done to Africa...I am not blind about that fact.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Whole so-called Missionary Projects by American Christian Denominations to Africa and the 10-40 window is a false and a counterfeit. I have written about this in my articles... 'Americanized Christianity, Another Gospel to Africa'; 'Jesus Christ, an Offence To Westernized Christianity'; 'The Laodicean American Church in Bed with Another Lover'; 'Transformations II, Political Christianity, and False African Revivals'.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;American Christianity is an Abomination, an evil, detestable and only corrupts. Currently in Africa, we are facing apostasy in Churches courtesy of Americanized Christianity. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Having said that, I know very well, that there is a remnant in America and the Lord knows them, they are not part of this false religious-political system and The Lord is calling them to come out of this Babylonian System (Daughter of Babylon = USA). To simply deny the link between American Political System and the False Christianity in America is a evil and being very, very unjust. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just because American Christians give money to Africa does not make their Political - Christianity alliance right. In Africa, we pray that we should not fall into the same trap and as such True Christians in Africa stand out as a witness against the whole American Christian Babylonian enterprise that it is false, apostate, and an abomination before God of Heaven and all True Christians in America should NEVER be apart of it and should come out of it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, for those who think Truth is Hate, go ahead and call it that...call evil good and good evil, or simply play ignorance and 'self righteousness' for which I have seen a lot in America and especially among 'American Christians'...Many think that the USA is so holy and righteous and deny the fact that her Christianity has been soiled by her political alliance with the American State and even gone further to make other nations drunk with the same apostasy of Dominionism, religious right movement and other abominable "Christian social practices... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;True American Christians are to come out of such diabolical alliances and renounce such associations and be a True Witness for Jesus Christ against such False Christianity that has been birthed, groomed and natured in America and certainly for American Hegemonic Interests. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Those who refuse to come out from such a filthy American Christian Dominionist Enterprise are also doomed for Hell, unless they repent. America is the greatest nation on planet earth in regards to Political, Social, Religious, and Economic Hegemony and as such receives the greatest rebukes and judgment from The Lord. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This writer has also studied and lived in America for seven years until he 'Came Out' of America and as such I know Africa very well and I know America very well. I am not a fool, stupid, or seeking some gain out of this...The American Hegemony is evil and on a collision course with God Almighty for Judgment. America among all nations will receive the severest of judgments...Amen.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fact is that we have gained nothing from so-called missionaries from the America Christian Enterprise here in Africa apart from Apostasy, materialism, control, manipulation, denominations, divisions, spiritual whoredoms, spiritual harlotry, and spiritual imperialism. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just check and see what the likes of Benny Hinn, TD Jakes, Joyce Meyer, Rick Warren and other American Liars and Apostates are doing here in Africa. African Christians lost their religious and spiritual liberties to American Preachers, Denominations, controllers etc...we don't want to be a part of that American religious political system anymore. Jesus Christ and True Christianity is not American and will NEVER be! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please, those among the so-called remnant movement in America, don't send me your emails of how you hate each other and how many divisions you have among yourselves. How such and such remnants are evil and you are okay, how, America is not Babylon etc...I am tired of such emails; they are nauseating, nasty, bogus, and not helpful at all. I don't need your divisions, and Africa does not need them... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have problems among your selves, contact the very persons involved and solve them. The fact that the whole so-called end time remnant movement in America is filled with hate, divisions, makes me believe it is false and a counterfeit! The Problem among you all is AMERICA. So, my simple advice is Come out of her! Rev 18:4... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Revelation 18:4&lt;br /&gt;(4) And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kato Mivule&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Uganda, Africa&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;WHAT BORN AGAIN CHRISTIANS CAN'T SEE THE NON CHRISTIANS READ THE BIBLE AND SEE THAT THE CHRISTIANITY OF PROSPERITY PREACHERS LIKE KAYANJA IS A FRAUD.REMEMBER CHRIST SAID THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SEE Kevin O'Connor'S ARTICLE &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is Pastor Robert Kayanja’s Christianity Christian?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;September 17, 2006&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ROVING EYE  &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.monitor.co.ug/artman/publish/OConnor/Is_Pastor_Robert_Kayanja_s_Christianity_Christian.shtml &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Pastor Robert Kayanja is rarely out of the news. Recently, there has been his alleged involvement in a wine smuggling racket. I have no idea whether there is any truth in these allegations, but what I do know is that it takes an immensely rich and powerful man to have organised and funded the large newspaper advertisements that subsequently appeared denying his involvement in the smuggling scandal.&lt;br /&gt;Kayanja oozes and drips wealth. According to The Red Pepper (September 2 2006 Page 2) he owns: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rubaga Miracle Cathedral; &lt;br /&gt;Highway Holiness International, an NGO with many American links; &lt;br /&gt;Robert Kayanja Ministries, an NGO with over 1000 branches in Uganda and the USA; &lt;br /&gt;a house in Chicago; &lt;br /&gt;businesses in the USA; &lt;br /&gt;innumerable Mercedes Benz and land cruisers; &lt;br /&gt;a private jet &lt;br /&gt;Furthermore, Kayanja is building a magnificent house at Ggaba on the shores of Lake Victoria. Last Sunday, at his Rubaga Miracle Centre his reaction to critics who say he is amassing wealth and building a palace in Ggaba, was: "It's none of their business!"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I find Kayanja's version of Christianity most distasteful. Jesus Christ lived in, and amongst, the poor. He travelled not in a private jet but on a donkey, whose modern day equivalent would perhaps be a bicycle or a boda boda. And should Jesus have flown in a plane, he would surely have accompanied the less wealthy passengers in economy class. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But that would not be good enough for Pastor Robert Kayanja. According to the same Red Pepper article: "The Kampala staff and ticketing agents of his favourite airline, British Airways, privately express surprise and concern that while some religious leaders fly aboard British Airways in any class available, Kayanja, who pastors a church of ordinary struggling Ugandans, can splash large amounts of money on First Class travel."I spoke to three Ugandans, and I found it reassuring that none of them respected Kayanja.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Catharine, a 20-year old athlete and a born-again Christian, drew upon that famous verse in the Bible: "Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God." (Mathew 19:24).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As Joachim Buwembo rightly pointed out (The East African, June 27 2006, P 15) this is a verse "you are not likely to hear anymore crossing a preacher's lips. Many a pastor has probably already deleted it from his Bible."But the verse had not been deleted from Catharine's brain. She commented: "The Bible says a certain man asked Jesus how he could enter God's Kingdom. Jesus said that he should sell everything and give to the poor. Rich pastors, if they are genuine, should give back their wealth to the poor. "Yusuf, a 25-year old computer engineer, had no doubts as to what motivates rich pastors:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"These people, the so called pastors, are out to make money. They go out there in developed countries asking money from people who are actually serious with Christian religion. And when they get this money, they come back here build a simple church using a quarter of what they were given. And the rest of the money is his and his family. They are just making money - their Christianity, I doubt."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the most forceful views were those of Stephen, a 31-year old IT professional. Almost yelling, he told me:&lt;br /&gt;"It is wrong for a man of God to be so filthy rich. But this is the way the whole pentecostal church thing has gone." "And what, Stephen, do you think of Pastor Kayanja's 'it's none of their business' reaction to those who criticise his huge wealth?"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"It is total nonsense!" replied Stephen. "A church is a public thing. He has to be accountable. People rightly want to know how he lives his life and what his values are. He is a public figure, full stop. That 'mind your business' statement is so annoying. Does Miracle Centre have audited books? I know KPC has."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Today, Sunday, I will not be in the Rubaga Miracle Centre, but hopefully watching Manchester United V Arsenal. Pastor Robert Kayanja, you can keep your form of Christianity. It is not for me, nor for my three Ugandan friends.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;kevin@imul.com&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2762831450212540565-2303561698544225505?l=takeheedafrica.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/feeds/2303561698544225505/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2762831450212540565&amp;postID=2303561698544225505' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/2303561698544225505'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/2303561698544225505'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/2008/03/ugandas-rotten-prosperity-movement.html' title='Uganda&apos;s Rotten Prosperity Movement'/><author><name>kizito Michael George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15869465479590651802</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2762831450212540565.post-1588559715422729535</id><published>2008-03-26T03:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-12-06T03:26:16.462-08:00</updated><title type='text'>You are wrong on tithing Pastor Peter Sematimba</title><content type='html'>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver. (2 Corinthians 9:7)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On his ‘living in prosperity’ programme on UBC Pastor Sematimba has been propagating the heresy that Christians should tithe if they are to get prosperity and blessings from God. In fact he threatens that God will send curses upon Christians who do not tithe. He bases his argument on Deut: 28  and Mal. 3&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The prosperity pastors in Uganda are threatening Christians that unless they bring their tithes to them to consume, they will be cursed by God. One pastor recently said that God can curse an entire church because of failure on part of one church member to tithe. You Liars and extortionists, if tithing is so  important  as you emphasize, how comes Jesus never tithed? How come the disciples never tithed? You say that  the tithe should be given to the pastor to consume, is a pastor a Levite?&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Can you give us a verse in the bible that says that the tithe should be given to the pastor to consume. You blame the Sevethday Adventists for emphasizing the Sabbath, how different are you? One of these days , you will tell us to circumcise our bodies. Tithing is nonsensical in this new testament period of grace.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WE ARE SUPPOSED TO GIVE AND NOT TO TITHE(Luke 6:38).Tithing is part of the mosaic law , we are no longer governed by the mosaic law and therefore  whoever  lives under the mosaic law in this new testament of grace is under a curse.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;DO NOT BELIEVE THE TITHING LIE: UNDER THE NEW COVENANT CHRISTIANS ARE SUPPOSED TO GIVE AND NOT TITHE. PRECISELY THE TITHING LAW IS OBSOLETE AND DEFUNCT.. AMEN &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://tekoapublishing.com/books/tithing/index.html   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Are Christians to Tithe or Give? &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Commentary/Comment46.htm  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A Few Financial Questions For Ugandan Pastors Today&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs41.htm"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs41.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;"TITHING" IS NOT FOR CHRISTIANS&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;  &lt;a href="http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~revival/lie-4.html"&gt;http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~revival/lie-4.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;YES, YOU SHOULD GIVE&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.tithingdebate.com/giving.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pastor Sematimba Kisses Cardinal’s ring&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/58/61/480465/emmanuel%20wamala"&gt;http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/58/61/480465/emmanuel%20wamala&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Christianity and the Tithe&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;a href="http://propheticoutreach.blogspot.com/2007/10/christianity-and-tithe.htmlOct"&gt;http://propheticoutreach.blogspot.com/2007/10/christianity-and-tithe.htmlOct&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Enforced Tithing&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2006/12/enforced-tithing.html"&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2006/12/enforced-tithing.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;You will be Cursed if you do not Tithe: OH! REALLY &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2008/02/you-are-wrong-on-tithing-pastor-peter.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;God bless you&lt;br /&gt; Kizito Michael George&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2762831450212540565-1588559715422729535?l=takeheedafrica.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/feeds/1588559715422729535/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2762831450212540565&amp;postID=1588559715422729535' title='5 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/1588559715422729535'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/1588559715422729535'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/2008/03/you-are-wrong-on-tithing-pastor-peter.html' title='You are wrong on tithing Pastor Peter Sematimba'/><author><name>kizito Michael George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15869465479590651802</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>5</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2762831450212540565.post-6474410764665243262</id><published>2008-03-26T03:14:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-03-26T03:17:06.209-07:00</updated><title type='text'>A Few Financial Questions For Ugandan Pastors Today</title><content type='html'>&lt;strong&gt;A Few Financial Questions For Ugandan Pastors TodayKato Mivule&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs41.htm"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/Apologetics/Appologs41.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;November 26, 2007&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Greetings Brethren and Shepherds,I am writing to you about a sensitive issue in the Ugandan Church Today concerning Finances today. This is in no way to 'attack' any preacher or pastor but to hold ourselves accountable to the WHOLESOME WORD OF GOD...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If we are truly sincere to ourselves and God's Holy Word, then we should at least take the challenge to answer a few of the questions below...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Issue of Finances has been abused and it has brought shame to The Name of The Lord among Christians and none Christians alike. Though there are few preachers and pastors who have stood for noble causes and used Finances honorably; however, many today are involved in what the Bible refers to as extortion and defrauding of the saints…I thought it imperative to call all Brethren and those who stand in position of shepherds among them to Accountability to God's Holy Word...After doing some small research here in Uganda, focusing on the Urban Areas - Kampala, Entebbe, Mukono, Jinja, I found something alarming... almost 8 out of 10 sermons preached on Sunday services are about money and manipulating people to give and sow into some 'big ministry" or minister... Other messages center on self motivation, positive thinking (thinking big, going to the next level), etc…messages that seem very ‘Christian’ until one opens their Bible to cross check just like the Berean Christians did in Acts 17:10…The News Media has had article after article exposing financial malpractice among many preachers in Kampala... Many Pastors dismiss these articles as 'witch hunt', yet The Name of The Lord is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of selfish actions by the Preachers and Pastors in the name of prosperity and getting rich...Story after story is out there of Pastors promising ‘big rewards’ from God if believers give, claiming that The Lord ‘Told them so’…&lt;br /&gt;Pastors are complaining that Folks are no longer giving Tithes as they ought to... The Tithes are reducing and thus making many Pastors angry with their congregations or issuing eternal threats to believers... like "you will not get into heaven if you don't tithe'...&lt;br /&gt;When one turns on Christian Radio and Christian TV today, most messages are about Prosperity, Tithes, and Sowing, how to get to the ‘next level’ (High mindedness), getting Visas etc… Christianity in Uganda is becoming a big business and money generating machine… Some preachers and Pastors do it overtly, others do it subtly in a very "organized way" yet still fleecing and defrauding the Saints of God...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is a shame to even mention what some Pastors and Preachers do to get money from believers here in Kampala, a behavior not much different from extortion and defrauding of the saints. The News Media is full of such stories and it is not my intention to bring those stories of palatial life styles and extortion among Kampala Pastors in this simple letter... Jesus Christ gave a stern warning to Pharisees about such behavior…that such folks had greater condemnation to Hell… Pretty strong words…hardly preached in today’s Prosperous Churches…&lt;br /&gt;Matthew 23:14&lt;br /&gt;(14) Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.&lt;br /&gt;Matthew 23:24-26&lt;br /&gt;(24) Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.&lt;br /&gt;(25) Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.&lt;br /&gt;(26) Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.&lt;br /&gt;So, I thought it worthy to call our selves back to Accountability NOT to MAN but to GOD'S HOLY WORD...Because it is GOD'S WORD THAT WILL JUDGE US and NOT MAN...&lt;br /&gt;· What does Jesus Christ Teach about Giving?&lt;br /&gt;· What does Paul the Apostle Teach about Giving?&lt;br /&gt;· Does True Bible Doctrine on Giving Matter today?&lt;br /&gt;· Does Matthew chapter 13 speak about Sowing to Give Money or about The Word of God and one’s response to God’s Word?&lt;br /&gt;· Is the Seed in Matthew 13 Money or God’s Holy Word?&lt;br /&gt;· Are we not supposed to give to the orphans, widows, poor and those in need?&lt;br /&gt;· Are we to Tithe or not to Tithe under the New Covenant of Jesus Christ?&lt;br /&gt;· Is tithing the only Old Testament Law of Moses we are supposed to keep in the New Covenant under Jesus Christ?&lt;br /&gt;· Are Pastors and Ministers Levites in Churches Today?&lt;br /&gt;· If so, did the Church replace physical Israel?&lt;br /&gt;· What about Hebrews Chapters 7 and 8?&lt;br /&gt;· Is Jesus Christ not the New and Perfect High Priest?&lt;br /&gt;· Did Jesus Christ not offer His Body as the perfect sacrifice once and for all as the Perfect High Priest without sin?&lt;br /&gt;· If so, how can a High Priest (Jesus Christ is from the Tribe of Judah) not from the Tribe of Levi receive Tithes?&lt;br /&gt;· Are All Believers not Priests in the Church Today according to 1 Peter 2:9?&lt;br /&gt;· Who is the High Priest today - Is it not Jesus Christ - Hebrews 7 and 8?&lt;br /&gt;· Then how comes a Pastor receives a Tithe and Not the High Priest?&lt;br /&gt;· Who is Head of the Body of Christ or the Church, is it Pastors, Apostles or Jesus Christ?&lt;br /&gt;· Why did Paul NOT teach the Church to Tithe but taught them instead to GIVE?&lt;br /&gt;· Why did Jesus Christ NOT teach about Tithes but taught people to GIVE?&lt;br /&gt;· Yes, the Bible Teaches Giving but are we not taught in the same Bible to Give freely and cheerfully but not out of compulsion?&lt;br /&gt;· Why are Pastors and Preachers forcing and manipulating Christians to give in Churches today with threats?&lt;br /&gt;· Is Tithing NOT part of MOSAIC LAW?&lt;br /&gt;· If it is, then why are we SUPPOSED to Keep It?&lt;br /&gt;· If we are to keep it then why NOT Keep the Circumcision and Sabbath Laws?&lt;br /&gt;· Is it NOT a Curse NOT to keep the Whole Mosaic Law according to Galatians Chapter 3 and 4?&lt;br /&gt;· So, why do Pastors and Preachers keep ONLY the Mosaic Law of Tithing yet they refuse to keep The Other Mosaic Laws like Circumcision and Sabbath observance?&lt;br /&gt;· If Tithing was before the Mosaic Law, then what about Circumcision which was before the Mosaic Law…why not keep it to justify both Tithing and Circumcision since both were practiced by Abraham before the Mosaic Law?&lt;br /&gt;· How to we obtain God’s Blessings?&lt;br /&gt;· Do we Obtain God’s Blessings (Abraham Blessings) through Tithing?&lt;br /&gt;· If so, what about Galatians 3:13-14?&lt;br /&gt;· Why did the Apostles have the ACTS chapter 15 Conference?&lt;br /&gt;· Was it not about the Issue of Keeping or Not Keeping the Mosaic Laws and Circumcision as a prerequisite for Salvation?&lt;br /&gt;· Is Tithing Not part of the discussed Mosaic Laws in the ‘Acts 15 Conference’?&lt;br /&gt;· Are we not guilty of Extortion and Devouring widows’ properties with Today’s Prosperity and Tithing Gospels?&lt;br /&gt;· Did Jesus Christ Really Promise to Make Material Wealth those who came to Him?&lt;br /&gt;· Did the Apostles promises Material Wealth to those whom they preached?&lt;br /&gt;· Is the Prosperity Gospel really scriptural?&lt;br /&gt;· What are The Lord’s Instructions to those who are Rich Materially in the Church?&lt;br /&gt;· Should we not repent to The Lord of Extortion, Defraud, Manipulation, Mind Control, threatening Saints for their failure to give to our ‘big ministries’?&lt;br /&gt;· Why don't Pastors and Ministers support themselves by Vocational Jobs Like Paul the Apostle did with his Tent Making Skill in order to support himself and NOT be a burden to the Churches?&lt;br /&gt;· Is it a sin for Pastors and Ministers to take on vocational jobs and work while they minister?&lt;br /&gt;· Is it right and biblical for Pastors to spend excessive amounts of money buying expensive cars, Gulf Stream Jets, Palatial Houses, and Designer Clothes all in the name of Prosperity, using funds given to Church by the Saints?&lt;br /&gt;· If so, is that not extortion?&lt;br /&gt;· Is it Biblical to preach that those who are poor will go to Hell and only the rich will go to heaven (because they don’t complain)…what about Lazarus and the Rich Man, what about James chapter 5:1-7, what about The Lord being the Defender of the poor, widows, orphans, and needy?&lt;br /&gt;· Does the Bible contradict itself or is someone preaching a false teaching?&lt;br /&gt;· Is it biblical to spend huge amounts of money on building Mega Churches (Cathedrals) while the rest of the saints starve and are filthy poor?&lt;br /&gt;· Where in the Bible did the New Testament Saints build Cathedrals or fundraise for Cathedrals?&lt;br /&gt;· Why did Jesus Christ not fundraise to build a temple when He preached on Earth?&lt;br /&gt;· Was Jesus Christ just being Lazy?&lt;br /&gt;· Why did Jesus Christ Not Fundraise to build the temple or refurbish the existing one but spoke doom and destruction to it in Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21?&lt;br /&gt;· Where is the Word Cathedral in the Bible, is it not a Catholic Term?&lt;br /&gt;· Do we NEED (Require, in sense that we cannot preach the gospel except we have money - Mammon) Money to Preach the Gospel though we can USE money to preach the Gospel?&lt;br /&gt;· Did the Early Church NEED Money to preach The Gospel or did they NEED the Holy Spirit and Truth in Preaching the Gospel?&lt;br /&gt;· Are Pastors and Christians Not supposed to STUDY God's Holy Word?&lt;br /&gt;· Are Christians and Pastors above Accountability to God’s Holy Word?&lt;br /&gt;It seems that we need to be sincere and search out these matters in the Bible again, otherwise The Lord is holding all guilty who extort and defraud saints of money and possessions through such Doctrines as the Prosperity Doctrine, Tithing Doctrine, and Manipulative giving Teachings…&lt;br /&gt;I stand to be corrected if Scriptures prove me wrong… However, I believe Christians ought to wake up and look into these matters just as the Berean Christians did in Acts chapter 17…&lt;br /&gt;Acts 17:10-11&lt;br /&gt;(10) And the brethren immediately sent away Paul and Silas by night unto Berea: who coming thither went into the synagogue of the Jews.&lt;br /&gt;(11) These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the Scriptures daily, whether those things were so.&lt;br /&gt;These are just a few financial questions I have for Brethren and Pastors and hopefully it explains why many believers are shunning Tithing in Churches today and instead opt to give freely as they are led of The Holy Spirit…&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In Christ JesusKato Mivule&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yesumulungi.com/"&gt;http://www.yesumulungi.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2762831450212540565-6474410764665243262?l=takeheedafrica.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/feeds/6474410764665243262/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2762831450212540565&amp;postID=6474410764665243262' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/6474410764665243262'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/6474410764665243262'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/2008/03/few-financial-questions-for-ugandan.html' title='A Few Financial Questions For Ugandan Pastors Today'/><author><name>kizito Michael George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15869465479590651802</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2762831450212540565.post-8464324040199906476</id><published>2008-03-26T01:38:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-12T04:46:13.365-07:00</updated><title type='text'>CHANGING THE BIBLE</title><content type='html'>&lt;strong&gt;ARE THERE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES &lt;br /&gt;IN THE BIBLE VERSIONS? &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.safeguardyoursoul.com/html/bible_versions.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;The Precious King James Bible&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.lovethetruth.com/king_james_bible.htm&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THE KING JAMES BIBLE DEFENDED &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/1611_authorized_king_james.htm &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Isn't “Easter” in Acts 12:4 a mistranslation?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.av1611.org/kjv/easter.html   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ATTACK ON THE BIBLE:ATTACK ON GOD &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.av1611.org/attack.html &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;IN DEFENCE OF THE KJV:SUMMONS &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2006/12/in-defence-of-kjv.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THE LORD CHANGES NOT &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/kjvdefns.htm &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CHANGING THE BIBLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.lorendavis.com/news_articles_chg_bible.htmlby"&gt;http://www.lorendavis.com/news_articles_chg_bible.htmlby&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Loren Davis&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;God's Word, the Bible, is His covenant with mankind and applies to all generations. The religious practice of pointing out so-called errors in the Bible is what has produced Mormonism, Jehovah Witnesses, Islam, and the massive schism in the Christian world today. This attitude has produced THE GAY TRANSLATION, THE FEMINIST TRANSLATION; translations that say nothing about the VIRGIN BIRTH of Christ; and versions that delete THE NECESSITY OF THE BLOOD for redemption. This list goes on into infinitum. Nothing makes a person angrier than for someone to take what he says out of context, twist his words and misrepresent him. If we, as people, feel that way when someone distorts our words, how do you suppose God feels when His words are distorted? The New Testament is THE NEW COVENANT between God and man. It is a legal document, the law of God that must not be tampered with. The Bible is God's unchanging, infallible Word&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;METHODS OF TRANSLATING THE BIBLE &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many translations were made by one man. Question? If one person is translating the scriptures, is it possible for him to make mistakes? Is it possible or even probable that he will taint the translation with his own doctrinal positions? The answer is obvious. Other translations were commissioned by a denomination or a particular group. Is it possible that these translations will be tainted by their doctrinal beliefs? Knowing mankind, it is impossible to believe otherwise. For example, the Catholic Bible, the Duhey Version, totally deletes "Thou shalt not make before me any graven images" from the Ten Commandments given in Exodus 20. The reasoning behind this is not hard to figure out. Catholic churches are full of graven images. WHICH BIBLE IS RIGHT? Many translations come from corrupt texts, manuscripts that were scholastically proven to be inacurate. The Bible revisers, Hort and Westcott, did not even believe in the infallibility of the Bible. By developing such watered down Bibles, the world's religions will soon have a common book to rally around, a Bible that will deny the divinity of Christ and one that will be contrary to His teachings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NEW AGE VERSIONS, FLUID BIBLES &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The New Age Movement has impacted modern Bible translations and has given us New Age Versions of the Bible. Three of these are the NIV, NASB and The Message paraphrase. Using these many translations is doing nothing but making a "fluid" Bible, which is like water. It will take on the form of whatever it is put into. A New Age Bible is developing which can be used by all religions (even non-Christians). It is so fluid that it can be taken many different ways. The New Age Movement, by using these different translations, has even infiltrated most of Evangelical Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It has SLOWLY BEEN CHANGING THE BIBLE AND ITS DOCTRINES TO LINE UP WITH the "One World" movement, the "New World Order". THESE NEW TRANSLATIONS ARE GETTING THE APOSTATE CHURCH READY to accept the Antichrist, the Mark of the Beast, his Image, and the anti-Christ's religion, Satanism. 2 Thesselonians 2:3 The proliferation of so many translations of the Bible has done more to change the teachings of Christ than any other thing. Some who worked on the NIV admitted that the translators own beliefs influenced their work.One quote from Palmer, the manager of the NIV translation, said that "the common error in the KJV was, namely that regeneration depends upon faith...and that in order to be Born Again, man must accept Jesus as his Savior". If the manager of the NIV translation project has such an objection regarding "The Born Again" experience, how is his translation going to be untainted by his view? We know that many so called "Christian" denominations do not believe in being born again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;UNSUSPECTING CHRISTIANS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Despite the facts that many of these versions are based on corrupt texts, they are continually being sold to unsuspecting Christians in Christian bookstores.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Accuracy is totally ignored as long as they will sell and make money for the retailer. THE INTEGRITY OF THE BIBLE AND IT'S INFALLIBILITY IS THE MAIN ISSUE FOR CHRISTIANS. OTHERWISE, HOW COULD ONE EVER BELIEVE IT? MANY VITAL ISSUES ABOUT MORALITY, ETERNITY, AND THE PROMISES OF GOD ARE AT STAKE. The reason this issue is so critical is that without the Bible's integrity it is impossible to establish Bible doctrine and truth. There are "favorite Word" people who attach themselves to certain scriptures, and either ignore or reject other scriptures. If, as they say, certain scriptures are not accurate, how do we know which scriptures are true? On that premise, John 3:16, the foundation for salvation may not be true. How can we know that the promises for healing and blessing are accurate? What if those scriptures were not translated correctly? The Bible is the only foundation we have to know about Jesus; salvation; and heaven. When faith in the Bible has been shaken, the foundation of our faith has crumbled.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Doctrines of devils"(1 Timothy 4:1) can then easily take the place of the doctrines of the Bible. Many who believe the Bible is full of errors particularly target the King James Version. No version has been attacked more than the KJV. The biggest assault on the KJV comes from inside Christianity. Is this attack justified? WHY SHOULD WE TRUST THE KING JAMES VERSION ( KJV)? HOW WAS IT TRANSLATED? Scholastically, the KJV IS DIFFERENT FROM OTHER TRANSLATIONS. Consider these facts regarding how the KJV was translated. This will help you to gain total confidence in the integrity and scholarship that went into it so that you can be fully assured the KJV is TRULY THE WORD OF GOD. There is a major difference in a "professing" Bible, containing some of the Word of God, or the Bible that literally is the Word Of God. A TRUE BIBLE CANNOT BE PARTIALLY ACCURATE. 47 TRANSLATORS WERE INVOLVED IN THE TRANSLATION OF THE KJV "Never in history had such an assembly of scholarship and spirituality been brought together on a project as these FORTY-SEVEN LEARNED MEN.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Four were college presidents, six were bishops, and five were university professors who were all Greek and Hebrew scholars of rare scholarship. Three of them were eastern linguists who were well versed with Arabic. They were as at ease with the eastern languages as they were with their own English. "All of them believed in the plenary, verbal inspiration of the Bible, the Divinity of Christ without equivocation, and all of them were men of prayer. Some prayed as much as five hours per day during the entire course of their Christian lives. Only God could have prepared this group of men for such a monumental task, the results of which were, in the providence of God, needed for the great evangelistic and missionary thrust of the succeeding centuries." 1&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THEY WERE DIVIDED INTO 6 COMPANIES&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Each person was assigned certain portions of the scriptures to translate. After he finished, he met with others in the group to compare results. Their combined work was then given to each of the other groups of companies for review and approval. Finally A SELECT COMMITTEE OF TWO OF THE BEST EXPERTS IN LINGUISTICS was assigned for THE TASK OF FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL. The results were that this gave the world an objective, unbiased translation of the Bible which was done with the highest degree of scholarship. Nothing in history can match the scholarship. It still stands as a masterpiece of scholarship and literary art, unexcelled in the history of the world." 2 To criticize the King James Version is to ignore how it was translated. That criticism is unfair. It is an objective, scholarly, and unbiased translation that has no doctrinal axe to grind. Therefore, it should be unwaveringly accepted as the Word of God and believed to be completely accurate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;IF ONE BELIEVES THAT PART OF THE BIBLE IS UNRELIABLE, THEN REALISTICALLY, ONE CANNOT KNOW FOR SURE WHICH PART IS ACCURATE AND BELIEVABLE, and which is not. Then the foundation of the Faith is destroyed, because... *Romans 10:17 "Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God." *Psalm 11:3 "IF THE FOUNDATIONS BE DESTROYED, WHAT CAN THE RIGHTEOUS DO?" Therefore, I submit that THE KJV MUST BE THE STANDARD BY WHICH EVERYTHING ELSE IS JUDGED. ELIZABETHAN ENGLISH: KJV AND SHAKESPEARE Many criticize the KJV saying it is hard to understand because it uses the old Elizabethan English. Yet, in the west, SHAKESPEARE is mandatory for students in schools. Shakespeare used the same Elizabethan English as the KJV. I have never heard a complaint that children can't understand Shakespeare. There are no calls to retranslate Shakespeare to put it into modern language.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As a boy I read the KJV and had no problem understanding what "thee and thou" meant. To use modern English for the Bible wouldn't be an issue if while doing this, they wouldn't change the meaning of what the Bible is saying, but that is not what has happened. These newer versions change the very essence of the Bible's doctrines. The complaint about the KJV using Elizabethan English is just a subtil ploy to change the real message of the Bible. The NIV is now the biggest selling Bible in the world. It is becoming very difficult to get a KJV Bible in bookstores.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;COMPARING THE KJV WITH OTHER TRANSLATIONS EXAMPLES: Romans 1:20 in KJV," For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse." The NIV and NASB change "GODHEAD" to "divine nature." This language does away with the concept of THE TRINITY. John 3:15, KJV states..."Whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have eternal life" The NIV deletes "should not perish" and says "May" have eternal life instead of "Shall". Colossians. 1:14, KJV, states..."In whom we have redemption through his blood..." NIV and NASB state simply..."In whom we have redemption"... The blood is deleted. Without shedding of blood there is no remission of sin. Hebrews 9:22 Psalms 8:5, KJV... "For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour". NIV and NASB.... "Yet thou hast made him ...a little lower than God". Proverbs 8:18 KJV says..."Riches and honour are with me; yea, durable riches and righteousness." NASB and NIV state..."With me are riches and honor, enduring wealth and prosperity. Prosperity takes the place of righteousness.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1 Corinthians 8:4, KJV... "As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world." NASB... "There is no such thing as an idol". It denies the very existence of idols. Luke 4:8 KJV Jesus said, "Get thee behind me Satan". "NIV omits "Get thee behind me Satan." Luke 4:4 says, "And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God." NIV, NASB, omits "by every word of God." Daniel 3:25, "He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God." NIV and NASB say... "He said, "Look! I see four men walking around in the fire, unbound and unharmed, and the fourth looks like a son of the gods." (A son of the gods is much different than THE SON OF GOD). John 9:35, KJV... "Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and when he had found him, he said unto him, Dost thou believe on the Son of God?" NIV, NASB, "Jesus heard that they had thrown him out, and when he found him, he said, Do you believe in the Son of Man?" John 3:16, KJV "for God so loved the world that he gave his ONLY BEGOTTEN SON, that whosoever believeth on him should not perish but have everlasting life." NIV ..."For God so loved the world that he gave his ONE AND ONLY SON, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON IS DELETED.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Deleting "begotten" has a direct impact on the essential truth that Jesus was born of a virgin with a heavenly Father, which makes Him God in the flesh. He had the flesh of man, but the blood of God. He was sinless. John 3:18, NIV "Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's ONE AND ONLY SON. Again, the NIV DELETES "THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON OF GOD." The biblical concept of Jesus being God's ONLY BEGOTTEN SON is foundational to salvation. In John 1:14, and 1:18 the NIV also deletes ONLY BEGOTTEN SON. Matthew 1:23 , KJV says..."Behold A VIRGIN shall be with child." Matthew 1:23, NIV "THE VIRGIN will be with child and will give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel", which means, "God with us." The terminology THE VIRGIN was taken from Babylon and Egypt and is pagan. 1 Timothy 3:16,KJV..."GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH." NIV "Beyond all question, the mystery of godliness is great: He appeared in a body, was vindicated by the Spirit, was seen by angels, was preached among the nations, was believed on in the world, was taken up in glory." The NIV DELETES the phrase, "GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH". If Jesus was not manifest in the flesh, there is no Gospel. *2 John 1:7 "For many DECEIVERS are entered into the world, WHO CONFESS NOT THAT JESUS CHRIST IS COME IN THE FLESH. THIS IS A DECEIVER AND ANTICHRIST." Romans 8:1 KJV "There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." The NIV DELETES "who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That means that if one has accepted Christ, even if he doesn't live right he is not under condemnation. This is the doctrine of many denominations which believe one's behavior has nothing to do with his salvation. They finally got a Bible to substantiate their doctrine. The words "SOVEREIGN and SOVEREIGNTY" are not found in the KJV one time. The NIV uses the word SOVEREIGN 315 times and SOVEREIGNTY twice. This is a prime example of denominations influencing translations to taint it with their denominational doctrine of "The Sovereignty of God". This is blatantly changing the scriptures and ADDING to them in defiance of Revelation 22:18-19. The NIV translation and teaching on "The Sovereignty of God" negates all the Bible's teachings on the importance of having faith and believing God to receive from Him. KJV speaks of "THE DOCTRINE OF CHRIST". *II John 9 states... "Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son." KJV uses the word DOCTRINE 51 times. The NIV uses the word DOCTRINE only 5 times.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is this not changing the Bible? What about the "NEW" King James Version (NKVJ)? NKJV omits the word ..."REPENT" 44 times; "GOD" 51 times; "LORD" 66 times; "HEAVEN" 50 times; "HELL" 22 times; "DAMNATION" entirely; "DEVILS" entirely; "JEHOVAH" entirely; the "NEW TESTAMENT" entirely. (You can use the concordance on your computer comparing the KJV and the NKJV to verify this). MANY TRANSLATIONS ARE BASED ON CORRUPT GREEK TEXTS Here is a test to determine if a translation is based on corrupt Greek texts or not. *Use 1 Timothy 3:16, which says, "GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH, justified in the spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory." If your version does not state this, you can then be assured that the translation comes from corrupt texts. Even many translations that accurately translate this scripture often change many others. Just because the cover of a book says Holy Bible doesn't make it a true Bible .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*Psalms 105:8 "He hath remembered HIS COVENANT FOR EVER, THE WORD which HE COMMANDED TO A THOUSAND GENERATIONS." THE CHANGING OF SCRIPTURES The changing of scriptures by these varied translations has no end. THE SIN IS ADDING TO and/or TAKING away FROM THE BIBLE, GOD'S WORD. By doing this the translators are blatantly distorting the scriptures. These translations are no longer Holy Bibles, but fraudulent imposters. If I were the devil I would rewrite the Bible and get into the Bible translating and publishing business. He needs no advice regarding this,however, because this has already happened. This strategy of using translations to change the Bible is so diabolical that it had to come from Satan himself. This tactic has even deceived many of the very elect. It is the work of The Deceiver! Revelation 18:23 God is jealous over His Word and will not tolerate it being tampered with. To attack the integrity of the Bible is to attack the integrity and infallibility of God. The Bible is not an ordinary book. It is supernatural. God gave His Word by the Holy Ghost, and He knows how to keep it generation after generation. It was not given just to an exclusive club of clerics who are Greek scholars. That is how the Catholic church operated for years. For a long time, itt was even illegal for the laity to even have a Bible. They needed a priest to tell you what the Bible said and what it meant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now the protestants, by using so many translations and the heavy usage of the Greek, are virtually doing the same thing. THE PRACTICE OF USING MANY TRANSLATIONS Many ministers use several translations to develop their messages. Is there a problem here? Since most translations disagree with each other to varying degrees, this leaves it to the judgment of the minister which one he thinks is translated correctly. I have often heard preachers comment after reading from the KJV, that "this scripture was translated wrong." Then he goes to another translation and says that it was translated the right way in this one! In preaching a message, they often jump from translation to translation. This is what I refer to as the eclectic way of finding truth. If you don't like what you are reading, just go to another translation that you like better. Jumping from translation to translation now makes the preacher the final authority of faith and not the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This practice actually destroys faith in the Bible by causing the congregation to doubt that what they are reading is accurate. Now we are left with the notion that we can't understand the Bible without the preacher interpreting it for us. This practice is deadly. The abuse of the Greek to privately interpret scriptures is very intimidating. Some will read the Bible, then tell their congregants that the Holy Spirit told them that this was how it should have "really been interpreted". *2 Peter 1:20-21 "Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost." God is jealous over His Word and will not tolerate it being tampered with. To attack the infallibility of the Bible is to attack the infallibility of God. John 1:1 says "...the Word was with God and the Word was God." The Bible is not an ordinary book. It is supernatural. God gave it to men by the Holy Ghost, and He knows how to keep it generation after generation. 2 Timothy 3:16, Psalm 105:8 A WARNING FOR THOSE&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;WHO WOULD CHANGE THE BIBLE &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Revelation 22:18-19 "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book." KJV A WARNING FOR THOSE WHO BELIEVE A LIE II Thesselonians 2:11-12 "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should BELIEVE A LIE: That THEY ALL MIGHT BE DAMNED who BELIEVED NOT THE TRUTH," To trust in a corrupt translation will cause you to believe a lie and can lead you to be damned for eternity. PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE IS DANGEROUShttp://www.lorendavis.com/news_articles_pdl.htmlTHE FIVE POINTED SIRIUS STARhttp://www.lorendavis.com/news_articles_sirius.htmlTHE ENEMIES OF CHRISTIANITYhttp://www.lorendavis.com/news_articles_pagan1.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------This article is an excerpt from my book "The Paganization of Christianity" which can be ordered online at www.lorendavis.com 1 New Age Bible Versions, Gail Riplinger2 Bible Versions, Eldred Thomas; New Age Bible Versions, Gail Riplinger&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;SECOND ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A Creationist's Defense of the King James Bible&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;by Henry M. Morris*&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this day of rapid change, when many Christians have suddenly started using one of the many modern English translations of the Bible (NASB, NIV, NEB, NRSV, NKJV, etc.), abandoning the long-used King James Version read and loved by English-speaking people of all ages and walks of life for over ten generations, it may be appropriate to review a few of the reasons why many creationists, including this writer, still prefer to use the latter.The King James Translators One reason is that all the fifty or more translators who developed the King James Bible were godly men who believed strongly in the inerrancy and full authority of Scripture and who, therefore, believed in the literal historicity of Genesis, with its record of six-day Creation and the worldwide flood.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This has not been true of many who have been involved in producing the modern versions.The spiritual motivations and convictions of the King James translators are indicated by their fascinating preface, entitled "The Translators to the Reader." The flavor of this impassioned essay can be illustrated by the following brief excerptsThe Scriptures then being acknowledged to be so full and perfect, how can we excuse ourselves of negligence, if we do not study them, of curiosity, if we be not content with them? . . . It is not only an armor, but also a whole armory of weapons, both offensive and defensive; whereby we may save ourselves and put the enemy to flight. It is not an herb, but a tree, or rather a whole paradise of trees of life, which bring forth fruit every month, and the fruit thereof is for meat, and the leaves for medicine. . . . a fountain of most pure water springing up unto everlasting life, and what marvel? The original thereof being from heaven, not from earth; the author being God, not man; the Editor, the Holy Spirit, not the wit of the Apostles or Prophets; the Penmen such as were sanctified from the womb, and endued with a principal portion of God's Spirit; the matter, verity, piety, purity, uprightness; the form, God's word, God's testimony, God's oracles, the word of truth, the word of salvation, etc.; the effects, light of understanding, stableness of persuasion, repentance from dead works, newness of life, holiness, peace, joy in the Holy Ghost; lastly, the end and reward of the study thereof, fellowship with the saints, participation of the heavenly nature, fruition of an inheritance immortal, undefiled, and that shall never fade away; happy is the man that delighteth in the Scripture, and thrice happy that meditateth in it day and night.Furthermore, the King James translators were also great scholars, every bit as proficient in the Biblical languages as any of those who have come after them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They were very familiar with the great body of manuscript evidence, as well as all the previous translations. They worked diligently on the project (assigned to them by King James) for over seven years, completing it in the year 1611.The professional qualifications of the translators were all extremely high. There were 54 scholars originally assigned to the project by King James, though some died early in the project. There were evidently 47 who were active throughout the project, all of whom were exceptionally well qualified both academically and spiritually.For example, John Bois, who kept the most complete account of the proceedings of the translators, was extremely skilled in both Hebrew and Greek. In fact, it is reported by his biographer that he was reading through the Hebrew Old Testament when he was only five years old. He was expert in all forms of Greek, including the Koine Greek of the New Testament, and compiled one of the largest Greek libraries ever. Dr. Bois became Dean of Canterbury in 1619.Lancelot Andrews, a leader of the Old Testament translators, had been chaplain to Queen Elizabeth. He was fluent in fifteen modern languages, as well as Hebrew, Greek, and the cognate Biblical languages. He served as Dean of Westminster and later as Bishop of Winchester.Dr. William Bedwell was expert in Latin, Arabic, and Persian, preparing lexicons in these languages, as well as in the Biblical languages.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Edward Lively, who died after only a year, had been Regius Professor of Hebrew at Cambridge and had an unequaled knowledge of the Oriental languages. Dr. John Harding was Regius Professor of Hebrew at Oxford. Miles Smith was a noted Orientalist who became Bishop of Gloucester in 1612. He was the last man to review the translation and was selected to write the Translators' Preface.Dr. Andrew Downes spent forty years as Regius Professor of Greek at Oxford University and was on the final checking committee of the translation. George Abbott became Archbishop of Canterbury in 1611. Sir Henry Saville was Provost of Eton and was a scientist as well as Bible scholar. His works included an eight-volume edition of the works of Chrysostom. And on and on. All the translators were great scholars, deeply fluent in the Biblical languages, the cognate languages, the writings of the church fathers and other relevant materials, as well as accomplished writers in English. It is almost certain that no group of Bible scholars before or since has ever been as thoroughly fit for their task as was the King James Translation Team.The result of their consecrated labor was that the so-called "Authorized" version eventually displaced all those that had gone before and then has withstood the test of wide usage in all English-speaking countries ever since.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To suddenly abandon it in just one over-stressed, pseudo-intellectual, largely apostate generation may well prove to be a decision with sad and entropic consequences.Which New Translation Could Replace It? This is not a new question. As a matter of fact, there have been no less than 120 English translations of the complete Bible published since the King James, as well as over 200 New Testaments. Even in my own lifetime there have been at least 45 Bibles plus about 100 New Testaments, and I have tried to use at least 20 of them.My wife and I were given an American Standard Version for a wedding present when we married in 1940, and I later bought a Berkeley Version, then a Williams, and a Phillips - each time thinking the latest might be the best. I was especially pleased when the Revised Standard Version was finally marketed in 1952 with great publicity. Each time I was disappointed, however, and soon went back to the KJV. Later came the Amplified and the Expanded and the Basic English and the Living Bible and many others.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I even studied some of the older translations (Afford, Weymouth, Goodspeed, etc.).Each of these provided interesting variations in wording, as well as updating the archaic expressions and old-style English, but something always seemed missing, so I continued using the King James in my writing and speaking, and God continued to bless its use, in spite of its Elizabethan-age English.But other new translations kept on appearing. The New English Bible, Good News for Modern Man, the Anchor Bible, New American Standard, New International Version -- even the New King James Version. There were numerous others, most recently one called God's Word.On one of these -- the New King James Version -- I was even a member of the North America Overview Committee, reviewing the proposed translation of Genesis in particular, even though I cannot read Hebrew. The men who worked on the NKJV were, so far as I know, all godly men committed to Biblical inerrancy, and many of them, at least, to literal creationism, and I do believe it is the best of the modern translations. Even so, after trying to use it and endorse it, I finally went back to the "old" King James, convinced that it is still the best, in terms of poetic majesty, spiritual power, and over-all clarity and reliability.Therefore, even if one really feels keenly that he ought to switch to a modern translation, how does he decide which? With apologies to Judges 9:25, it seems today that "every man does that which is right in his own eyes," as far as selecting a Bible is concerned. But how can he decide which, if any, best preserved the inspired, authoritative Word of God? After all, God did say that His Word had been "for ever settled in heaven" (Psalm 119:89) and had given sober warning to any who would presume to supplement, delete, or distort any of the words of Scripture (Revelation 22:18,19; II Peter 3:16).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is God the Author of Confusion? &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For a long time, the "official" English version used in each Bible-believing church was the King James, with the others used occasionally for reference study by teachers and pastors. Now, however, confusion reigns. Congregational unison reading is no longer possible, and church members often don't even bring their Bibles to church. The pastor preaches from one version and the people in the congregation each have their own, so they can't follow the pastor anyway, and thus they just listen, and soon forget.Scripture memorization, which has been an incalculable blessing in my own Christian life, is almost a lost art these days. I remember back in 1943 when Dawson Trotman, founder of the Navigators, first got me and others in our Gideon Camp back in Houston, to start memorizing Scripture, he used to stress that the verses should be quoted "word perfect," with their respective "addresses" cited fore and aft. But such meticulous attention to the very words of a Scripture verse becomes anomalous when even the supposed authorities all disagree on what it says, so why bother? In addition, the musical phrasing in the King James makes it easier to memorize than the more ponderous English of the modern versions.And what becomes of our long-cherished belief in verbal inspiration? If it's only the "thought" that counts, then the words are flexible. Yes, but then the thoughts themselves easily become flexible also, and we can adjust the words to make them convey whatever thought we prefer. We forget that precise thoughts require precise words.Another fast-vanishing form of Bible study is that of comparative word studies, comparing the various usages and contexts of a given key word or phrase as it occurs throughout the Bible. This has been a highly fruitful means of obtaining many precious insights into the mind of the divine writer who inspired all of them. A given word may have been rendered in various ways by the King James translators, of course, but they have assured us (in their preface) that this was always done very carefully and in accord with context and the known range of meanings carried by the word itself. A Bible student may easily discern and compare all of these -- usually with real blessing to his mind and heart -- even without knowledge of Greek and Hebrew, simply by using one of the complete concordances based on the King James translation (Strong's or Young's). But this type of study is far more difficult, if not practically impossible, with most modern versions in which the translators have often either resorted to paraphrasing the supposed thought of the writer, or even to using their own interpretation of what they think he would have said if he were aware of our modern scientific knowledge of things.One can only wonder -- and speculate -- about why our ecclesiastical leaders have felt it necessary to keep producing so many new English translations all the time. The Bible, of course, is the best selling book of all time, but surely publishing profits and translators' royalties don't have anything to do with it. Anyway, in spite of the rising popularity of many modern versions, there are still more King James Bibles and Testaments being printed and distributed today than any other. Which Version Best Renders the Original Manuscripts? Even many King James Bibles now have added footnotes referring to what are said to be "better manuscripts" which indicate that certain changes should be made in the King James text. The most famous such changes are the omission of the last twelve verses of Mark and the first eleven verses of John, chapter 8, but there are many other important omissions, as well as some additions and many word changes that have been incorporated in these new versions, with the implication that all these changes have been derived from these "better" ancient manuscripts.But what are these better manuscripts, and are they really better? The whole subject of New Testament criticism is too complex to discuss here (or for me to try to discuss anywhere!), but it is significant that almost all of the new versions of the New Testament are based on what is known as the Westcott-Hort Greek text, or some modification thereof (such as the Nestle-Aland text), whereas the King James is based largely on what is known as the Received Text (also called the Textus Receptus or the Byzantine Greek text). As far as the Hebrew text of the Old Testament is concerned, the King James is based on the Masoretic text, while the modern versions rely somewhat on the Masoretic but also on the Septuagint, the Latin Vulgate, the Dead Sea Scrolls, and various others, especially the Kittel Hebrew reference text, Biblia Hebreice, in its "Stuttgart" edition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Masoretic text was compiled from the ancient manuscripts of the Old Testament by the Masoretes, who were groups of Hebrew scholars dedicated to guarding and standardizing the traditional Hebrew text as "handed down" (the basic meaning of "Masoretic") from the earlier Hebrew scribes, who had in turn meticulously copied the ancient Hebrew manuscripts, scrupulously guarding against error. There seems no good reason why the Masoretic text as preserved and codified in its present form by about 600 A.D., which has served as the basis for the King James translation, should not continue to be accepted as the most accurately preserved Old Testament portion of the Bible.Most scholars would agree that neither the Greek Septuagint nor the Latin Vulgate are comparable to the Masoretic Text in accuracy or reliability. As far as the Hebrew text changes proposed by Rudolf Kittel are concerned, it is worth noting that Kittel was a German rationalistic higher critic, rejecting Biblical inerrancy and firmly devoted to evolutionism.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Dead Sea Scrolls were produced by a heretical Jewish sect called the Essenes, but for the most part they do agree with the standard Masoretic Text.The two men most responsible for modern alterations in the New Testament text were B.F. Westcott and F.J.A. Hort, whose Greek New Testament text has largely replaced the traditional Textus Receptus in modern seminaries, especially as revised and updated by the Germans Eberhard Nestle and Kurt Aland. All of these men were evolutionists. Furthermore, Westcott and Hort, although they were Anglican officials and nominally orthodox in theology, both denied Biblical inerrancy and promoted spiritism and racism. Nestle and Aland, like Kittel, were Gemman theological liberals.Westcott and Hort were also the most influential members of the English revision committee that produced the English Revised Version of the Bible, published in 1881. The corresponding American revision committee which developed the American Standard Version of 1901 was headed by another liberal evolutionist, Philip Schaff.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most new versions since that time have adopted the same presuppositions as did those 19th century revisers. Schaff was twice tried for heresy by his denomination and taught at the very liberal Union Seminary. As chairman of the revision committee, Schaff not only was greatly influenced by Westcott and Hort, but also by the Unitarians Ezra Abbot and Joseph Thayer, of Harvard, as well as other liberals whom he placed on the committee.Furthermore, the changes adopted by the Westcott-Hort (or Nestle-Aland) Greek texts were predominantly based on two old Greek manuscripts, the so-called Sinaiticus and Vaticanus texts, which were rediscovered and rescued from long (and well-deserved) obscurity in the 19th century. Since these are both supposedly older than the more than 5000 manuscripts that support the Textus Receptus, they were accepted as "better." This was in spite of the fact that they frequently disagreed with each other as well as with the Textus Receptus, and also contained many serious and obvious omissions. The Vatican manuscript, for example, leaves out most of Genesis as well as all of Revelation, in addition to the pastoral epistles of Paul, 33 psalms, and over a third of Hebrews.The fact that these two manuscripts are older obviously does not prove they are better. More likely it indicates that they were set aside and not used because of their numerous gross errors. Thus they would naturally last longer than the good manuscripts which were being used regularly and thus wore out sooner.The Sinaitic manuscript was reportedly rescued from a wastebasket in a monastery on Mount Sinai by another German evolutionist theologian, Friedrich Tischendorf. The Orthodox monks evidently had long since decided that the numerous omissions and alterations in the manuscript had rendered it useless and had stored it away in some closet where it had remained unused for centuries.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yet Tischendorf promoted it widely and vigorously as representing a more accurate text than the thousands of manuscripts supporting the traditional Byzantine text. Furthermore, he assumed that it came from about the fourth century, but he never found any actual proof that it dated earlier than the 12th century.A similar mystery applies to the famous Vatican manuscript, which had been kept in seclusion in the Vatican Library since 1480 or earlier, though no one seemingly knows for sure when it was originally written or how it was acquired by the Vatican. Again, it was only conjectured to date from around the fourth century. Tischendorf learned of its existence and again was instrumental in promoting its antiquity and superiority to the Textus Receptus.There are a few other old manuscripts, even including fragmentary Greek papyri, whose textual character seems to conform more to the Sinaiticus and Vaticanus readings than to the Textus Receptus.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These all have been traced, by liberal and conservative scholars alike, to a probable source in Alexandria, Egypt, in the second or third century. At that time, Alexandria was a great center of both philosophical and theological scholarship, including a relatively large population of both Jews and Christians.The most influential man among the Christian community of Alexandria was the learned Origen, and it is believed by many that he was largely instrumental in developing the so-called "Alexandrian" text of the New Testament, of which the Vatican and Sinai manuscripts are representative, in contrast to the "Byzantine" text, from which the Textus Receptus has largely come. It is barely possible, some think, that Origen may also have been involved in developing the final form of the Septuagint translation of the Old Testament.With all his immense learning and zeal, however, it is sad that Origen's views of theology and Biblical interpretation were heretical in respect to numerous key doctrines. Like modern theistic evolutionists, he felt constrained to harmonize Christianity with pagan philosophy, especially that of Plato and the Stoics. This led him into excessive allegorization of Scripture, especially Genesis, and into denigrating the actual historical records of the Bible, even that of the bodily resurrection of Christ, as well as the literal creation of the world.Whether or not Origen and his associates were first responsible for the differences in the Alexandrian text from the Byzantine, the fact remains that significant differences do exist, and that practically all modern English translations have been heavily influenced (via Westcott/Hort, etc.) in favor of the former, whereas the King James translation has its basis primarily in the latter.In many cases, the differences are minor, but it is true that far too many do involve significant watering down of even such basic doctrines as Biblical inerrancy, the perfect divine/human nature of Christ, and the Trinity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the other hand, they certainly do not eliminate these doctrines, so it is still happily possible to discern these doctrines and to find the true gospel and way of salvation in almost any of the new texts or translations.In any case, one of the serious problems with almost all modern English translations is that they rely heavily on Hebrew and Greek manuscripts of the Bible developed by liberals, rationalists, and evolutionists, none of whom believed in the verbal inspiration of the Bible.Are we to believe that God would entrust the preservation of His eternal Word to men such as these? Would He not more likely have used devout scholars who believed in the absolute inerrancy and authority of the Bible?What About the Archaic Language in the King James? The beautifully poetic prose of the King James is a great treasure which should not be lost or forgotten. It has been acclaimed widely as the greatest example of English literature ever written. Apart from a few archaic words or words whose meaning has changed, which can easily be clarified in footnotes, it is as easy to understand today as it was four hundred years ago. That is why the common people today, especially those without higher education, still use and love it. It is usually the "intelligentsia" who tend to favor the modern versions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These modern translations commonly tend to use long words and pedantic rhetoric, but the King James uses mostly one and two-syllable words. Formal studies have always shown its readability index to be 10th grade or lower. There is nothing hard to understand about John 3:16, for example, or Genesis 1:1, or the Ten Commandments, in the King James.There are some sections of the Bible, of course, that are quite complex in the original language and thus a faithful translation should preserve that same complexity (after all God inspired it that way), but all the basic histories, doctrines, and precepts are easy to follow by anyone who can read at high school level. Many sections can easily be read by children as soon as they learn to read at all. In fact, in earlier times here in America, children were actually taught to read by means of the King James Bible.It is also noteworthy that the King James was produced during the period when the English language and literature (as well as knowledge of other languages by English-speaking people) had reached their zenith of power and expressiveness. That was the age of Shakespeare, for example.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Modern English, on the other hand, has become merely a decadent remnant of its former beauty and clarity.This phenomenon seems to be a universal characteristic of languages as well as people, cities, and institutions of all kinds. A period of youthful growth and vigor reaches a zenith and is then followed by a gradual decline and eventual death. Albert Baugh, in a widely used textbook on this theme has said:The evolution of languages, at least within the historical period, is a story of progressive simplification.... Language may reintroduce previously lost complexity but over-all the superfluous and redundant aspects are systematically streamlined from the complex structure of language. (A History of the English Language New York. Appleton Century-Crofts, 1957. p. 10.)This trend is exactly opposite to any evolutionary concept of language origins, but is analogous to the law of entropy in the physical realm.With respect to the English language, the authors of a more recent study, companion to a PBS television series, note the literary accomplishments of the Elizabethan period in England as follows.The achievements of these astonishing years [i.e., 1558-1625, the reigns of Queen Elizabeth and King James I] are inescapably glorious. Elizabeth I came to the throne in 1558 at the age of twenty-five. William Shakespeare, her most famous subject, was born six years later in 1564. Her successor, James I, who gave his name to another famous masterpiece, the Authorized Version of the Bible, died in 1625. During their reigns, about seventy years, the English language achieved a richness and vitality of expression that even contemporaries marveled at. (Robert McCrum, William Cray and Robert MacNeil, The Story of English New York, Viking. 1986. p. 91.)These writers call the King James Bible "probably the single most influential book ever published in the English language" (ibid., p. 109).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They also make an important observation concerning the beautiful simplicity of the King James Language.The King James Bible was published in the year Shakespeare began work on his last play, The Tempest. Both the play and the Bible are masterpieces of English, but there is one crucial difference between them. Whereas Shakespeare ransacked the lexicon, the King James Bible employs a bare 8000 words-God's teaching in homely English for every-man. From that day to this, the Shakespearean cornucopia and the Biblical iron rations represent, as it were, the North and South poles of the language, reference points for writers and speakers throughout the world, from the Shakespearean splendor of a Joyce or a Dickens to the Biblical rigor of a Bunyan or a Hemingway (ibid., p. 113).It is no wonder that a Bible translation produced at that special time in history has (except for changes in spelling and letter form) endured for almost 400 years, meeting the needs and guiding the culture of over ten generations of English speaking peoples. In fact, it has been very instrumental in standardizing the language itself, providing a common bond among its millions of readers, and restraining what would otherwise have been a more rapid deterioration of the language.We have abandoned today many fine points of English grammar commonly used in 1600. For example, we forget that "thee," "thou," and "thine" were used to express the second person singular, with "you," "ye," and "yours" reserved for second person plural. Today we use "you" indiscriminately for both singular and plural, thereby missing some of the precise meaning of many texts of Scripture. The same applies to the "th" and "st" endings on verbs associated with second-person pronouns; they also contribute significantly to the musical quality of the language, especially as used in the King James Bible.The translators were not only Biblical scholars but accomplished writers, and one of the deliberate goals, in fact, a part of their assignment, was to produce a Bible that would "sing" with beauty and power, and would also retain literal faithfulness to the Greek and Hebrew texts, which had themselves been written with majestic musical beauty.This they did accomplish, most admirably, and modern versions are without exception inferior to the King James Bible in this regard.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The King James is also the most reliably accurate of all translations, seeking to translate the words of the original rather than "dynamically equivalent" thoughts. This aspect allows detailed word study and comparisons which are hardly possible in most other versions.With all these factors in mind, do we not most honor the Lord and His revealed Word by having it read and used in that form of our language which was in use when the English language was at its best, instead of in our modern jargon? So what if it does not sound like a modern newspaper or novel? The fact is, it should not sound-like that, for God is speaking! His Word should be distinctly different from that in some current novel or newspaper.Conclusion I believe, therefore, after studying, teaching, and loving the Bible for over 55 years, that Christians -- especially creationists! -- need to hang on to their old King James Bibles as long as they live. God has uniquely blessed it in the history of England and America, in the great revivals, in the worldwide missionary movement, and in the personal lives of believers more than He has through all the rest of the versions put together.The King James Bible is the most beautiful, the most powerful, and (I strongly believe) the most reliable of any that we have or ever will have, until Christ returns.Postscript This brief article is only a very inadequate introduction to a large and important subject.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many excellent books and journal articles have been written on this vital theme and much of the discussion in this booklet is based on material covered in these other more authoritative publications. I have no training or experience personally with the Hebrew and Greek manuscripts and do not wish to argue the subject with any who disagree with my reasons.Many other Bible-believing creationist Christians also prefer to use the King James, but we do not regard its use as a test of salvation or spirituality. This essay is intended merely to answer questions as to why I, as well as many others, will continue to use the time-tested King James Bible in our writing and speaking.&lt;br /&gt;*Dr. Morris was Founder and President Emeritus of ICR.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_kjv/"&gt;http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_kjv/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Further Reading Bible versions Your Questions answered&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.chick.com/search/searchask/questionans.asp?Srch=EKJB"&gt;http://www.chick.com/search/searchask/questionans.asp?Srch=EKJB&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THE DEVIL IS COUNTEFEITING OUR ONLY WEAPON&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2007/04/devil-is-counterfeiting-our-only-weapon.html"&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2007/04/devil-is-counterfeiting-our-only-weapon.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;THE NEW KING JAMES COUNTERFEIT &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2007/01/new-king-james-version-nkjv-devils.html"&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2007/01/new-king-james-version-nkjv-devils.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Did the Catholics give us the bible &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/kjb_from_catholics.htm"&gt;http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/kjb_from_catholics.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Roman Catholic cult&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.biblebelievers.com/FalseDoctrine.html"&gt;http://www.biblebelievers.com/FalseDoctrine.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;History of Roman Catholicism, heresies and scandals of Rome &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2006/12/history-of-papacy-heresies-of-rome.html"&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2006/12/history-of-papacy-heresies-of-rome.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CULT INVASION&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2007/03/cult-invasion-preacher-calls-himself.html"&gt;http://watchmanafrica.blogspot.com/2007/03/cult-invasion-preacher-calls-himself.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2762831450212540565-8464324040199906476?l=takeheedafrica.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/feeds/8464324040199906476/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2762831450212540565&amp;postID=8464324040199906476' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/8464324040199906476'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/8464324040199906476'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/2008/03/changing-bible.html' title='CHANGING THE BIBLE'/><author><name>kizito Michael George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15869465479590651802</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2762831450212540565.post-7822962444949157835</id><published>2008-03-26T01:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-03-31T07:22:43.387-07:00</updated><title type='text'>RICK WARREN'S PURPOSE DRIVEN LIES(RUBBISH) EXPOSED</title><content type='html'>&lt;strong&gt;WAIT A MINUTE: COMPARE RICK WARREN’S BOOK WITH THE IDEAS OF JUNG THE PAGAN PSYCHOLOGIST &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacredsandwich.com/warren_jung_chart.htm#warrenjung"&gt;http://www.sacredsandwich.com/warren_jung_chart.htm#warrenjung&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rick Warren’s Purpose Driven Lies Exposed&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.abrahamic-faith.com/False-Teachers.html"&gt;http://www.abrahamic-faith.com/False-Teachers.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Spirit Led or Purpose driven&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cuttingedge.org/articles/db035.htm"&gt;http://www.cuttingedge.org/articles/db035.htm&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;CRITICAL RESOURCES ON RICK WARREN'S PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.christian-witness.org/docs/WarrenResources.doc &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;“THE PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE”IS DANGEROUS“THE PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE”USES MARXIST IDEOLOGY AND LANGUAGE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Copyright 2008&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lorendavis.com/news_articles_pdl.html"&gt;http://www.lorendavis.com/news_articles_pdl.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Loren Davis America and the world is under a grave threat of losing its freedom. One unexpected source that this threat is coming from is the Purpose Driven Life movement promoted by a prominent Baptist pastor named Rick Warren. He is famous for being the author of the Purpose Driven Life book that has sold an astonishing 25,000,000 copies worldwide. His Purpose Driven Life movement, has spread through churches promising church growth, and has taken over most Christian denominations. He boasts of training 500,000 pastors; reaches out to Muslims and other religions; is a personal friend and confidant to presidents and major business leaders of the world; and is now even developing Purpose Driven Nations. I will make a case that Rick Warren is yet another dangerous example of an anti-Christian movement coming incredibly this time from within Christianity itself. Not only is he seeking domination over Christianity, but is becoming a threat even attacking the heart of our freedom. My purpose for writing this is to arm people with facts and information as well as challenging them to question and seek out truth for themselves, and take a stand against the teachings of PDL and those like it. If we refuse to think, we will lose our precious freedom.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;MY CASEThe ‘Purpose Driven Life’ uses the same language and philosophy as Karl Marx’s ‘Communist Manifesto’. There are some tell tale footprints, and ideological DNA. Definition from Webster’s dictionary: com·mu·nism 1840 a: a theory advocating elimination of private property b: a system in which goods are owned in common and are available to all as needed c: a doctrine based on revolutionary Marxian socialism and Marxism-Leninism that was the official ideology of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics d: a totalitarian system of government in which a single authoritarian party controls state-owned means of production e: a final stage of society in Marxist theory in which the state has withered away and economic goods are distributed equitably e: &lt;a href="http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/communist" target="_blank"&gt;communist&lt;/a&gt; systems collectively Amazingly, like Karl Marx, Rick Warren also calls his Purpose-Driven Life a ‘MANIFESTO’. &lt;a href="http://www.purposedrivenlife.com/thebook.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;www.purposedrivenlife.com/thebook.aspx&lt;/a&gt; Rick Warren uses Lenin and Hitler as examples of how to promote his Purpose Driven Life movement.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Note: Nazi Germany was also a socialist nation. Why would Rick Warren use Lenin and Hitler who were brutal dictators as positive examples of how to implement his program? (Rick Warren, July 2005 at the Baptist World Alliance). The main issue here is the choice to live in a free society which emphasizes INDIVIDUALISM, free enterprise, capitalism, or in a COMMUNIST SOCIETY which emphasizes COMMUNAL LIVING, SOCIALISM and state control. FOR EXAMPLE, THE PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE ADVOCATES COMMUNITY and is AGAINST INDIVIDUALISM. *Rick Warren does this in the name of religion, but in reality he is using the church to revive the old ambitious Marxist ideology and agenda that was defeated on the battlefield and bankrupted nations. The word ‘COMMUNISM’ comes from its root word ‘COMMUNITY’. RICK WARREN’S USAGE OF THE WORD ‘COMMUNITY’ in ‘The Purpose Driven Life’ PDL, p. 127, 152, 316 “Cultivating ‘COMMUNITY’ takes CONFIDENTIALITY” *Does that mean you become a neighborhood spy? “GIVE UP YOUR OWN AGENDA FOR ‘COMMUNITY’ AGENDA”. *(In reality, them means following his agenda, not yours) That is the same thing Hitler, Stalin and Mao Tsu Tung told their nations before they led them to ruin and death.*Where there is FREEDOM there is individualism*Under Communism-Community or communal living-there is no personal freedom Rick Warren p. 145 “Community requires Commitment” PDL, p. 151 “Community means giving up your SELF-CENTEREDNESS AND INDEPENDENCE in order to become ‘INTERDEPENDENT’.” “The benefit of sharing together far outweighs the cost” *When he says give up your self centeredness, what he is saying is be society centered, altruistic or socialistic. *Giving up your independence means, GIVING UP YOUR FREEDOM. Freedom is what America is all about. (Of course this does not mean we do not care for others who are less fortunate). *Saying we must become ‘INTERDEPENDENT’. ‘Interdependent’ is the antithesis of being ‘independent’. ‘Interdependent’ is the language of the U.N. which is derived from Marxist socialism. (The Millennium World Peace Summit in September 7, 2000. UNESCO on religions role in the culture of peace.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/TwoSummits.htm" target="_blank"&gt;www.crossroad.to/articles2/TwoSummits.htm&lt;/a&gt;) *When he talks about THE COST of ‘SHARING TOGETHER’ (‘sharing’ in this context is just another way of saying socialism, communism). I am not just talking about a hostile takeover of Christianity, but a loss of freedom as a nation. PDL, p. 81 "YOU DON’T HAVE TO ALWAYS BE 'IN CHARGE'” If I am not in charge of my life, WHO IS?” Big brother? If you don’t make decisions for your life, someone else will. We would be treated like children. This would be the end of freedom and of any independent thinking. Others would be in charge of our destiny. PDL 134 “WE ARE ACCOUNTABLE TO EACH OTHER” PDL, p. 140 “The Bible commands MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY”. *The Bible does not teach that. It says we are accountable to God. That is a watchdog mentality like the Nazis and Communists have. You are always looking over your shoulder. We are only accountable to Christ, our spouse, boss, and government. Romans 14:12 “Everyone of us shall give ACCOUNT OF HIMSELF TO GOD.”Jesus said regarding governments, Mk. 12:17 “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s”. This means we are to obey those in authority as long as they do not violate God’s Word. The word ‘government’ and ‘the state’ I use interchangeably. What I am talking about here is the church and state becoming totalitarian, communist. Now it not only controls the economy, taking from the rich and giving to the poor. It alone dictates the belief system, which ultimately leads to atheism. Rick Warren says, p. 134-5 “WE ARE CALLED AND COMMANDED TO BE INVOLVED IN EACH OTHER’S LIVES.” NO! The Bible speaks against being a ‘busy body’. I Tim. 5:13 “And withal they learn to be idle, wandering about from house to house; and not only idle, but tattlers also and busybodies, speaking things which they ought not.” Rick Warren’s statement is the same mentality of the Marxists. We are to be good neighbors, but should keep out of each others business and affairs. Prov 26:17 “He that passeth by, and meddleth with strife belonging not to him, is like one that taketh a dog by the ears.” KJV The Bible teaches we are to have compassion on those in need and help one another, but it is totally a voluntary action from the heart and not mandatory or centrally controlled. John 13:34 “A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another” KJV *Some scriptures have been abused to teach ‘liberation theology’, communism.&lt;br /&gt;THE PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE USES GLOBALIST LANGUAGEGlobalism is the uniting of nations economically, culturally, ideologically, ecologically, politically and militarily which would ultimately be managed under a one world government. Under Globalism, nations will lose their sovereignty, and individuals their freedom. Remember, Marxist Communism’s goal has always been to conquer and rule the whole world. Despite what we have been told that Communism is dead, that communistic dream is still very much alive. They are just using different tactics and disguises now. Oct. 27, 2003 Rick Warren’s e-mail entitled GOD’S DREAM FOR YOU—AND THE WORLD. *He is misusing Christ’s Great Commission of Mark 16:15 to promote the globalists political agenda which is against Christ and the Bible. His idea of the Great Commission has nothing to do with Christ’s recorded in Mark 16:15. PDL, p. 298, 300 “THINK GLOBALLY”.&lt;br /&gt;REPROGRAMMING, SUBLIMINAL BRAIN WASHINGRick Warren “by a COMPLETE CHANGE OF MIND” RW p. 43. Why do we need a complete change of mind? That translates that we are to give up everything we have believed and held dear in the past. That would mean that we would no longer believe in individualism; capitalism; or freedom. To completely change our mind would mean that now we become socialists; don’t believe the Bible; don’t believe that Jesus is the only way to heaven; and ultimately, become atheists. PDL, p. 286 “To fulfill your mission will require that YOU ABANDON YOUR AGENDA” *This is not in the scriptures. *It’s one thing to surrender to God’s will in your life, but it’s a whole new ball game to give control of your life to another man or institution. It is a Marxist mentality which says we should give up our agenda for the state’s or church’s agenda. His philosophy is that our purpose for living is to serve the church or state, not the state or church’s purpose is to serve the people. In the U.S. Constitution is says, “The government is FOR THE PEOPLE, by the people”. The people were never to exist FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE GOVERNMENT. America was founded by people who were fleeing the tyranny of the church and state and wanting to live free. PDL, p. 83 “GIVE UP YOUR WILL” What an incredible statement. This is exactly what is espoused by the Communist Manifesto. We are to seek the will of God, but nothing in the Bible infers that we are to ‘give up our will’. God Himself gives us a choice. To tell people to give up their will means you want to control their lives and manipulate them. That is how a child is treated. It is evil and deadly for the state, a pastor or a church to demand people to ‘give up their wills’. Then people would be nothing but zombies whose purpose is just to facilitate the will of those in power. It appears one of his objectives is to bring the protestants under a central control just like the Roman Catholic Church, where the church dominates the lives of its parishioners. This would make him the protestant pope, defining the faith and enforcing the church’s will, as he defines it. PDL, p. 83 “TAKE YOUR HANDS OFF THE STEERING WHEEL” This statement has far reaching implications. It translates that you should let someone else take control of your life. YOU ALONE SHOULD BE THE DECISION MAKER OF YOUR LIFE. It’s bad enough to make your own mistakes, let alone allowing someone else make mistakes on your behalf or USE YOU. Joshua 24:15 “Choose this day whom you will serve”. This shows God honors our will. Communist societies are dictatorial. In China, families are only allowed to have one child. Any more pregnancies must be aborted by law; the Bible is outlawed; there is no freedom of worship; freedom of speech; or freedom of the press. The state is in total control of what is done and said publicly. Rick Warren is advocating that the pastors be given absolute authority over their congregations. This explains why pastors have flocked to his program. This is just a conditioning interim step towards absolute state control over the masses, micro-managing our lives.&lt;br /&gt;RICK WARREN’S PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE MOVEMENT IS A RELIGIO/POLITICAL MOVEMENT.Rick Warren says he has no political ambitions, but his teachings and activities betray him.&lt;br /&gt;Not only is he advocating uniting all churches to come under him and be Purpose Driven Churches.He is now having Purpose Driven Nations joining with presidents. He says Rwanda is the FIRST Purpose Driven Nation. Time Magazine, August 15, 2005. Other nations are to follow. For Rick Warren to be seeking to make all churches Purpose Driven and also national governments Purpose Driven is hard evidence that he is trying to bring the church and state together under the same tyrannical philosophical system. He is meeting with the U.N.; the Council of Foreign Relations, the CFR; major business leaders; and heads of state around the world. Believe me, these non-Christian leaders are not meeting with him to help him evangelize the world for Christ, but are using him to help implement their own political agendas. If they didn’t have common ground they wouldn’t be working with him. (google: Rick Warren CFR).&lt;br /&gt;Rick Warren describes the CHURCH as the REAL PEACE CORPS.PDL, p. 296. *The Peace Corps is a political organization, not a religious one. In the Bible, God never called his people to be a PEACE CORPS. He called us to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ to every creature.&lt;br /&gt;Rick Warren was invited by the U.N. and accepted, to come to the U.N.’s INTERFAITH PRAYER MEETING which was attended by leaders of Islam, Buddhism, Catholicism, Protestantism and every other faith. (Google: Rick Warren CFR, Rick Warren U.N. Interfaith Prayer Meeting). Since most of these religions don’t believe in Christ, it is clear this was not a Christian prayer meeting but was a guise to have a globalist political conference. The U.N. believes that religions must be pacified and brought into its fold in order to have world peace. The U.N.’s plan is to synthesize all religions into one, and Rick Warren seems to be the point man to facilitate this. That is why Rick Warren said, “The man of peace can even be a Moslem”. (google: Rick Warren Muslim man of peace)&lt;br /&gt;Rick Warren’s Global Peace Plan is virtually synonomous with the Peace Plans of the U.N. and the New Age Movement. (“Deceived on Purpose” p. 59 Warren Smith)&lt;br /&gt;THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES FOR PRESIDENT HILLARY CLINTON AND BARAK OBAMA SPOKE AT RICK WARREN’S SADDLE BACK CHURCH. Why? What does having the politicians speaking at his church have anything to do with bringing people to Christ and faith in the Bible? Why would a Christian pastor expose his people to and promote political candidates who openly stand against the Bibles teachings? , i.e: abortion, same sex marriage, etc. (google: Rick Warren I always own up to mistakes). Today it is vogue for politicians to attend “Christian” denominations and claim to be Christians, yet take positions that are diametrically opposed to the Bible and Christ. Furthermore, we have repeatedly been told that the church is supposed to stay out of politics. Where is the separation of church and state here? It appears the church and state are reunifying to gain power. Hillary Clinton’s book, “It takes a Village to Raise a Child”, is a socialistic concept. Her national health plan is SOCIALIZED MEDICINE. Is Rick Warren’s promotion of these politicians just coincidental, or indicative of their common socialistic agenda? Rick Warren himself baptized a homosexual activist. This is defying the Bible. (Google: Rick Warren I always own up to mistakes).&lt;br /&gt;RICK WARREN WAS INVITED TO SPEAK IN NORTH KOREA. (&lt;a href="http://www.abpnews.com/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.abpnews.com/&lt;/a&gt;) Why would an atheistic, socialist, Communist country that is very hostile to Christianity invite a Christian minister to speak to a large crowd in its country if they didn't have a common socialistic agenda? He says he is just an evangelist trying to get people to heaven, and that he has no political ambitions. (google: Rick Warren I always own up to my mistakes) He might be an evangelist, but not one in a biblical sense. If you follow his trail in Africa, his focus is not winning people to Christ. He is an evangelist trying to bring about social reform and globalism which have the exact same ideals as Marxism. If he can establish Marxism inside the church worldwide, communal life, socialism, communism, will easily takeover the whole world.&lt;br /&gt;HE IS PROMOTING SOCIAL PROGRAMS AND HUMANITARIANISM.In the article on Rick Warren in Time Magazine, August 15, 2005, Rick Warren says they are going to TRANSFORM THE CHURCHES in Rwanda into centers for feeding the poor; distributing medicine, and centers of education. No one is against helping people. We should help when there are natural disasters and famine. The reality is that Africa has the natural resources for the people to support themselves and Africans are smart and resourceful. What is wrong here is using humanitarianism as a carrot to gain political and economic control over the resources of Africa. There is a hidden agenda here. This is neo-colonization. (Read the article: ‘The Race for Africa’ www.lorendavis.com). The problem is that Rick Warren is seeking to transform churches from being spiritual institutions where people find salvation and are taught the Word of God into social institutions. This is a hostile secular takeover of Christ’s church in the name of humanitarinism. Now the church eventually will become a tool of the United Nations and other secular institutions who are adversarial to Christ and the Bible. Rick Warren says he is involved in The Great Commission. Mk. 16:15 is Christ’s Great Commission. What he is doing has nothing to do with Mark 16:15. Instead, he is using the church to promote a global social and political agenda. He has misrepresented and distorted Christ’s Great Commission for winning souls, to try to bring about a pseudo world peace the Bible warned about in Dan. 8:23-25. According to the Bible, this peace movement will usher in The Man of Peace, who will be a world dictator, the Antichrist. THE BIBLE FOREWARNS OF A WORLD GLOBAL SOCIALISTIC GOVERNMENT THAT IS COMING WHICH WILL BE GOVERNED BY A BRUTAL DICTATOR.&lt;br /&gt;THE BIBLE’S PROPHECY OF A ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT. Rev 13:7-8 “And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.” KJV *The world is literally going to accept the Antichrist, as the savior, because of his program to bring peace to the world. Dan 8:25 “And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.” KJV Rev 12:9 “And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth THE WHOLE WORLD:” KJV Rev 13:5 "And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast (the Antichrist): and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?” KJV&lt;br /&gt;ALL NATIONS ARE BECOMING INTERDEPENDENT ECONOMICALLY FOR SURVIVAL. THE BIBLE’S PROPHECY OF A GLOBAL SOCIALISTIC ECONOMIC SYSTEM IS FOUND IN: Rev 13:17-14:1 “And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.” (This is a socialistic economic system). Rev 19:20, “with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast,” KJV (&lt;a href="http://www.lorendavis.com/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.lorendavis.com/&lt;/a&gt; See the article: “Could the Verichip be the Mark of the Beast?”) Technologically things are now positioned to implement the Mark of the Beast for a world socialist government. At the United Nations’ Millinneum Conference in 2000, the U.N. asserted its ambition to be a central world government. They are already have a U.N. army. (google: The U.N. Millinneum Conference 2000) The U.N. is seeking to have the power to tax all nations. Rev 18:23 “…for by thy sorceries were ALL NATIONS deceived.”&lt;br /&gt;THE WHORE CHURCH’S POLITICAL AMBITIONSThe Bible speaks about the Whore Church that presents itself as the bride of Christ but is not, it is an imposter of Christ’s church. It tells of her political involvement with the kings of the earth. Rev 17:1-5 “…I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication. So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, FULL OF NAMES OF BLASPHEMY,” “And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.” KJV Rev 17:18-18:1 “And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.” Rev 18:7-9 And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived deliciously with her, shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning,” KJV In light of these scriptures, let’s analyze what Rick Warren is doing. Rick Warren, in the name of Christianity, is making alliances with not only church leaders, but also secular, business and political leaders. Church, business and political leaders all like his teachings because it gives them undisputed authoritarian control. The Fox News network aired twice on Christmas Eve and Christmas day twice 2007, a “Rick Warren Christmas Special’. As far as I have seen it is unprecedented for a secular major news network to give or sell an hour in prime time, or any other time, to a preacher or anyone else. Fox is a news network. This is not the first time Fox News has promoted him. They have given him other one hour specials in the past that have been re-aired many times. Since Fox is a non-Christian network, the question is why are they promoting a “Christian” preacher, Rick Warren? What is Fox’s agenda? What common agenda do Fox and Rick Warren have? For sure Fox’s agenda is not to win the world to Christ. Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world.” Rick Warren comes across smoothly as one who honors Jesus, but when one looks at his teachings and agenda, they are opposite of Christ’s and the Bible. Fox and Rick Warren are an unlikely coalition that has made strange bedfellows. Against all odds, the church, state and business are reuniting. What is their objective? Rick Warren is using an old sales tactic used by some unscrupulous salesmen of “bait and switch”: sell a person one thing, then when it is delivered give him something else. This is exactly what he is doing. He is using Jesus name to sell an agenda that is opposite of the Jesus of the Bible. An article in the Houston Chronicle, December 19, 2007 by Robert D. Novak, says that presidential contender Huckabee was a part of the liberal/secular faction in the Southern Baptist church and was involved in a big fight to take the Southern Baptists away from Bible believing conservatives. Rick Warren is part of this same liberal/secular faction in the Southern Baptist church. He says that he and Huckabee were classmates in graduate school and says Huckabee would make a great president. The Whore Church, secular and political leaders are using each other to advance their own agendas. According to the Bible the political ‘the beast’ will destroy the Whore church after it uses her. Rev. 17. This does not mean that Christians should not have a voice in government. It simply means they shouldn’t be hypocrites. The worst thing anyone could ever do is to use Christ’s name to promote his own personal or political agenda.&lt;br /&gt;RICK WARREN’S HARD SELLPDL, p. 146 “you’ll need to make some TOUGH CHOICES and TAKE SOME RISKS" Tough choices? Freedom or a totalitarian dictatorship? Is that really such a tough choice? Risks? Look at China, Russia, and Nazi Germany. Do we really need any more examples to see the end result of socialistic totalitarian societies? Who is willing to take that risk? It’s a loaded deck. When you have so many examples of how deadly an outcome this philosophy leads to, it is no longer a theory to what where it is going to lead to. The Bible says they are “ever learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.”&lt;br /&gt;THERE IS A PATTERNKhruchev of the Soviet Union predicted during the Cold War that they would take America from the inside and bury our grandchildren. For generations, American Universities have been teaching socialism and Marxism and incessantly attacking capitalism, the Bible and Christ. Evolution has been taught as fact; therefore, since we are just animals, immorality has become the rationale in the name of science and reason. Our educational system has taken control over our children from the parents and produced a generation of immoral, socialist atheists. Many who are Christians are Christian in name only. We have become technologically advanced and at the same time become a cesspool of immoral, unhappy people. The universities have been conditioning future leaders to be atheists and Marxist socialists. The TV networks, entertainment industry, and major book stores have put out works that incessantly attack the Bible, Jesus, morality and capitalism. This systematic coordinated strategy has been very effective conditioning the populace. This is a premeditated, long range, thought out plan of Karl Marx that is being implemented today. When the Soviet Union fell, it was pronounced that Communism was dead. It now appears like this was a Trojan horse. If one will look at the economic and military rise of Communist China; Cuba still remaining Communist; a revival of Communism in Russia; socialists now in power in most of western Europe; Marxists have taken Bolivia; socialism is rising in Mexico; Venezuela is moving toward Communism; the U.N. operates by Marxist ideology; and the rise of socialism in Canada and America, it doesn’t take a genius to figure out where this is headed. The globalsts are using Global Warming as a scare tactic to help facilitate this saying if we don’t unite and become one to stop Global Warming, we will all die. Of course we must take care of the environment. (See article: ‘Global Warming Related to Bible Prophecy’ &lt;a href="http://www.lorendavis.com/www.lorendavis.com"&gt;http://www.lorendavis.com/www.lorendavis.com&lt;/a&gt;). The pattern is clear to anyone who is knowledgeable; is not naïve; or who is not apart of this global socialistic plan. What looked like the demise of Communism with the fall of the Soviet Union, resurfaced in the U.N. with its ambition of being a socialist one world government. Now Marxism is accomplishing by peace what it never could by war. It appears that Rick Warren is working to remove biblical Christianity as the final obstruction to Marxist socialism and is bringing Christianity into the globalist socialist camp. He has been effective in doing this by doing it in the name of humanitarianism and inclusion, knowing that Christians are compassionate people.&lt;br /&gt;THE PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE’S MASTER WEB OF DECEITRick Warren has now declared that Fundamentalist Christianity is nearly dead. Fundamentalist Christianity is Bible Christianity which stands for the basic doctrines of Christ, 2 John 9. (May 23, 2005 Rick Warren, The Pew and Religious Forum). He uses fifteen translations or paraphrases in his PDL book. He often says, “The Bible says,” but which Bible? Since these fifteen translations or paraphrases disagree with each other, using all these translations has had the effect of “changing the Bible”, (see the article “Changing the Bible” &lt;a href="http://www.lorendavis.com/"&gt;http://www.lorendavis.com/&lt;/a&gt;), and removing the Bible as being the final authority or even being relevant to the Christian Faith. Using all these diverse translations makes the Bible inconsistent and intellectually a farce. By doing this, Rick Warren is neutralizing Christianty and has become as big an enemy of the Bible and Christianity as Karl Marx. He is a player. He knows exactly what he is doing, and so do the big boys who are promoting him. *2 Peter 3:16 “As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.” KJV PDL, p. 95 Rick Warren, “I DON’T UNDERSTAND IT BUT COUNT ME IN” This statement is referring to his PDL program. We don’t need to understand? Don’t think? Count me in even though I don’t understand? Trust me! Only a person with little or no knowledge of history; has no experience; or one who is very dependant; weak, brainwashed or naive is going to buy that line. Prov 2:11 “Discretion shall preserve thee, understanding shall keep thee:” I Jn 4:1 “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.”&lt;br /&gt;WE ARE IN GRAVE DANGER OF LOSING OUR FREEDOMWorld domination has been a goal of many totalitarians for centuries. Major industrialists have always financed such lofty ambitions of political leaders for world conquest to increase their own wealth and power. If we don’t wake up, the same merciless purging and enslavement that happened to Nazi Germany, Communist Russia and China will happen to the U.S. and the rest of the world. We are under grave threat of not only losing true biblical Christianity, but also our freedom and liberty which so many have paid such a dear price for. There is a reason Christianity and America have changed. It hasn’t happened just by coincidence.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2762831450212540565-7822962444949157835?l=takeheedafrica.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/feeds/7822962444949157835/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2762831450212540565&amp;postID=7822962444949157835' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/7822962444949157835'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2762831450212540565/posts/default/7822962444949157835'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://takeheedafrica.blogspot.com/2008/03/rick-warrens-purpose-driven-liesrubbish.html' title='RICK WARREN&apos;S PURPOSE DRIVEN LIES(RUBBISH) EXPOSED'/><author><name>kizito Michael George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15869465479590651802</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2762831450212540565.post-6975016447559002600</id><published>2008-03-26T00:59:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-03-28T08:09:43.096-07:00</updated><title type='text'>UNDERSTADING THE HISTORY OF THE BIBLE</title><content type='html'>BY SAMUEL G.GIPP, 1987&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;http://www.chick.com/reading/books/157/157cont.asp&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;http://www.chick.com/catalog/books/1252.asp&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dedicated to Matthew 7:17,18&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After you read this book you will understand wHY?&lt;br /&gt;The following online edition of this book is from the previous printing. The edition available for ordering now contains much more material&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From: http://www.chick.com/reading/books/157/157cont.asp&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Contents&lt;br /&gt;PrefaceIntroduction&lt;br /&gt;Time Trip&lt;br /&gt;Where Do We Go From Here&lt;br /&gt;The Ground Rules&lt;br /&gt;The 100 Year War&lt;br /&gt;The Localities&lt;br /&gt;The Witnesses&lt;br /&gt;The Enemy&lt;br /&gt;Westcott and Hort&lt;br /&gt;The Authorized Version&lt;br /&gt;Vindicated&lt;br /&gt;Bibliography&lt;br /&gt;Footnotes&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Preface&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Where is the Bible? How did we get it? These questions, though simple, have baffled the mind of man for years. Even Christians today wonder if they really have the Word of God. Most Christians are interested in how the Bible came to us through history.&lt;br /&gt;Many authors, in an attempt to explain how we got our Bible, have clouded the issue in the gray language of the scholar's union, causing more puzzled looks than answered questions.&lt;br /&gt;You will find that this book is, as its name implies, An Understandable History of the Bible. For seven years it has been "field tested" in the hands of the common man. From steel worker to Greek scholar, from housewife to missionary, all have been im- pressed by its easily understood style.&lt;br /&gt;You, dear reader, may find the answer to many of the questions you have about the word of God. You will certainly find it educational. After all, it was written for you.&lt;br /&gt;Samuel C. Gipp, Th.D.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Introduction&lt;br /&gt;There are just two kinds of Christians. (Are all saved or not? We cannot tell; only God knows the heart.)&lt;br /&gt;One kind is that earnest, honest number who are ever anxious to have the FACTS of a vital issue so they may talk intelligently and stand for the TRUTH.&lt;br /&gt;The second kind are that multitude of Christians (fundamentalists for the most part) who just do not wish to be confused by the FACTS.&lt;br /&gt;Lenin, one of the founders of communism, for once told the truth when he said, "Facts are stubborn things." Indeed they are. There are so many plain FACTS favoring the King James Version as being nearest by far to the originals (which it IS) and far, FAR more accurate and authoritative than all of the modern versions combined (which it IS), that it is indeed a riddle wrapped up in a puzzle how so many truly born again, blood bought Christians, when presented with the FACTS, become angry or sarcastic and just do not wish to be confused by the FACTS.&lt;br /&gt;IF, kind reader, you are the latter, may I be so bold as to suggest, if not urge, that you waste no time reading further. This book is filled from end to end with FACTS that are fully documented and they bring the whole Bible version issue into clear-cut focus. There are no "gray" sections to it, it is all black and white.&lt;br /&gt;I confess there was a time in my ministry when I extolled, read from, and recommended from the pul- pit some Bible version that had just been published, solemnly stating, "This is the nearest to the originals...easier to read...clarifies difficult phrases that are weighed down with archaic words which need to be eliminated so the sense will be better under- stood." When the Holy Spirit convicted me of this sin, I asked His forgiveness, and He gave it.&lt;br /&gt;I keep always in mind, and REmind as many as possible, that we face as of NOW the most vicious and malicious attempted assassination of the character, the name, the Word of God ever done on planet Earth since those blasphemous words were first uttered in Eden, "YEA, HATH GOD SAID?"&lt;br /&gt;I have spoken to many in meetings in this country and Canada and have stated flatly that this is a life and death matter, for IF we do not have an infallible, pure, inerrant Holy Word of God NOW (NOT in the originals which have been lost forever centuries ago) to rest our weary souls upon for time and eternity, THEN we have but one alternative or option, "Let's eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die and go to hell."&lt;br /&gt;I also keep issuing a friendly warning - IF you SEE this issue and take your stand openly and unashamedly for the King James Version as being your final, absolute Authority, the true Holy Word of God, THEN you will lose friends and make enemies. I gladly add that I keep on finding the NEW friends I have made because of this issue, I would not exchange for the old friends I may have lost - FOR ANYTHING!&lt;br /&gt;Some fifty years ago or more when I entered the ministry, I knew THEN as I know NOW I had the final absolute Authority from God Himself to guide me through this dark tunnel called LIFE, beset on every side by Satanic traps. If I had not known this for sure, I NEVER would have been a minister. I refuse to play the hypocrite.&lt;br /&gt;Without God's true, inerrant Word and His eternal Son the Lord Jesus Christ, "GOD MANIFEST IN THE FLESH" Who has saved me by his grace and has done so much for me, and still does, and will do throughout the long reaches of eternity, I say without these two ironclad, life-giving FACTS, THEN the Bard of Avon would be absolutely right when he defines LIFE in one of his plays;&lt;br /&gt;"LIFE IS A TALE TOLD BY AN IDIOT, FULL OF SOUND AND FURY, SIGNIFYING - NOTHING!"&lt;br /&gt;Dr. David Otis Fuller&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chapter 1:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Time Trip!&lt;br /&gt;Imagine for a moment that we are in a different time period. We have gone back thousands of years. There are no cars. There are no airplanes. There are no modern conveniences. We are in primitive times.&lt;br /&gt;We take a look around us. There is no Bible. We know nothing about the universe around us. We have no knowledge of God. We don't know how mankind got here.&lt;br /&gt;Then we look again. We see a seed fall from a tree and from the top of the soil, plant itself, tend to its self, raise itself up into a seedling and mature into a tree, only to repeat the cycle all over again. And we wonder.&lt;br /&gt;Then we go to the ocean. We study the tides and discover that they are used to clean the waters, making it impossible to support life without them. We look and ask ourselves, "Was this planned?"&lt;br /&gt;We look beneath the surface of the water, to the depths below. We find life. Strange creatures! Some which breathe water and some which breathe air like us. Some that spawn eggs. Some that give birth to living young. We see creatures of all different shapes and sizes. Some are very small. Some are so huge that they weigh many tons. Some go fishing with a worm attached to their own fishing pole. Some have no eyes. Some have their eyes out on stalks. Some carry lights with them. Some move very slowly. Some dart about almost too fast for our eyes to follow. Again, we wonder. How did this come into being?&lt;br /&gt;Then we look overhead. We see the birds. They fly yet are never taught. They move through the air with grace and precision. Their bones are hollow to give them the light weight suitable for flight. Their feathers all grow in the right places. They migrate to the same place every year. They possess innate abilities and characteristics required for their survival. And again we wonder. Could this "just happen?"&lt;br /&gt;Then we look at ourselves, at our bodies. We study the intricacies of the eye and how it works. We examine the complex mechanisms of the ear. We marvel at our ability to keep our balance; to speak; to walk. We look at the heart, that marvelous muscle whose valves know when to open and when to close. It starts functioning without our help and stops itself in spite of all we can do to prevent it. We look to the nervous system and the brain. How did all of this come about? Was it created by accidents?&lt;br /&gt;We put forth our questions to our contemporaries. They have no satisfactory answers.&lt;br /&gt;Where is God?&lt;br /&gt;IS there a being greater than we are? One who made all of these marvelous things that we have looked at? If there were a being greater than we, where would He be? We look to the ground. No, He is not there. We scan the ocean. He is not there either, for both of these are limited, and they could not contain so great a Being. Anything that could create the marvelous works that we find all around us could only come (and we look upward) from the seemingly unlimited sky!&lt;br /&gt;We look to the sky. Is there Something up there? Something that is watching us even now? Something that created this whole universe and set it in motion?&lt;br /&gt;But wait. If there is Something up there, if there is a Supreme Being, He must know us! He must know what is happening on this earth. He must know our problems and have the answers for them. And if this is so, and He sees our helpless state, He is indebted to us, His creatures. As our Creator, He must help us with our troubles, assist us through this life, and see to it that we find a way to reach Him. He must communicate.&lt;br /&gt;The Communication!&lt;br /&gt;We can call to the heavens. We can climb the mountains in an attempt to be nearer. We can pray. But in all of this, we can only send words in one direction. He must communicate with us! He must send words to us. He must establish reliable communications with us. But how? Suddenly it happens. As we walk down the road toward home, far down in the distance we see a figure. That figure is shouting and causing a stir. He has an air of excitement about him. As we draw nearer we can hear him shouting, and as we get closer still we can make out what he is saying.&lt;br /&gt;"Make straight the way of the Lord!" We stop him. "What did you say?"&lt;br /&gt;"Make straight the way of the Lord!"&lt;br /&gt;"Who is the Lord?" we ask.&lt;br /&gt;"The Lord, the Lord God of heaven..."&lt;br /&gt;Of Heaven! Quickly we glance up. He has sent someone! We must find out more!&lt;br /&gt;"Tell us more about this 'Lord'," we ask.&lt;br /&gt;"The Lord God of Heaven! The Creator of the Universe!"&lt;br /&gt;We look to the heavens again. We fall on our knees. God has communicated! We grasp this figure!&lt;br /&gt;"Tell me! Tell me of this God! Tell me of this Creator!"&lt;br /&gt;"Tell you? You have no need that I tell you, for it is written right here in this Book. For if all you ever knew about God was what I said, there would be no way to verify it. But if God is God, He must put His Word in writing, so that we may have it long after His prophets are gone."&lt;br /&gt;Then he pulls from his belongings a volume of a book. We look at it. Writing! Our God writes!&lt;br /&gt;"How did these things come to be?" we ask.&lt;br /&gt;"Holy men of God wrote as they were moved by the Holy Ghost," he replies.&lt;br /&gt;Now we hold in our hands communication from our Creator. He has spanned time and space and worked through men. He has communicated! He had a message for us but did not keep it locked in heaven, for He sent it to earth. He has sent that message in plain black and white so that we could keep it and study it. His obligation was to communicate. Our obligation is to accept that communication; to read that communication; to obey that communication. Without that communication, we have no connection to this God Who is the Creator of the universe. If these are not His words, we have no hope.&lt;br /&gt;We have known that He existed for so long. But now we hold in our hand His Word. He has communicated!&lt;br /&gt;The Questioner&lt;br /&gt;But wait! No sooner do we acquire this precious communication than a shadowy figure arrives on the scene.&lt;br /&gt;"Yea, hath God said? That isn't the Word of God. That only contains the words of God. That only holds His thoughts, not His very words. Oh there may be a few fundamental doctrines that you can pretend to believe. But surely you don't believe that these are God's very words? Don't be a fanatic. Settle for just a few accurate passages."&lt;br /&gt;We find ourselves shocked. Our new found faith assailed! Our confidence shaken! Then our true prophet explains.&lt;br /&gt;"He is an unbeliever. He does not believe that God has the power to write this Book perfectly. And, even worse, he is struck with fear when he discovers anyone who does, so he tries to destroy their faith in it."&lt;br /&gt;"Why doesn't he just give in and believe it?" we ask.&lt;br /&gt;"Pride," explains our prophet.&lt;br /&gt;Back Home&lt;br /&gt;Now we are transported back to our present day. Times and surroundings have changed. The tattered old volume we held in our hand has become a black, leather covered book with gilt-edged pages and two precious words printed on the cover, "Holy Bible."&lt;br /&gt;Our prophet now stands before us. A look of determination on his face. He speaks.&lt;br /&gt;"This is the Bible. This is God's Word and God's words. Believe it. Read it. Practice it. This Book will lead you; strengthen you; impower you. It is God's Word."&lt;br /&gt;We open it up and look gratefully at its pages. It is so easy to read now. So orderly. The Word of God. My, how He must love us to have written all of this. My, what power He must have to have brought it through a history that has always been hostile to it, preserve it perfectly, and put it here in our hands!&lt;br /&gt;The Questioner Returns&lt;br /&gt;Suddenly someone speaks.&lt;br /&gt;"Yea hath God said?"&lt;br /&gt;"What?" We look up. He is a fine looking man, well dressed and obviously quite educated.&lt;br /&gt;"I hate to disillusion you, but actually that is not God's word. That only contains a mere translation of the Word of God, and a poor one at that. Oh, you can find the fundamentals in it, but surely you don't believe that those are God's very words? Please, your lack of proper education is showing. Don't be a fanatic. Settle for a few accurate passages, but don't be a fool and hurt the cause of Christ by saying that God preserved His very words. Grow up."&lt;br /&gt;We find ourselves shocked. Our faith is being assailed. But wait a minute. As our verbal intruder walks away, the lesson that we learned earlier strikes home.&lt;br /&gt;"Wow! Those unbelievers are everywhere," we say to our prophet with a sigh of relief.&lt;br /&gt;"They certainly are quick to try to destroy a person's faith in the Bible. I hope he gets saved someday."&lt;br /&gt;"What do you mean?" replies our prophet. "That guy was a Christian, a college graduate. He believes that God wrote this Book perfectly a few thousand years ago, but he doesn't believe that God had the power to preserve it through the centuries and give it to you and me perfectly in English. What's worse yet, he is struck with fear when he finds someone who does, so he tries to destroy their faith in it."&lt;br /&gt;"But why doesn't he just give in and believe it?"&lt;br /&gt;"Pride."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chapter 2:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Where Do We Go From Here?&lt;br /&gt;There is a controversy raging today across America and around the world. Where is the Word of God?&lt;br /&gt;Answers to that question come in all shapes and sizes. Some say that we do not have the Word of God anywhere in this world. Others say that it is found in the Bible but is only that portion that "speaks" to the individual. Some say it lies hidden, locked up in the ancient languages in which it was originally written. Some say we have every word wrapped up in one volume. Still others say that our English translations are reliable but faulty at best. Where is the Word of God?&lt;br /&gt;This is an age of change and confusion. The world without Christ is lost in a turmoil of fear and indecision. Yet to this world, we Christians who have trusted Christ as our personal Saviour, are taking, and have been taking for many centuries, a message of hope, Jesus Christ.&lt;br /&gt;We make many claims for this Saviour of all mankind. We claim that He was all man, and yet He was every bit God. We claim that He was begotten by God through a virgin. We claim that he lived among men for over thirty years but never once committed a sin. We all know of His death on the cross. It is we Christians, however, who claim that His death was not a symbolic gesture of a rebel dying for a "cause," but instead we say that it was part of a masterful plan by God Himself through which He could make us acceptable in His presence. We claim that the blood shed by Jesus Christ on that terrible, old, wooden cross was God's own blood, and that it made the divine and complete atonement for the sins of all the world. But our seemingly outlandish claims do not stop at the cross. We claim still further that this same Jesus Christ was removed dead from that cross and then buried, only to raise Himself from that grave three days and three nights later. Then we claim that this supposed "dead" man walked this earth for an additional forty days. This visit was climaxed, we say, when He, in plain view of His disciples, rose bodily into Heaven to be seated at the right hand of God.&lt;br /&gt;We bold sounding Christians don't stop there, for on top of all this, we claim that Jesus Christ has not left this world without a hope. We say that He is calling out a people to Himself in this generation. We claim that through faith in His atonement, by simply "calling upon the name of the Lord," we shall be saved. Not to be stopped yet, we go on to say that we can predict future world events including what we call the rapture of the believers. Still later we say that this same Jesus Christ will return bodily to Jerusalem to set up His kingdom and reign one thousand years.&lt;br /&gt;The Questioner&lt;br /&gt;"Wild claims! Outrageous! Unfounded superstitions!" shout our critics. Our critics are quick to attempt to disqualify our claims -- to disprove them -- for these claims are completely contrary to the humanistic philosophy through which mankind is attempting to "bring in the kingdom." Our critics continue, "If the claims of these peculiar people -- these Christians -- are correct, then there is no excuse for not accepting them and repudiating the misguided philosophies of all the humanists, the politicians, and the socio-religious community. They can't be right! There is too much to lose." So they seek to discredit our claims.&lt;br /&gt;We Have Proof!&lt;br /&gt;Wild claims? Seemingly. Outrageous? No more than some of the theories put forth by scientific "freethinkers" of our day. Unfounded superstitions? Never! And this is where the battle has raged for centuries and will continue to rage. If all we had to back up our claims was our multiplied words expressing nothing more than our opinions, then we are no better than our "scientific" adversaries. No, these are not vain words or trumped up theories. We have a Book! Oh, what a Book! Every claim that we make is contained in it. We open it and let the arguments of our critics do battle against it with spears made of rubber on horses with feeble legs. They are repulsed; defeated; humiliated. They regroup and send in artillery, mortars, and missiles only to find that the Word of God is better fortified than a concrete bunker. Then suddenly it cuts them to ribbons, and they retreat wounded, grumbling, and fear-bound. What was it about this Book that so aptly handled them and remains unharmed? Its words! For this is not a novel. This is not a fiction thriller. This is not a "science" book which must be rewritten every few years to "keep up with the changing times." No, this is God's Book, the Bible. This is God's Book, filled with God's words. Immortal, indestructible, infallible, immovable and unchanging. What a marvelous Book! What power! What an awful enemy to the silly theories of mankind.&lt;br /&gt;The Bible. It stands tall, towering high above its enemies. And it is ours!&lt;br /&gt;My Conversion&lt;br /&gt;I shall never forget the day I trusted Jesus Christ as my own personal Saviour. I was twenty years of age. I was wild, rebellious and unhappy. I was lost and on my way to Hell. I knelt at an altar where a great man of God took the Bible and leafed through it, showing me the truths of salvation. Just before he led me in prayer, he, in his wisdom, played a trick on me, a trick that God used to set the course for my life. He looked over at me and asked, "Do you believe that Jesus Christ paid for all your sins?"&lt;br /&gt;I replied, "Yes."&lt;br /&gt;"Do you believe that He will save you if you ask Him to?" "Yes."&lt;br /&gt;Then the trick! "How do you know it?"&lt;br /&gt;"Because you told me!" I replied somewhat impatiently and a little put out. I had come to get saved, and I felt like I was getting the run around. I saw no need at all for that last question.&lt;br /&gt;"NO"&lt;br /&gt;What! No? What was going on here? I had come to get saved, and now I was being made to look like a fool. I had been intentionally set up just so that I would give the wrong answer! I was angry! I was embarrassed! If his telling me how to be saved wasn't how I knew it, then how was I supposed to know? I looked him dead in the eye and blurted out my response almost demandingly, "Then, why?"&lt;br /&gt;His next action took me completely off guard, but it plainly answered my question. He held that open Bible up in front of me with one hand, tapped its open pages, and said with grave finality, "Because this Book says so!"&lt;br /&gt;I was shocked! I remember looking at that precious open Bible, and while trying to fathom this great truth that had just been expounded before me, I said to myself, "You mean that Book has that much power?" I knew the answer was yes. Then I humbly bowed my head and my heart and put my faith and trust in Jesus Christ, accepting His payment as my own. But I have never forgotten the lesson taught to me so powerfully on the day of my salvation.&lt;br /&gt;The Bible. What a powerful Book! It needs no man's approval to assert its authority. The Bible. The Book that no man can conquer. The Bible. That faithful message from God. Never changing; never weakening. Standing defiantly as perfect, as authoritative, in a world that claims nothing can be perfect and that rebels at the thought of any authority, especially that of a book. The Bible. It is God's Book.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chapter 3:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Ground Rules&lt;br /&gt;Anyone who has ever played a game, been involved in any kind of competition, or conducted any type of scientific investigation knows that "ground rules" must be established at the beginning. It is far better to know the rules before beginning the investigation rather than to try to establish them as you go.&lt;br /&gt;If we are going to make a study of the preservation of the Word of God, the rules we shall follow must be established now. The rules we establish now will have a direct effect on the conclusion reached at the end of our investigation. We must be cautious as we seek to found these rules. We must free ourselves from prejudice. We must establish rules which, firstly, will not contradict each other and, secondly, rules that can and will be applied fairly to all evidence examined.&lt;br /&gt;As in any issue with two sides, the conclusion can not please all. Those to whom the conclusion is favorable will commend the investigation for its fairness, while those to whom the conclusion is unfavorable will obviously seek to discredit the method used in arriving at such a conclusion. With this in mind, the most important portion of our investigation will not be what evidence we examine, but the rules by which we interpret that evidence.&lt;br /&gt;Much of the material to be examined is not new but holds huge amounts of truth which have been locked up and unusable due to the previously unfair method by which its testimony was evaluated. To insure that this testimony will be thoroughly heard in an unprejudiced court room, this writer seeks to establish plain, unprejudiced, and spiritually sound rules by which to judge the witnesses. The voices of some learned men will no doubt be heard to protest, while the voices of others, equally as learned, will be heard to agree. The writer will not appeal to either of these voices for approval but will seek to establish rules which even those who disagree with the conclusion must admit are fair. These rules will judge all the evidence fairly and completely so as to wring every bit of worthwhile testimony from them. We must deal in facts and deal with the facts fairly. As one scholar so aptly put it, "My leading principle is to build solely upon facts -- upon real, not fanciful facts -- not upon a few favorite facts, but upon all that are connected with the question under consideration."&lt;br /&gt;First and above all in importance, it must be remembered that the Bible is a spiritual book. If we divorce this fact from our minds, it will be impossible to arrive at a valid conclusion. Let me explain.&lt;br /&gt;First, God had His hand in its inception. The passage that so quickly comes to the mind of all fundamentalists is II Peter 1:19-21:&lt;br /&gt;19 "We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts:&lt;br /&gt;20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.&lt;br /&gt;21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Note that Peter is stating that the written Word is more sure than God speaking from heaven, a voice which Peter himself heard (vs. 17, 18).&lt;br /&gt;There are many "side-show evangelists" that would have us believe that God "spoke to me last night." Peter says that God's verbal commands and precepts are not as sure as His written words. Verbal statements are not binding. They cannot be proven. But written words are not so fluid. When God chose to put His words down in writing, He made an irreversible decision. We can now hold Him to His words. Once those words have been written, they are irrevocable. A God who would bind Himself to us so inescapably must love us and truly desire for us to have His words and to be sure of them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Peter also states that the writers of Scripture did not write under their own power, but "holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why Inspire a Book?&lt;br /&gt;God wants us to see that He had His hand in it from the beginning. The words of those original autographs were not the thoughts of God, but His very words, which brings to mind a question. Why did God inspire His word perfectly? Obviously the answer comes back, "So that man could have every word of God, pure, complete, trustworthy, and without error." Amen! That statement touches the heart of any fundamental, Bible-believing Christian. And yet, what if God gave those precious words only to those early writers, then lost them in history, diluted them with heretical teachings, and then locked them up in prison where few could visit them and none could trust them? What if these words and manuscripts, which have long passed off the scene, were the only perfect words God ever gave us? What if it was impossible for us ever to obtain those words for ourselves, in this present generation? Why did God inspire them? Why write a perfect Book and then lose it? Why provide those closest to Christ with a perfect Book but us, 2,000 years later, with a book that is only a shadow of truth at best? A book filled with mistakes, spurious passages, and doubtful readings! This is inconsistent with God's nature.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The question is: Could God, who overcame time (about 1,700 years transpired from the writing of the oldest Old Testament book to the closing of the New Testament in 90 A.D.1) and man's human nature to write the Bible perfectly in the first place, do the same thing to preserve it?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Let us look to see what the authority says about such a thing happening.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Psalm 12:6, 7 "The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Note verse seven! "THOU shalt keep them O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bible, God's Word, says that God will preserve His words. Verse six mentions the "words of the LORD" and the "them" of verse seven is referring to those "words." No, apparently the all-powerful God of creation will not preserve His "thoughts" or "ideas," but He will preserve His very words!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is He capable of that?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jeremiah 32:17, 27 "Ah Lord GOD, behold thou has made the heaven and the earth by thy great power and stretched out arm, and there is nothing too hard for thee:... Behold, I am the LORD, the God of all flesh: is there any thing too hard for me?"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is a miracle too hard for the God of miracles? Was the creation too hard for God? Was the flood too hard for God? Was the parting of the Red Sea too hard for God? Was the 40 years of manna too hard for God? Was the virgin birth of Christ too hard for God? Was the collection of the 66 books of the Bible written over a period of 1,700 years too hard for God? Was overcoming the human nature of the sinful writers too hard for God? Is preserving the words of those writers too hard for God?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think that inspiration would be far harder to believe than preservation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why is it that men of faith sound out their convictions so loudly on the above mentioned doctrines (and others) in which their faith cannot be pressed to the limit, but they suddenly shrink from the thought that God, who could write His Book perfectly, could preserve it? Why is it so easy to believe that God's great miracles are all in the past, but He cannot work one now? Where are those "words" that Peter spoke in II Peter 1:19-21? Where are those "words" which David spoke of in Psalm 12:6, 7? Where are those "words" which Jesus Christ Himself spoke of in Matthew 24:35 when He said, "Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Have those precious and perfect words from the pens of Moses, David, Isaiah, Daniel, Matthew, Peter, Paul, Luke, John and others been cast into oblivion? Have they fallen to the ground to be trampled under foot of men, only to be replaced by something not as pure, not as perfect, not as reliable, which we 'Bible-believers' are forced to pretend is the Word and the words of God when we are in the pulpit, but in the quietness of our studies or in our private conversations we let our infidelity and fear show as we check off "mistake" after "mistake?"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;God's Mistake?&lt;br /&gt;Is this God's method? I trow not. For if God wrote the Bible perfectly in the "originals," but we cannot have those same words in a volume of that Book today, then it would seem that He wasted His time inspiring it perfectly in the first place. We who are so far removed from the New Testament times need His every perfect word far more than Matthew, Luke, John, or Peter or the others who saw Jesus Christ in the flesh! They had their memories. They had His touch still on their brow. They had His words still ringing in their ears. All we have is the Book. All we have is the words bound between those black covers. It is essential that they be His every word, for they are all we have!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So well has Wilbur Pickering put it when he said:&lt;br /&gt;"If the scriptures have not been preserved then the doctrine of Inspiration is a purely academic matter with no relevance for us today. If we do not have the inspired words or do not know precisely which they be, then the doctrine of Inspiration is inapplicable." 2&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yes, if God has not preserved His words as He said that He would (Psalm 12:6, 7), then He has done something which He has never done before. He has wasted His time! The inspiration of the original manuscripts was in vain if we do not have those very same words in English today.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So then we see that it is important to any seeker of truth to always keep in mind that the Bible is different from all other books, in that God had His hand in it. It is a spiritual book. Anyone undertaking a study of the evidence of the New Testament, or any other portion of Scripture, who does not take this into consideration cannot possibly arrive at the correct conclusion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rule #1&lt;br /&gt;Ground rule number one is: It is always to be remembered that the Bible is a spiritual book which God exerted supernatural force to conceive, and it is reasonable to assume that He could exert that same supernatural force to preserve.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Great Counterfeiter&lt;br /&gt;This brings us to our next logical step. If God was active in the conception and preservation of the Bible, then the supreme negative force in nature must be active against it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This Book has an adversary. Satan is against it!&lt;br /&gt;The Bible is a tangible item. Like most books, it is printed on paper with ink. As mentioned above, however, it must be remembered that it is a spiritual book in which God has had a positive and an active part. It must also be remembered that there exists in the world a supreme negative power, Satan.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One general truth that we all know concerning Satan is that he at one time had a position in Heaven. Iniquity was found in him, and he was cast out. What was his offense? He wanted to be worshipped as God! Remember that. The Bible records in Isaiah 14:13, 14, "For thou hath said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He wanted to be worshipped as God! Satan has not changed his goals. He still desires to be worshipped as God. To be worshipped as God, he must imitate God. Satan is the great counterfeiter. From beginning to end, the Bible records Satan's constant efforts to imitate and replace God. In Genesis chapter three, we find Satan implying that he knows more than God, and from this point, he influences mankind into obeying him. When Moses displays the miracles of God through the plagues of Egypt, Satan's magicians counterfeit as many plagues as they possibly can.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Monasteries, mosques and huge cathedrals cover the globe as a testimony to his religious fervor and as clear evidence of his ability to extract worship from his followers. Call him Lucifer, Baal, Ashteroth, Mary or any other name, but allow him the liberty, and he will take a portion of truth and twist it in such a deceitfully convincing way that if possible he could "deceive the very elect" (Matthew 24:24).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Matthew chapter four, we find Satan's last desperate plea to Jesus Christ was that He "fall down and worship me."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Satan is the great counterfeiter. For every genuine manifestation of God, Satan produces hundreds of carbon copies. Look at the record:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One God - many "gods" One Christ - many "christs" One Gospel - many "ways to heaven" One following, Christianity - many religions, denominations, cults One Bible - ?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Whenever God manifests His power through some positive action resulting in a miracle, Satan manifests his power in a counterfeit, but deceiving, way in an attempt to "steal" God's deserved reverence.&lt;br /&gt;Note in Revelation chapter 13 how many times the word "worship" occurs in reference to Satan in the form of the Anti-Christ. Notice also that this worship comes as a direct result of Satanic, counterfeit miracles which are all imitations of similar true miracles performed by God, by His prophets, or by Jesus Christ, which resulted in God being worshipped.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;God's Warning&lt;br /&gt;God knew of Satan's "standard operating procedure" and tried to warn Israel of his ability to counterfeit God's miracles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Deuteronomy 13:1-3 "If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder, And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou has not known, and let us serve them; Thou shalt not harken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the Lord your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Notice that God is aware of the false miracles and is awaiting the outcome. To resist Satan's false miracles is to turn your heart toward God. This is what happened with Job. This is what would have happened with Eve if she had rejected his counsel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Satan's Desires&lt;br /&gt;Satan wants to be worshipped. This is Satan's motive. Let us look briefly at a scriptural record of the method he used in dealing with his arch-enemy, Jesus Christ.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Satan makes a direct approach to achieve his goal. Matthew 4.&lt;br /&gt;2. He produces many "christs" to God's one Christ. Matthew 24:23, 24. (Christ had many witnesses. Even after death there were over 500 witnesses at His resurrection appearance. I Cor. 15:16).&lt;br /&gt;3. Satan can produce only two false witnesses to refute the testimony of many, and their witness does not agree. Matthew 26:60, Mark 14:50.&lt;br /&gt;4. He produces a lie attempting to prove that the original Christ has been lost and is nowhere to be found. This leaves the field open for his anti-christs. Matthew 28:13, 14.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now remember, Satan desires to be worshipped as God. Remember he is "the great counterfeiter."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;God's Three Gifts&lt;br /&gt;Now look at the three most important things God has given to the world:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Jesus Christ - through Jesus Christ, God's plan of salvation has been wrought, and God has displayed to the world the coming King. Jesus Christ is now in heaven.&lt;br /&gt;2. Christianity - The born again believers regenerated by the power of God, upon their accepting Christ's payment for their sins. The Christians reside on earth, physically separated from their Saviour.&lt;br /&gt;3. Bible - The crowning work of the Holy Spirit. It is the lifeline of the earthbound Christians to the Heaven-seated Saviour.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If heaven were real, and it is; if Jesus Christ died for our sins, and He did; if salvation were free, and it is; if Jesus Christ is coming back to get His church, and He is; if He will someday rule on a throne in Jerusalem, and He will; but if we have no Bible to tell us these things, we would not know them! Truth does no good if we do not know about that truth! The Bible is God's medium through which He tells us all that we know about Him.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If Satan can eliminate the Bible, he can break our lifeline to Heaven. If he can only get us to doubt its accuracy, he can successfully foil God's every attempt to teach us. The Holy Spirit will lead us into all truth, but every truth He leads us to will be in the Bible. If Satan is going to be consistent with his nature, he must attack the Bible, the Word of God.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rule #2&lt;br /&gt;Our second rule to keep in mind, then, is: Satan desires to be worshipped. He has the ability to counterfeit God's actions and definitely will be involved actively in attempting to destroy God's Word and/or our confidence in that Word, while seeking to replace it with his own "version."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Rules Reviewed&lt;br /&gt;The two rules which we must keep in mind at all times are:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. It is always to be remembered that the Bible is a spiritual book which God exerted supernatural force to conceive; and it is reasonable to assume that He could exert that same supernatural force to preserve.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. Satan desires to be worshipped. He has the ability to counterfeit God's actions, and definitely will be involved actively in attempting to destroy God's Word and/or our confidence in that Word, while seeking to replace it with his own "version."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chapter 4:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The 100 Year War&lt;br /&gt;For approximately one hundred years now, a battle has been raging over the question, "Where is the Word of God?"&lt;br /&gt;Surely we Christians cannot expect a Christ-rejecting world to accept our Book as its authority. We can, of course, expect rebellion. We can expect the world to make attempts to discredit the Bible's reliability. The battle of the lost theologians against the Bible has been waged since the Garden of Eden.&lt;br /&gt;But the war that I am referring to is not the war between the lost world and born again Christians. For the last one hundred years the same kind of war has been raging within Christian ranks! Up until the late 1800's there was, generally speaking, only one Bible, the Authorized Version. There had been others, but the translation instituted by King James I in 1603 A.D. and published in 1611 A.D. had become known not just in England, but throughout the entire world as the "Authorized" Version. It is a historical fact that the King James Bible had become known as the "Authorized" Version due to its universal acceptance among Christians of the world, and not due to a proclamation from King James himself.&lt;br /&gt;Hills states: "Although it is often called the 'Authorized Version,' it actually was never authorized by any official action on the part of the Church or State. On the contrary, it's [sic] universal reception by the common people of all denominations seems clearly to be another instance of the providence of God working through the God-guided usage of the Church."3&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ruckman points out: "As anyone knows, the A.V. 1611 had no royal backing, no royal promoting, no act of Parliament behind it, and the University Press was allowed to print any other version of the Bible along with it." 4&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;McClure states concerning the King James Bible: "Its origin and history so strongly commended it, that it speedily came into general use as the standard version, by the common consent of the English people; and required no act of parliament nor royal proclamation to establish it's [sic] authority."5&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As well, the footnote from the above reference in McClure's book reads as follows:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Says Dr. Lee, Principal of the University of Edinburgh: "I do not find that there was any canon, proclamation, or act of parliament, to enforce the use of it. 'The present version' says Dr. Symonds, as quoted in Anderson's Annuals, 'appears to have made its way, without the interposition of any authority whatsoever; for it is not easy to discover any traces of a proclamation, canon or statute published to enforce the use of it.' It has been lately ascertained that neither the King's private purse, nor the public exchequer, contributed a farthing toward the expense of the translation or publication of the work."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then in the mid to late 1800's a theory was initiated by two scholars of the names Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort. This is the theory that the Traditional Text was a "conflate" text produced by editors and not merely by scribes. Their theory has remained over the years, as Darwin's theory of evolution has remained, just a theory. It has never been proven and has in fact lost support over the years. Fuller confirms this when he records Martin's statement that "the trend of scholars in more recent years has been away from the original Westcott-Hort position."6&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Their theory will be looked at in depth in a later chapter of this book.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Revolution&lt;br /&gt;By 1870 England was ripe for Westcott's and Hort's radical ideas, and their Greek Text was used by the Revision Committee of 1871 and by every revision and version ever since.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The battle began! Which text is closest to the "originals?" And, of course, the ultimate question: "Do we have a perfect Bible in English today?"&lt;br /&gt;Today, three-quarters of the way through the Twentieth Century, Christianity is still divided over the question, "Do we have a perfect Bible in English today?" This battle will probably continue for the remainder of this century and well on into the next, if the Lord tarries His coming.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do we have a perfect Bible in English today? This is not an amazing question at all. In fact, it is quite a natural question that comes to every Christian at one time or another. Surely a naive babe in Christ would never approach an unbelieving scholar with this question and then lay the Bible in his hands so that he may do with it as he pleases. Surely he would not lay God's book at man's mercy. If he would, he should not be surprised when the scholar's answer, flowing in terms not easily understood, comes back, "No."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Unbelieving scholarship is its own authority. It does not need any competition from a book!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Unregenerate man goes about believing a theory that man has evolved and was not created. Yet when this theory is examined scientifically and logically, it cannot be proven to be true. Does this upset the unbeliever? No. He just sets about to believe his theory, for he knows that believing it allows him to be his own final authority. He also knows that to reject the theory of evolution means he must accept creationism as true, and this he has avowed in his heart not to do. He does not want to be associated with a few fanatics!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why is it that this type of reaction is found when dealing with Christian scholarship concerning the Bible? Ask a Christian scholar to tell you where the Word of God is, and he will tell you, "in the Bible." Yet, hand him any English Bible, and he will reply, "It's not there." How can we as fundamental Bible-believers tell people from our pulpits that the Bible is "infallible, without error, the very words of God" and then step out of the pulpit and allege to be able to find a mistake in it? This would not seem so serious if "the infallible Word of God" was not one of the doctrines that separates us from the world. We take pride in thundering forth that we are not as the unregenerate world, without an absolute guideline. We have a guideline. We have the guideline, the Word of God! Then we hold our open Bible up for all to see and shout, "This is God's Word! It's perfect, infallible, inerrant, the very words of God!" Yet in our hearts we are saying, "I believe all this about the original; this is just a mistake-filled translation."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most fundamentalists today vehemently reject the thought that God has preserved His words in English. We have "the Bible" they say, but it isn't in any one English version. Most fundamentalists never truly realize the weight of their statements when they say that we have no perfect English Bible. Anyone who has studied even a little about Greek manuscripts knows that the Word of God isn't found in any of the Greek texts when translated literally.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What has started this controversy? From whence has this division of the brethren come?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Problem?&lt;br /&gt;The first answer that comes to the mind of some Christians is that this division has been caused by a small group of fanatics who think that only the King James Bible is the Word of God, and who refuse to face the facts that the oldest and best manuscripts support the new translations flooding Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Strangely enough, history points to just the opposite being true. The text used by the Authorized Version has been used from the time of the early church until today by true Christians. It is supported not only by the vast majority of manuscripts existent today but also by those of the highest quality and oldest reading. It has been used throughout history with the blessing of God among His born again believers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Problem!&lt;br /&gt;It is only a recent occurrence that Biblical Christianity has begun to use the inferior Roman Catholic manuscripts and asserted that they are better. This is the mistake garnered by the errant "scholarship" of Wescott and Hort. These people are the new young sect of Christianity who will not accept the oldest and best. Usually unsuspectingly, they put their support to manuscripts which are decidedly Roman Catholic in doctrine and history. It is we who are sure we hold the true words of God brought down through the centuries by the blood of our martyred Christian brethren.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ironically, those that take up the "new" versions, with their "better" Greek text, are voluntarily taking up the Bible which their early Christian brethren refused to use, a refusal that brought the Roman Catholic Church, the historic enemy of the Truth, crashing down on them. That same Roman Catholic Church is still active against the Truth today, only now many Christians are using her Bible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I know that these are strong statements. I intend throughout this work to prove their truth, but I state now, that I do not intend to bring railing accusations on those brethren who do not agree with me. I will state that they are wrong, prove that they are wrong, and attempt to point out their position in regard to God's revealed Word. I do not intend however, to forget that they are my brethren (those who have trusted Jesus Christ as their own personal Saviour) and will treat them as beloved.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Shot Heard 'Round the World&lt;br /&gt;This one hundred year war of words started back when the supporters of the Oxford Movement (apostates) realized that they must discredit the Reformers and Fundamental theologians in order to support their Roman Catholic Greek Text in place of the Received Text. Their salvo was returned by men like Burgon, Wilson, Scribener, Mauro, Hoskier, Cook, Salmon, Beckett, Malan and Wilkenson, and continues today with many of our modern day scholars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Blind Rage!&lt;br /&gt;On both sides of the issue, men are called fanatic, heretic, cultist, Bible-rejecter, demon-possessed and more. These two sides have fought until the facts about which they fight are obscured by the dust of the battle. They call each other names until the student of Scripture finds reputable men on both sides of the controversy damaging their potential influence by using some adjectives which, indeed, are very descriptive but totally unnecessary. I am not a soft city gentleman who thinks we should all sit around and talk in quiet tones while sipping tea and eating "brunch." I am a militant Bible-believer who hates the devil, sin, heresy, and apostasy. Yet, I think it is time that we who claim to be "fundamentalists" step back and look to see who our enemy really is!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The True Enemy&lt;br /&gt;The subtle Roman Catholic Church has assumed the position of the lad who told two of his enemies, "You and he fight ... I'll hold the coats!" After all, is not "divide and conquer" one of the oldest military strategies known to men? The fundamentalists have laid their coats at the feet of "Holy Mother Church" and for the past 100 years proceeded to "knock each others' block off." Is it any wonder that the Pope smiles so much? Who is our enemy? Let's find him and fight him. Today it seems, on both sides, that we are concerned more with finding fault with the people that we disagree with rather than what they teach. Let me make this statement: If what I believe about the King James Bible can be disproved, I will gladly trade it in for the "right" Bible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We have an enemy, and I believe we should be verbal and active against that enemy, but I feel it is time that we realize that our enemy is not our brother. It is the one holding his coat!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The part of the Roman Catholic Church in the affair is similar to that of a soldier leaping into the foxhole of the enemy, only to find that all of the enemy soldiers have strangled each other!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Occasionally on either side we will be forced to face a railer, but instead of "writing him off" we will have to be charitable and look past his railing to see what his facts say. If we can disprove his facts, we need not worry about his mouth!&lt;br /&gt;"Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" Galatians 4:16.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Test&lt;br /&gt;What we must do as men of understanding is look into these statements and the questions which they naturally provoke.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost." II Peter 1:21.&lt;br /&gt;Did God inspire His Word perfectly in the original autographs?&lt;br /&gt;"The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thou shalt keep them O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever." Psalms 12:6, 7.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Has God preserved His words?&lt;br /&gt;"Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away." Matthew 24:35.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do we have Christ's words, or have they "passed away?"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The first verse, II Peter 1:21, guarantees that God was active in originating His Word in the first place. "Inspired" we call it. Inspired perfectly, without any error. God was the all-powerful agent in seeing to it that sinful man wrote down His Word flawlessly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The second verse, Psalms 12:6, 7, claims that God is not only the agent in writing His words (verse 6) but is also the primary agent in preserving His words. Note that the subject is God's words, not His "thoughts."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the third verse, Matthew 24:35, Jesus Christ, God in the flesh reinforces what Psalm 12:7 has already said. Christ said that His words would not pass away before heaven or earth. Heaven is still above us, and I am relatively sure that the earth is still beneath our feet, so the words of God must be here, within our grasp. Somewhere. If His words are only in Greek, then he has restricted their usage to an elite number of scholars. This, however, was never Jesus Christ's method when He was on this earth. He always went past the religious, scholarly minority and took His words to the common people. Until then, only the Pharisees had possessed God's words in the form of the completed, accepted Old Testament books, and although they were well educated and very religious, they were found to be taking advantage of the common people. Christ eliminated this problem by going directly to the common people of His day.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Gospel is to all. God gave His Word to every person and gave the Holy Spirit as a guide to all truth (John 16:13) in spite of the Roman Catholic teachings that only the "clergy" are allowed to interpret the Scripture.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If God's words are locked up in the "Greek Text," then once again education is a prerequisite to having the Word of God and knowing what it says. This type of philosophy would have eliminated Peter and John from the ministry, for they were "unlearned and ignorant men." They were unlearned, and the Bible states that they were ignorant as though incapable of learning. Yet, "they had been with Jesus"! (Acts 4:12, 13). Jesus Christ made the difference, giving Peter a great understanding of Scripture! Notice his delivery in Acts 1:15-22, 2:14-36, 4:8-12. He understood, though unlearned and ignorant. Education, though beneficial, is not a necessity for being used of God. I am not anti-education or anti-college, but the first requirements are that a person has "been with Jesus" (Acts 4:13) and that they realize and believe that the written Word which they have in hand is "more sure" than God's spoken Word.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now today we know that it is easy to "be with Jesus." The Bible says in Romans 10:9, "That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved." In John 14:20 it says, "At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But what about the second half? What about a written Word that we can believe is "more sure" than God speaking from heaven? A Word which the Bible claims God has exalted above all of His name? (Psalms 138:2). Can we have God's words today in our common language?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Common Language&lt;br /&gt;While on the subject of a common language, let me point out that many opponents of the infallibility of the Authorized Version say that if God put a perfect Bible in English, He is also obligated to furnish such a translation in every other language. There must be a perfect Bible in German, French, Japanese and all of the other languages of the world. Unfortunately for them, this argument will not stand. There were many languages on this earth at the time that God chose to put it in Hebrew. There were hundreds of languages on this earth also, when God chose Greek for his New Testament. Matthew 13:18, Acts 13:46, 28:28, and Romans 11:11 show that God this time was going to be taking His message to the Gentiles, so He furnished it in the common language of the day -- Greek.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Question: When would the two Testaments be combined into one perfect Book?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Answer: As soon as God chose a language to become common to the entire world. Germany, Spain, France and most of Europe were soon to be overly influenced by Rome. No language there. There have been great Latin and Syrian translations, but these languages never became common to the entire world. God needed an island of purity, a nation not shackled by Romanism, and a language so descriptive and simple that it could best deliver His message. These needs were satisfied in England. Here was a people who threw off the bondage of Rome and a young language which was to creep into every corner of the world, from the Arctic to the Antarctic, and from England and America to Moscow and Peking. English is the language of this world!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;English is taught to Russian pilots, because it is universal. It is learned by Oriental businessmen, because it is universal. It was the first language spoken on the moon! English is spoken the world over. This is the language God would use. Being a God of purity, He would want to use it in its purest form. The English of the King James Bible has been known to be the finest form of the language ever used. McClure praises the Authorized Version in this manner:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The English language has passed through many and great changes, and had at last reached the very height of its purity and strength. The Bible has ever since been the great English classic. It is still the noblest monument of the power of the English speech. It is singularly free from what used to be called 'ink-horn terms' that is, such words as are more used in writing than in speaking, and are not well understood except by scholars."7&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The English language was, in the 17th Century, just solidifying. It had been a fluid language, made up of elements of Danish, Old Norse, Latin, Greek, French, and many other dialects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In about 1500, major changes in vocal pronunciation, inflection, and spelling simplified and helped solidify the language.8 This was all in preparation for the ultimate English work, the Authorized Version of 1611.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many claim today that since the Authorized Version was printed in the common English of that day, that the Bible should be retranslated into the common English of today, but this is not a valid claim. It must be remembered that the English used in the Authorized Version was not only the common language, but it was also the English language in its purest form. The English language has degenerated from what it was in 1611 to what it is today. Those claiming to put the Bible in "modern English" are actually, though possibly not intentionally, trying to force the pure words of God into the degenerated vocabulary of today! What a disgrace to God's Word! What a shame to those who propose such a thing!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Archaic Con Job&lt;br /&gt;A charge often brought against the Authorized Version is that it is full of "archaic" words. But are we to make the Bible pay the penalty of our own irresponsibility in not keeping our language pure and descriptive? Would we not be richer to learn the meaning of those nasty, old, "archaic" words and add them back into our own vocabulary? Would we not be making the Bible poorer by depriving it of its descriptive style? Are these words truly "archaic?" I have seen stores today that still advertise "sundry" items. Perhaps the store owner didn't realize that it was supposed to be archaic. Perhaps it is like the fish caught off the Atlantic Coast a few years ago which was supposed to have been extinct for over one million years. Of course it was extinct! It just didn't know it! Science said it was extinct, so it must be. (They first had better prove that the world was here one million years ago.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Let us look at the word "conversation" in Philippians 1:27 and see how God chose the most descriptive words He could. Is not "conversation" a much more descriptive term than "life?" When we realize that our life speaks to people then we must live our Christianity, not talk it. The Authorized Version obviously gives us a deeper meaning.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What about words whose usage has definitely been dropped from modern English? Those words which are just not used anymore? What shall we do with them? In answer to this question, let us remember that the Bible is The Word of God. We "Bible people" claim to accept its authority in all matters of faith and practice. But do we? Do we accept the Biblical practice of how to deal with situations today? Would we be willing to accept the Biblical example of how to deal with words whose meanings have changed?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Let us look and learn and follow the Bible example of handling "archaic" words. Surely the Bible, God's Word, cannot be wrong! Let us look at I Samuel chapter 9.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. "Now there was a man of Benjamin, whose name was Kish, the son of Abiel, the son of Zeror, the son of Bechorath, the son of Aphiah, a Benjamite, a mighty man of power.2. And he had a son, whose name was Saul, a choice young man, and a goodly: and there was not among the children of Israel a goodlier person than he: from his shoulders and upward he was higher than any of the people.&lt;br /&gt;3. And the asses of Kish Saul's father were lost. And Kish said to Saul his son, Take now one of the servants with thee, and arise, go seek the asses." (I Sam. 9:1-3)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These verses give us the circumstances involved. After searching fruitlessly for his father's asses, Saul decided to give up, fearing that his father, Kish, may begin to worry about Saul and his servant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6. "And he said unto him, Behold now, there is in this city a man of God, and he is an honourable man; all that he saith cometh surely to pass: now let us go thither, peradventure he can shew us our way that we should go.&lt;br /&gt;7. Then said Saul to his servant, But, behold, if we go, what shall we bring the man? for the bread is spent in our vessels, and there is not a present to bring to the man of God: what have we?8. And the servant answered Saul again, and said, Behold, I have here at hand the fourth part of a shekel of silver: that will I give to the man of God, to tell us our way.' (I Sam. 9:6-8)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now let us watch very carefully, for an "archaic" word is about to make its appearance in the next verse. But before it can, God inserts a note to the reader!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;9. "(Beforetime in Israel, when a man went to enquire of God, thus he spake, Come and let us go to the seer: for he that is now called a Prophet was beforetime called a Seer.)" (I Sam. 9:9)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;God knows that the word "seer" is no longer in common usage; it is archaic. He defines it so that we will better understand His choice of words. Is this changing the text? No! Look at the following two verses.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Then said Saul to his servant, Well said; come, let us go. So they went unto the city where the man of God was.11. And as they went up the hill to the city, they found young maidens going out to draw water, and said unto them, Is the seer here?" (I Sam. 9:10-11)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Notice in verse 11 God leaves the "archaic" word in the text! He does not change it to "prophet." He does not change the text. God gives us a definition of the word which He chose to use in the text, but He does not give us a "modern" or "updated" edition. This is the Biblical example of how God handles an "archaic" word without rewriting the text.&lt;br /&gt;God's Method&lt;br /&gt;"We fundamentalists accept the authority of the Bible in all matters of faith and practice." I suggest we practice this method. Define what a word, whose definition has become cloudy through the changes in the English language, really means. I am not advising "running to the Greek." I am advising "running to the dictionary" and letting the text stand as it reads without the derogatory remarks about "archaic" words and "out of date usage." Let us respect God's text more than that.&lt;br /&gt;God has given us every word; we do well to accept them from Him as they are and not attempt to "improve" on them. As one great preacher said, "The Bible doesn't need to be re-written, it needs to be reread." I concur. Born again Christians are intended to be "Bible people." Are we not expected to read the Book we claim so loudly to believe?&lt;br /&gt;Upon receiving a lengthy letter from home, does a lonely soldier proceed to the third page to begin his reading? After page 3 does he "speed read" page 4, skip page 5, and read half of page 6? Does he attempt to understand the last page and then proceed to the first? Ridiculous isn't it? Yet it describes the Bible reading habits of many of God's people. Obviously, our soldier, so far away from the home he loves and the writer of his letter, is going to devour every word of this letter and upon finishing it, he will read it again -- every word.&lt;br /&gt;God sent us, His homesick soldiers, a "letter from home," yet we steadily refuse to read it. He didn't give us the whole Book just so that we could read the Psalms. We are expected to read Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy as well as John, Acts, and Romans. The same author who inspired I and II Corinthians placed every bit as much inspiration into I and II Chronicles. We are to read Malachi as well as Revelation. God has given us every word of the Bible. We are to start at the beginning and read every word! Upon reaching Revelation 22:21, we are not expected to quietly lay the Bible aside as if our work has been done. We are to begin afresh at Genesis 1:1. There are only two events that should stop a Christian from reading through his Bible continuously, cover to cover: death and the rapture. All other "reasons" are really weak excuses. We are to read the Book!&lt;br /&gt;Many exclaim, "But I can't understand it! There are portions with deep and difficult meanings." They find a difficult passage, give God approximately five minutes to deliver the answer, and then turn to a "better translation" or a Bible commentary for the answer. They are like the four-year-old child who wishes to drive a car. He sincerely wants to drive a car. His motive for wanting to drive may be pure. He believes that he can handle the job, and he wants the answer now. He will not only be refused permission to drive the car, but he as yet won't even be allowed on a bicycle. He cannot handle anything larger than a tricycle. As he matures, he will "graduate" to bigger and more complicated things.&lt;br /&gt;This is true with our English Bible. We begin to read through it for the first time and ask God a question, the answer of which we just cannot handle until our fourth or fifth or sixth time through. We sincerely want the answer. Our motive may be pure. We believe that we can handle the answer, and we want it now. God will not show us on our first time through the Bible what He has ready for us on our tenth or eleventh time through. We must grow, and there are no shortcuts. A shelf full of Bible commentaries and other translations is an attempt at a shortcut, but it will not work. I am not opposed to Bible commentaries. I am opposed to their de-emphasizing the Bible and replacing the Holy Spirit. I am in favor of intensifying our reading time in the only authority we have, the Authorized Version!&lt;br /&gt;But why the Authorized Version? Who says we have to use only this particular translation? Why couldn't some other version be perfect in English instead of the Authorized Version?&lt;br /&gt;To get the answers to these questions, we will have to take our hands off each other's throats long enough to examine the evidence which has come down to us through history. First, let's study where the manuscripts came from.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chapter 5:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Localities&lt;br /&gt;Family Feud&lt;br /&gt;The manuscripts and their classifications and readings will be studied in later pages. What we shall do now is closely scrutinize the primary centers from which our extant manuscripts have originated. It will be revealed in later study that Biblical manuscripts (MSS) are divided into two general groups. These two groups have been found to disagree with each other in many areas. Every English Bible in existence today will be found to proceed more or less from one of these two groups. The fact that there is one God plainly tells us that there can be only one correct reading concerning any given discrepancy between these two groups.&lt;br /&gt;Obviously, prior to comparing readings, it will be beneficial to investigate the ancient centers from which our two basic groups proceed.&lt;br /&gt;Earlier, we established two "ground rules." It will be relevant to our study to review those rules at this point, and to keep them in mind as we continue. Firstly, we established that the Bible is a spiritual book which God exerted supernatural force to conceive, and it is reasonable to assume that He could exert that same supernatural force to preserve it. Secondly, that Satan desires to be worshipped. He has the ability to counterfeit God's actions and definitely will be involved actively in attempting to destroy God's Word and/or our confidence in that Word, while seeking to replace it with his own "versions."&lt;br /&gt;The fact that the disagreement between these two families is centered around points of deity or doctrine tells us that one of them must be the preserved text, as found in the original MSS, while the other is a Satanic forgery. Satan attacked Jesus Christ (Matthew 4:1-11) and will try to replace Him in the future (Revelation 13:1-8).&lt;br /&gt;Are we to believe that Satan, a sworn enemy of Truth, is not going to attempt to disrupt the travel of God's Word through history? Would he dare let the only tangible item which God has left us remain unattacked? No, Satan cannot afford to allow the Holy Scriptures to be unmolested. He will obviously be heard to be its loudest textual critic and will attempt to eliminate God's true Word while replacing it with his own Satanic counterfeit.&lt;br /&gt;With this in mind, we shall begin with the original autographs and trace the history of these two families of MSS.&lt;br /&gt;The Beginning&lt;br /&gt;Jesus Christ always worked through His followers. It is only logical that He would look to His followers as instrumental in the preservation of His words.&lt;br /&gt;The New Testament was a paradox. It was completely foreign to anything that the world had ever known. Until the time of Christ, the world was Biblically divided into two groups.&lt;br /&gt;One was the Jews. They were known as God's "chosen people." Their religious practices were founded on the teachings of the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings (thirty-nine books which comprise our present Old Testament). They awaited their Messiah, the ruler who was expected at any time to come to earth and set up a Jewish kingdom based in Jerusalem.&lt;br /&gt;The other group spoken of in Scripture is the Gentile population of the world. The Gentiles are also referred to as a group by the term "Greeks." They were very religious, but heathenistic in practice. This is noted by the Apostle Paul. When in Athens he mentioned that the city was "wholly given to idolatry" (Acts 17:16). After seeing them carry out their religious duties, he concluded, "I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious" (Acts 17:22). The Gentile world was caught up in the fantasies of Christless education, philosophy, and religion.&lt;br /&gt;Another location of pagan religious practices was Rome. In Rome were found temples built for the worship of many pagan gods and goddesses. A few of these are Jupiter, Apollo, and Minerva.&lt;br /&gt;Still another pagan city known for its education and philosophy was Alexandria, Egypt. Famed for its library and school, it was a center of education during the centuries prior to the New Testament era. It was known to have received much of its philosophy from Athens about 100 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;When the Christian church appeared, made up of born again believers, it was looked upon as a rather strange group of people. The Jews rejected it because its patrons claimed that Jesus Christ was the Jewish Messiah. The Gentiles rejected Christianity because of the Christians' claims that salvation was complete and that one could know that they had eternal life. This ran contrary to the teachings of pagan philosophy that nothing can be known for sure. It also made their heathen religious practices worthless, not to mention all of their beautiful temples.&lt;br /&gt;The New Testament church needed a place to grow. It needed a location that was far away from the prejudices of the Jewish religious community centered in Jerusalem and the Gentile philosophical community. It needed a location that would be advantageous to the spreading of the gospel. Such a location was realized when, after the death of Stephen, the believers traveled to Phenice, Cyprus, and Antioch (Acts 11:19). But it was Antioch that the Holy Spirit chose for the base of Christian operations.&lt;br /&gt;Antioch was founded by Seleucus I about 300 B.C. Its location was of prime importance to the gospel since it was built at the crossroads of ancient trade routes from Mesopotamia to the Mediterranean and from western Arabia to Asia Minor. It also has a seaport on the Orontes River.&lt;br /&gt;In addition to the secular history of these two areas, let us examine what the Bible says concerning them.&lt;br /&gt;The law of first mention is important, as the first mention of a subject usually sets the light in which that subject shall reside in the Bible narrative.&lt;br /&gt;Egypt&lt;br /&gt;Since one of the two families of MSS originated in Alexandria, Egypt, we shall first look at Egypt. Egypt is first mentioned in Genesis 12:10. "...Abram went down into Egypt to sojourn there...." but verse 12 says, "Therefore it shall come to pass, when the Egyptians shall see thee, that they shall say, This is his wife: and they will kill me, but they will save thee alive." (Genesis 12:12). Immediately we find a negative air about Egypt in the Bible. Notice that Abram's fear concerns the line of Christ, Satan's first enemy.&lt;br /&gt;"And the Midianites sold him into Egypt unto Potiphar, an officer of Pharaoh's, and captain of the guard." (Genesis 37:36). Here we find Joseph sold into slavery in Egypt. This also is negative.&lt;br /&gt;"Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens. And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses." (Exodus 1:11). In this verse we see Israel, the people of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, persecuted in Egypt, a type of the world. Verses 15 and 16 show that Satan's attack was once again on the seed through which the Lord Jesus Christ would come. In Exodus 20:2, Egypt is called "the house of bondage." In Deuteronomy 4:20, God calls Egypt "the iron furnace."&lt;br /&gt;God forbids Israel to carry on commercial activities with Egypt in Deuteronomy 17:16. "But he shall not multiply horses to himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt, to the end that he should multiply horses: forasmuch as the LORD hath said unto you, Ye shall henceforth return no more that way." Notice this final sentence gives the solemn warning, "Ye shall henceforth return no more that way."&lt;br /&gt;In Jeremiah 46:25 we find God promising punishment on Egypt. "The LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, saith; Behold, I will punish the multitude of No, and Pharaoh, and Egypt, with their gods, and their kings; even Pharaoh, and all them that trust in him:"&lt;br /&gt;Look at Ezekiel 20:7. "Then said I unto them, Cast ye away every man the abominations of his eyes, and defile not yourselves with the idols of Egypt: I am the LORD your God." Here we find that God commanded Israel not to be associated with Egypt's idolatry.&lt;br /&gt;The last of our references compares Jerusalem in apostasy to Sodom and Egypt. "And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified." (Revelation 11:8).&lt;br /&gt;This is only a small cross section of the Biblical references to Egypt, but I believe we see that God's attitude towards Egypt is not positive.&lt;br /&gt;Now let's zero in on the city of Egypt which will concern our study, Alexandria.&lt;br /&gt;Alexandria&lt;br /&gt;Alexandria is first mentioned in Acts 6:9. "Then there arose certain of the synagogue, which is called the synagogue of the Libertines, and Cyrenians, and Alexandrians, and of them of Cilicia and of Asia, disputing with Stephen." Here we find that Jews from Alexandria were partially responsible for the stoning of Stephen.&lt;br /&gt;Also in Acts 18:24 we find Apollos was from Alexandria. Although he was later saved and became a great disciple of Christ, he was first associated with inadvertently misleading the people of Ephesus in Acts 19:1-3.&lt;br /&gt;We have now looked at what the Bible has to say concerning Egypt in general and Alexandria in particular.&lt;br /&gt;Since we accept the Bible in all matters of "faith and practice," we should take care to remember that God takes a negative approach to Egypt. Do we have any right to ignore God's displeasure and approach Egypt in a "positive" manner? Solomon was by far wiser than we are, yet he ignored God's clear warnings. For example, I Kings 3:1 says, "And Solomon made affinity with Pharoah king of Egypt, and took Pharoah's daughter, and brought her into the city of David, until he had made an end of building his own house, and the house of the LORD, and the wall of Jerusalem round about." Also, I Kings 10:28 says, "And Solomon had horses brought out of Egypt, and linen yarn: the king's merchants received the linen yarn at a price." (cf. Deuteronomy 17:16). We find that ignoring God's Word led to the heart being turned away from the Lord and after other gods (I Kings 11:3, 4). This resulted in abominable acts on his part (I Kings 11:5, 8)and finally brought God's judgment in I Kings 11:9-43.&lt;br /&gt;Certainly, if wise Solomon could fall by accepting Egypt in spite of God's clear condemnation, we would do well to take care before we buy any "horses out of Egypt." God may not be pleased with such actions.&lt;br /&gt;Antioch&lt;br /&gt;Now let us see what the Bible says about the city of Antioch.&lt;br /&gt;Antioch is first mentioned in Acts 6:5 when Nicolas, a Christian from Antioch, was chosen to be one of the first deacons. So we see that the first time Antioch is mentioned, it is in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;Antioch is mentioned again in Acts 11:19. Here, it is a refuge for Christians from persecution. In the Scripture Antioch represents a "type" of the new life given to believers after having accepted Jesus Christ as their personal Saviour.&lt;br /&gt;To fully understand the light in which the Bible presents Antioch in Acts 11, we must look at the context in which chapter 11 is written. In the preceding chapter (Acts 10) God plainly shows that He is calling out a following from among the Gentiles. In the following chapter (Acts 12) God shows that He is not going to use Jerusalem as the center of the New Testament church (Acts 12:1-4).&lt;br /&gt;Our Antioch&lt;br /&gt;Antioch, the new center, is away from the Gentile centers of Alexandria, Athens, and Rome and the Jewish center of Jerusalem. Antioch symbolizes the Christian's new life, apart from the heathenism of the Gentiles and ritualism of Judaism. II Corinthians 5:17 says, "Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new." When a Gentile is saved, he is to leave his heathenistic lifestyle for a new spiritual location in Christ. Likewise, when a Jew is saved, he is to leave his ritualism for a new spiritual location in Christ. In Galatians 3:28 Paul states that, "There is neither Jew nor Greek...for ye are all one in Christ Jesus." In I Corinthians 10:32 he divides mankind into three groups, "Jews...Gentiles...the Church of God." As God gives born again man a new spiritual location, He also gave His new young church a new physical location.&lt;br /&gt;Please notice that after Acts chapter 12, the other apostles are left alone at Jerusalem and are mentioned only one last time in the narrative. This is in Acts 21:18 where they briefly rejoice in Paul's report and then get preoccupied with the law! Paul in Galatians 2:11 had to rebuke Peter of this very thing when he came to Antioch and tried to exercise the same legalistic teaching of Judaism on the New Testament church there. Obviously God was using Antioch and Antiochian Christians to forge a new practice of worshipping Him, different from the Old Testament Judaism and the Gentile mythology and heathenism.&lt;br /&gt;God's Move&lt;br /&gt;Acts 11:20 shows the beginning of God's settlement in Antioch. "And some of them were men of Cyprus and Cyrene, which, when they were come to Antioch, spake unto the Grecians, preaching the Lord Jesus." In Acts 11:22, Barnabas, one of the most important figures of the New Testament, moves from Jerusalem to Antioch. He is the man who is responsible for Paul being in the ministry. It was Barnabas who went to Tarsus to get Paul, then named Saul, in Acts 11:25. Upon finding him, Barnabas brought him back to Antioch, not Jerusalem (Acts 11:26). So we see that the primary figure of the New Testament church actually began his ministry in Antioch. Paul had visited Jerusalem in Acts 9:26-29 and had even preached there, but his ministry to the Gentiles really began when he departed from Antioch in Acts 13:1-3 with Barnabas.&lt;br /&gt;We must also notice that it was at Antioch that the disciples were called "Christians" for the first time (Acts 11:26). In verse 27 of Acts 11 we find that the prophets from the Jerusalem church left it to settle in Antioch. In verse 29 of Acts 11, we even see that it was necessary for the Christians at Antioch to send relief down to their brethren in Jerusalem.&lt;br /&gt;As we mentioned before, Paul's first missionary journey originated from Antioch in Acts 13:1-3. The Bible states in verse 2 that the Holy Ghost "called" them. It was in Antioch that God chose these men. Upon returning from their trip (Acts 14:26-28) they came back to Antioch, not Alexandria; not Jerusalem.&lt;br /&gt;When some "Christian" Judaizers came up to Antioch from Jerusalem and began to teach the believers there that, "Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved" (Acts 15:1), Paul and Barnabas confronted them. Afterwards, Paul and Barnabas went down and spoke with the apostles concerning this. They formed a council and returned to their beloved Antioch with a written statement to the effect that Judaism had no hold over the New Testament church.&lt;br /&gt;Upon returning to Antioch, Paul and Barnabas took with them chosen men of the Jerusalem church, Silas being one of them (Acts 15:22). They all returned to Jerusalem but Silas (Acts 15:33,34), and he is the only one whom we find recorded in New Testament history. After Acts chapter 11 and the move to Antioch, God used only those who left Jerusalem and settled in Antioch! Such is the case with Paul, Barnabas, Silas, and Mark. Paul and Barnabas reside at Antioch (Acts 15:35) and depart from there again in verse 40.&lt;br /&gt;Notice that Paul sets his mind to go back to Jerusalem in Acts 20:22, knowing that it is against God's will as we find in Acts 20:23; 21:4, and again in 21:10-12. He goes to Jerusalem in spite of God's warning against it and is seized in Acts 21:30, thus beginning the end of his ministry! This plainly teaches that a Christian is not to return to his "old" life in any way, shape, or form and should stand firm in his "new location" in Christ. It also shows that if there will be any center for New Testament Christianity, it will be found in Antioch.&lt;br /&gt;It may well be that many of the "originals" that we have heard so much about were written right there in Antioch!&lt;br /&gt;Egypt is a type of this world. Antioch is a type of a Christian's new life in Christ. Which one do you think that God would use to preserve His Word?&lt;br /&gt;God will not do anything contrary to His nature. It would not be consistent with God's nature to use Alexandria, Egypt to preserve His Word when He paints such a dismal picture of it in Scripture. In fact, there is no record of any of the New Testament Christians ever visiting there.&lt;br /&gt;Antioch, on the other hand, was greatly used by God as the center of New Testament Christianity. Paul never took up residence in Jerusalem, but always returned to Antioch. Looking from the spiritual and practical aspect, Antioch would obviously be the logical location of the true Bible text.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chapter 6:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Witnesses&lt;br /&gt;It would be extremely beneficial at this point if we could simply produce the original autographs for examination. This would greatly simplify the operation of establishing correctly the New Testament text. But this simply cannot happen. It has long been acknowledged by scholars that we no longer have the "originals." They have long since passed from the scene. This is due to the fact that scribes were known to have destroyed worn out MSS after they had copied them. Apparently the early church valued the words of the original more than the original itself. Therefore, the readings of the originals must be preserved with us somewhere, or else God's words have "passed away" which we surely know, from the Scriptural record, cannot happen. (Psalms 12:6, 7 and Matthew 24:35). We must review the witnesses of the Bible record which have come to us through history. We will be required to keep two things in mind:&lt;br /&gt;1. There is a marked disagreement between the two basic families of readings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. Due to the truth above, we must remember our spiritual considerations as well as historical. Remember, the Bible is like no other book. All other books are written and then cast adrift on the sea of time; this is not the case with the Bible. We must remember that God had His hand in its inception and will be seen to have His hand in its journey through history to the present. It must also be remembered that just as God will be active in its preservation, Satan will be active in attempting to disrupt or destroy it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The "hard" evidence at hand today available for our examination consists of three groups:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Copies&lt;br /&gt;1. Copies - Since there are no originals, every record of Scripture will be a copy. Copies are divided into three groups:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A. Miniscules - These are by far the most numerous of extant copies which we possess. Miniscules in Greek are like the lower case letters of our alphabet. The oldest copies of this type are papyrus MSS which were sewn together into a roll or scroll. Papyrus was an inexpensive paper somewhat like newsprint. Some were also written on vellum scrolls. Vellum is made from animal skins. This was used because of its durability although it was more expensive than papyrus.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In early copies the words were written end to end with no space in between. Words like God, Son, Father were abbreviated in this manner: God - gd, Son - sn, Father - ftr. Later MSS separated the words for ease of reading. An example is shown here: "No-man-hath-seen-gd-at-any-time-the-only-begotten-sn-which-is-in-the-bosom-of-the-ftr-he-hath-declared-him." (John 1:18).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Some miniscules were composed in book form instead of a scroll. These are known as codice (plural). Codex is the singular form. These also were written on either papyrus or vellum. In some cases, all that remains of a scroll or codex are fragments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;B. Majuscules or Uncials -- These are equivalent to the upper case letters of our alphabet. In the same verse as above, John 1: 18, letters of our alphabet would appear in this manner in an uncial MSS:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NOMANHATSEENGDATANY TIMETHEONLYBEGOTTEN SNWHICHISINTHEBOSOMOFTHE FTRHEHATHDECLAREDHIM.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Majuscules MSS exist in fewer numbers than miniscules and do not appear until the 4th Century.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;C. Lectionaries -- These are equivalent to the "responsive readings" found in the back of today's hymnals. Due to the shortage of copies of Scripture, lectionaries were used to put key verses into the hands of the people. In many cases their readings are very early, i.e., closer to the originals.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Versions&lt;br /&gt;2. Our second group of Biblical witnesses are the ancient versions. God chose to write the New Testament in Greek, but He did not choose to keep it in Greek only. The early Greek MSS were translated into other languages in order that the true Word of God could be put into the hands of people in other lands. Some versions such as the Peshitto (or Peschito), a Syrian translation, and the Old Latin Vulgate (vulgate means "vulgar," i.e., "common") are actually older than our oldest uncial MSS. The Peshitto was translated from the Greek in about 150 A.D. The Old Latin Vulgate was translated about 157 A.D.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Other well known versions are the Gothic, Sahidic, Bohairic, and Coptic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Church Fathers&lt;br /&gt;3. Our third group is the early church fathers. These are the men who led the Christians in the first few centuries after the New Testament was completed. We have record of their early sermons, books, and commentaries. They will be able to provide us with much information on disputed passages. Many may have seen the original autographs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here we now have our three sources of information. They are copies, versions, and church fathers. These three groups combined to give us in excess of 5,250 witnesses.9 Over 3,000 of these are Greek MSS.10 With this many extant MSS, versions, and the fathers for reference, we should have little trouble determining the Greek text of the original New Testament autographs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Taking Sides&lt;br /&gt;These surviving witnesses of the Greek New Testament text which we now possess are found to generally fall into two groups, or "texts." This is where we begin to find some major problems. We find that these two texts disagree consistently concerning the major doctrines of the Bible. They are found to disagree on readings concerning the virgin birth of Jesus Christ, the blood atonement, Christ's second coming, the deity of Christ, and many other fundamental Christian doctrines. It is for this reason that we must examine our witnesses to determine if their testimony is accurate (God's text) or if they are fraudulently misleading (Satan's text). Remember our ground rules!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Good Guys&lt;br /&gt;The first of these two texts which we will examine is the Majority Text. This is the text which will be found to uphold the major Christian doctrines which are so vital to our fundamental beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Majority Text has been known throughout history by several names. It has been known as the Byzantine Text, the Imperial Text, the Traditional Text, and the Reformation Text, as well as the Majority Text. This text culminates in the Textus Receptus or "Received Text" which is the basis for the King James Bible, which we know also as the Authorized Version.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I do not desire to add one more name to the list, but in the interest of finding the most accurate term to describe this text, and due to its universal reception by orthodox Christians through history, we shall refer to this text as the "Universal Text."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dr. Hills justifies this choice: "There is now greater reason than ever to believe that the Byzantine Text, which is found in the vast majority of the Greek New Testament manuscripts and which was used well-nigh universally throughout the Greek Church for many centuries, is a faithful reproduction of the original New Testament and is the divinely appointed standard by which all New Testament manuscripts and all divergent readings must be judged."11 (Emphasis mine.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We describe this text with the term "Universal," because it represents the majority of extant MSS which represent the original autographs. Professor Hodges of Dallas Theological Seminary explains, "The manuscript tradition of an ancient book will, under any but the most exceptional conditions, multiply in a reasonably regular fashion with the result that the copies nearest the autograph will normally have the largest number of descendants."12&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even Dr. Hort is forced to admit this as Professor Hodges points out in his footnote, "This truism was long ago conceded (somewhat grudgingly) by Hort. A theoretical presumption indeed remains that a majority of extant documents is more likely to represent a majority of ancestral documents at each state of transmission than vice versa."13&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Professor Hodges concludes, "Thus the Majority text, upon which the King James Version is based, has in reality the strongest claim possible to be regarded as an authentic representation of the original text. This claim is quite independent of any shifting consensus of scholarly judgment about its readings and is based on the objective reality of its dominance in the transmissional history of the New Testament text."14&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any corruption to the New Testament text would obviously have to begin after the original autographs were completed, or there would be no originals to corrupt! If the originals and the first corruptions of those originals multiplied at the same rate, the correct text would always be found in the majority of MSS. Add to this the fact that the orthodox Christian Church would reject the corruptions and refuse to copy them, and we would find that the correct text would be in the vast majority, universally accepted as authentic, while the corrupt text would be represented by an elite minority. These are exactly the circumstances which exist in the MS evidence available today! Fuller records, "Miller has shown that the Traditional Text predominated in the writings of the Church Fathers in every age from the very first."15&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Universal Text is that which travels north from Jerusalem to Antioch, the "gateway to Europe," heading for England. Upon arrival in England it would be ready for translation into the language through which God has chosen to spread His Gospel - English.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From Antioch (remember our study of Antioch), the Universal Text was sent up into Europe. From there it spread through Syria and Europe through its translation into the Syrian Peshitto version and the Old Latin Vulgate. There are still 350 copies of the Peshitto in existence today as a testimony to this widespread usage in the years since 150 A.D.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The "Original" Vulgate&lt;br /&gt;The Old Latin Vulgate was used by the Christians in the churches of the Waldenses, Gauls, Celts, Albigenses, and other fundamental groups throughout Europe. This Latin version became so used and beloved by orthodox Christians and was in such common use by the common people that it assumed the term "Vulgate" as a name. Vulgate comes from "vulgar" which is the Latin word for "common." It was so esteemed for its faithfulness to the deity of Christ and its accurate reproductions of the originals, that these early Christians let Jerome's Roman Catholic translation "sit on the shelf." Jerome's translation was not used by the true Biblical Christians for almost a millenium after it was translated from corrupted manuscripts by Jerome in 380 A.D. Even then it only came into usage due to the death of Latin as a common language, and the violent, wicked persecutions waged against true believers by Pope Gregory IX during his reign from 1227 to 1242 A.D. 16&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Crooked Tactics&lt;br /&gt;The Old Latin Vulgate had come into existence no later than 157 A.D. The Latin version of Jerome, translated by order of the Roman Catholic Church, was published in about 380 A.D. It was rejected by real Christians until approximately 1280 A.D. The Roman Catholic Church chose the name "Vulgate" or "Common" for Jerome's translation in an attempt to deceive loyal Christians into thinking that it was the true common Bible of the people. This is the same tactic used by the New Scofield Reference Bible (1967) and the Common Bible (1973). The former claims to be an Authorized King James Version, when in fact it is not (check the margin). The latter's name falsely implies that it is the Bible in "common" use, when in fact the Bible in common use is the Authorized Version of 1611! It would seem that such deception lacks a little in Christian ethics, if not honesty.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is plain to see that the Universal Text has not only been universally accepted by the faithful Christians down through the centuries, but it was responsible for keeping the Roman Catholic Church contained to southern Italy for years. It was not until the Roman Catholic Church successfully eliminated this Book through persecutions, torture, Bible burnings, and murder that it could capture Europe in its web of superstitious paganism.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Perhaps we should learn a lesson. Where the Universal Text of the King James Bible reigns, God blesses. Once it is eliminated for a less "clean" text, God withdraws His blessing. Oh, that America could but look at what has happened to England since the corrupt Revised Version was published! Perversion has been the father of every "revision" since, on either side of the Atlantic. Yes, the sun began to set on the British Empire in 1904, when the British Foreign Bible Society changed from the pure Textus Receptus to the Egyptian text collated by Eberhard Nestle.17&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bad Guys&lt;br /&gt;The other text which we must investigate is the Minority Text. This is the text which is found to be untrue to the beloved doctrines of Scripture such as the virgin birth, the deity of Christ, the blood atonement, the Trinity, and others. This is also the text which is used in every translation of the Bible since the Revised Version of 1881.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Its two outstanding trademarks in history are that orthodox Christianity has never used it and that the Roman Catholic Church has militantly (read that "bloodily") supported it. We shall say more about this matter later.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Minority Text is also known as the Egyptian Text, (remember our study of Egypt), the Hesychian Text, and the Alexandrian Text (remember our study of Alexandria), which was the basis for the critical Greek Text of Brooke Foss Wescott and Fenton John Anthony Hort. The Wescott and Hort Text of 1881 was collated with Weymouth's third edition and Tischendorf's eighth edition by Eberhard Nestle in 1898 to become what is known as the Nestle's Greek New Testament.18 This is the text used in all "modern" translations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The most notable MSS in the text consist of a handful of uncial MSS of the 4th and 5th Centuries. These uncials have been found to be error ridden and untrustworthy and found even to disagree among themselves.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of these MSS is called Sinaiticus and is represented by the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet, Aleph. This MS from all outward appearances looks very beautiful. It is written in book form (codex) on vellum. It contains 147 1/2 leaves. The pages are 15" by 13 1/2" with four columns of 48 lines per page. It contains many spurious books such as the "Shepherd of Hermes," the "Epistle of Barnabas," and even the "Didache."19 This MS has survived time well, but being in good physical shape by no means makes its contents trustworthy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The great Greek scholar, Dr. Scrivener, points this out in his historic work A Full Collation of the Codex Sinaiticus. He speaks concerning correctional alterations made to the MS: "The Codex is covered with such alterations...brought in by at least ten different revisors, some of them systematically spread over every page, others occasional or limited to separated portions of the MS, many of these being contemporaneous with the first writer, but for the greater part belonging to the sixth or seventh century."20&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dr. Alfred Martin echos this, "Aleph shows the works of ten different correctors down through the centuries."21&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The corrections are so obvious as to induce Dr. Burgon to comment therefore on Dr. Tischendorf's willingness to exalt this badly marred MS: "With the blindness proverbially ascribed to parental love, Tischendorf follows Aleph, though the carelessness that reigns over that manuscript is visible to all who examine it."22&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;May I note here that Dr. Tischendorf was the discoverer of Codex Sinaiticus. He found it in St. Cathrine's Monestary on Mt. Sinai in February of 1859. It was, of all places, in the wastebasket!"23&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since this MS was of the 4th Century, Tischendorf, deceived by the outmoded philosophy "older is better," immediately altered his 7th edition of the Greek New Testament in over 3,500 places. He had claimed that this 7th edition (1856-59) had been perfect and could not be superceded. His 8th edition (1865-72), based primarily on Aleph, was apparently 3,500 times more perfect!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;False Witness from Rome&lt;br /&gt;Another MS belonging to this family is called Vaticanus. It is often referred to by the letter "B." As its name implies, it is in the Vatican library at Rome (remember our enemy). No one knows when it was placed in the Vatican library, but its existence was first made known in 1841. This MS is also in the form of a book and written on vellum. It contains 759 pages which are 10" by 10 1/2" with three columns of 41 lines per page.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This Codex omits many portions of Scripture vital to Christian doctrine. Vaticanus omits Genesis 1:1 through Genesis 46:28; Psalms 106 through 138; Matthew 16:2, 3; Romans 16:24; the Pauline Pastorial Epistles; Revelation; and everything in Hebrews after 9:14.24&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It seems suspicious indeed that a MS possessed by the Roman Catholic Church omits the portion of the book of Hebrews which exposes the "mass" as totally useless. (Please read Hebrews 10:10-12). The "mass" in conjunction with the false doctrine of purgatory go hand-in-hand to form a perpetual money making machine for Rome. Without one or the other, the Roman Catholic Church would go broke! It also omits portions of Scripture telling of the creation (Genesis), the prophetic details of the crucifixion (Psalms 22), and, of course, the portion which prophesies of the destruction of Babylon (Rome), the great whore of Revelation chapter 17.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Vaticanus, though intact physically, is found to be of very poor literary quality. Dr. Martin declares, "'B' exhibits numerous places where the scribe has written the same word or phrase twice in succession."25 Dr. J. Smythe states, "From one end to the other, the whole manuscript has been traveled over by the pen of some...scribe of about the tenth century."26&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If Vaticanus was considered a trustworthy text originally, the mass of corrections and scribal changes obviously render its testimony highly suspicious and questionable.&lt;br /&gt;The corrupt and unreliable nature of these two MSS is best summed up by one who has thoroughly examined them, John W. Burgon: "The impurity of the text exhibited by these codices is not a question of opinion but fact...In the Gospels alone, Codex B (Vatican) leaves out words or whole clauses no less than 1,491 times. It bears traces of careless transcriptions on every page. Codex Sinaiticus abounds with errors of the eye and pen to an extent not indeed unparalleled, but happily rather unusual in documents of first-rate importance. On many occasions 10, 20, 30, 40 words are dropped through very carelessness. Letters and words, even whole sentences, are frequently written twice over, or begun and immediately cancelled; while that gross blunder whereby a clause is omitted because it happens to end in the same words as the clause preceding, occurs no less than 115 times in the New Testament."27&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If we are to be thorough and discriminatory in our evaluation of the true New Testament text, then we must not - we cannot - overlook these facts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How did these MSS come into being? How did it happen that they should be beautiful to the eye, yet within contain such vile and devastating corruptions? It seems that these uncial MSS along with the papyrus MSS included in this category all resulted from a revision of the true, or Universal Text. This revision was enacted in Egypt (remember our study of Egypt) by Egyptian scribes!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Prior to documenting this statement, it will be needful to identify several of the uncial and papyrus MSS which will be referred to in the documentation. These are uncial manuscripts A, B, C, D, and Aleph. Also included are the Chester Beatty Papyri, designated as P45, P46, P47, and the Bodmer Papyri, designated as P66 and P75.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Local Mess&lt;br /&gt;It seems that this type of text was a local text of Alexandria, Egypt (remember our study of Alexandria) of which Eusebius made fifty copies to fulfill a request by Emperor Constantine. Unfortunately Eusebius turned to the education center in Egypt and got a "scholarly revision" instead of turning to Antioch for the pure text which was universally accepted by the true Christians.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why would Eusebius choose Alexandria over Antioch? Primarily because he was a great admirer of Origen, an Egyptian scholar. Origen, though once exalted by modern day Christianity as a trustworthy authority, has since been found to have been a heretic who interpreted the Bible in the light of Greek philosophy (remember our study of Athens). He propagated the heresy that Jesus Christ was a "created" God.28 This is a false doctrine clung to by Jehovah's Witnesses of our day, who strangely enough get their teaching from the corrupt Alexandrian Text's rendition of John 1:1-5 and John 3:13, a corruption which Origen is responsible for when he revised the Universal Text to read in agreement with his personal heresy!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Origen himself said, "The Scriptures are of little use to those who understand them as they are written."29 Which explains Bishop Marsh's statement, "Whenever therefore grammatical interpretation produced a sense which in Origen's opinion was irrational or impossible, in other words was irrational or impossible according to the philosophy which Origen had learned at Alexandria, he then departs from the literal."30 (Emphasis mine.) Dr. Adam Clarke claims also that Origen was the first person to teach purgatory. 31&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Total Corruption&lt;br /&gt;Where did this "Local Text," from which all new Bible translations since 1881 are rendered, originate? Let us see what evidence scholars have unearthed in a search to discover its source.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kurt Aland "proposes that the text of P75 and B represent a revision of a local text of Egypt which was enforced as the dominant text in that particular ecclesiastical province."32&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Professor Hodges assures us, "Already scholars are willing to concede a common ancestry for P75 and B. We can postulate here that this common ancestor and P66 meet even further back in the stream of transmission...It is quite possible, then that all three manuscripts go back ultimately to a single parent manuscript in which this emendation was originally made."33&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dean Burgon remarks, "As for the origin of these two curiosities, it can perforce only be divined from their contents, that they exhibit fabricated texts is demonstrable. No amount of honest copying - preserved in for any number of centuries - could by possibility have resulted in two such documents. Separated from one another in actual date by 50, perhaps by 100 years, they must needs have branched all from a common corrupt ancestor, and straightway become exposed to fresh depraving influence."34&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dr. Edward Hills concludes, "The best way to explain this situation is to suppose that it represents an intentional neglect of the Traditional Text on the part of those ancient Alexandrian scribes who kept revising the text of Paprus 75 until finally they created the B text."35&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He also states Aland's opinion: "Aland thinks it possible that the Chester Beatty Papyri also came from this same place."36&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That tedious lawyer and former Supreme Court Justice, Philip Mauro, has aptly determined, "It should be observed, before we proceed with this question, that the agreeing testimony (where they do agree) of the Vatican and Sinaitic MSS cannot be properly regarded as having the force of two independent witnesses; for there are sufficient evidences both internal and external to warrant the conclusion that these two Codices are very closely related, that they are, in fact, copies of the same original, itself a very corrupt transcript of the New Testament."37&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He also states, "It is admitted on all hands that the Text used as the basis of the Authorized Version correctly represents a Text known to have been widely (if not everywhere) in use as early as the second century (for the Peschito and Old Latin Versions, corroborated by patristic quotations afford ample proof of that). On the other hand, it is now known that the two Codices we are discussing represent anything but copies of a bad original, made worse in the copying."38&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also seems generally agreed that this Local Text was used for a basis of the 50 Bibles which Eusebius supplied to Constantine.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The noted Greek scholar, A.T. Roberson, states, "Constantine himself ordered fifty Greek Bibles from Eusebius, Bishop of Caesarea, for the Churches of Constantinople. It is quite possible that Aleph and B are two of these fifty, though the actual copying was probably done in Egypt or by Egyptian scribes."39&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gregory adds, "This manuscript (Vaticanus) is supposed, as we have seen, to have come from the same place as the Sinaitic Manuscript. I have said that these two show connections with each other and that they would suit very well as a pair of the fifty manuscripts written at Caesarea for Constantine the Great."40&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To which Burgon and Miller testify, "Constantine applied to Eusebius for fifty handsome copies, amongst which it is not impossible that the manuscripts B and Aleph were to be actually found."41&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dr. David Fuller finalizes, "Age alone cannot prove that a manuscript is correct. B and Aleph probably owe their preservation to the fact that they were written on vellum, whereas most other documents of that period were written on papyrus. Many students, including Tischendorf and Hort, have thought them to be two of the fifty copies which Eusebius had prepared under the order of Constantine for use in the churches of Constantinople. They are no doubt beautiful manuscripts, but their texts show scribal carelessness. B exhibits numerous places where the scribe has written the same word or phrases twice in succession. Aleph shows the marks of ten different correctors down through the centuries. Burgon's excoriation of Wescott and Hort's method cannot be considered too strong in the light of the facts concerning the character of these two manuscripts."42 Who could be responsible for the corruption of the universally accepted text of the New Testament?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wilkenson reports, "Beginning shortly after the death of the apostle John, four names stand out in prominence whose teaching contributed both to the victorious heresy and to the final issuing of manuscripts of a corrupt New Testament. These names are: 1. Justin Martyr; 2. Tatian; 3. Clement of Alexandria; and 4. Origen."43&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Local Alexandrian text fell into disuse about 500 A.D. while the original Universal Text was spreading true Christianity throughout Europe.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hoskier reports this in his statement: "Those who accept the Wescott and Hort text are basing their accusations of untruth as to the Gospellists upon an Egyptian revision current 200 to 450 A.D. and abandoned between 500 to 1881, merely revised in our day and stamped as genuine."44&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So we see that once a pure copy of the Universal Text had been carried down into Egypt, it was recopied. During the process of this recopying, it was revised by men who did not revere it as truly the Word of God. This text was examined by the critical eye of Greek philosophy and Egyptian morals. These men saw nothing wrong with putting the Book in subjection to their opinion instead of their opinion being in subjection to the Book. This process produced a text which was local to the educational center of Alexandria, Egypt. This text went no farther than southern Italy where the Roman Church found its unstable character perfect for overthrowing the true Word of God which was being used universally by the true Christians.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At this point, I believe it will be helpful to study the ruthless Roman Catholic Church to more clearly understand her part in all new translations of the Bible since 1881.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chapter 7:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Enemy&lt;br /&gt;"It is necessary to salvation that every man should submit to the Pope." (Boniface VIII Unum Sanctum, 1303.)&lt;br /&gt;"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." Ephesians 2:8, 9.&lt;br /&gt;Here lie two totally contradictory statements. They cannot both be correct. The one which you believe will depend on which authority you accept.&lt;br /&gt;The Roman Catholic Church has long been antagonistic to the doctrine of salvation by grace. If salvation is by grace, who needs "mass?" If salvation is by grace, who needs to fear purgatory? If Jesus Christ is our mediator, who needs the Pope? If the Pope cannot intimidate people into obeying him, how can he force a nation to obey him?&lt;br /&gt;The true Bible is the arch-enemy of the Roman Catholic Church. Rome can only rule over ignorant, fear-filled people. The true Bible turns "unlearned and ignorant" men into gospel preachers and casts out "all fear."&lt;br /&gt;Rome must find a way to supplant the true gospel with "another gospel." The only way to do this is to eliminate our faith in the Word of God.&lt;br /&gt;Rome received the corrupted Local Text of Alexandria, Egypt and further revised it to suit her own needs. Some scholars call this revision the "Western" text. This, of course, makes it part of the already corrupted text and, therefore, still contains the Local Text readings. This text suited the Roman Catholic Church well, since it attacked the doctrines of the Bible. Rome is wise. To attack salvation by grace directly would expose her plot to all. So instead she used subtly. The Roman Catholic Church strips Jesus Christ of His deity, separates the divine title "Lord" and "Christ" from the human name Jesus, having the thief on the cross address Him as "Jesus" instead of "Lord" (Luke 23:42). It also removes the testimony to His deity in Acts 8:37, and it eliminates the Trinity in I John 5:7.&lt;br /&gt;You may ask, "Would not a weakening of the place of Jesus Christ weaken the Roman Catholic Church's reason for even existing?" The answer is "No." The Roman Catholic Church does not even claim to represent the gospel of Jesus Christ. Romanist Karl Adam admits this: "We Catholics acknowledge readily, without any shame - nay with pride - that Catholicism cannot be identified simply and wholly with primitive Christianity, nor even with the Gospel of Christ."45&lt;br /&gt;The vacancy left by the removal of Christ would be easily filled by Mary and other "saints" along with a chain of ritualism so rigid that no practitioner would have time to really "think" about the true gospel.&lt;br /&gt;Invasion&lt;br /&gt;The true gospel was fast spreading all over Europe due to the Old Latin translation of the Universal Text into the "vulgar" or "common" language. This Bible became known as the "Vulgate" since it was used so commonly all over Europe.&lt;br /&gt;Rome enlisted the help of a loyal subject by the name of Jerome. He quickly translated the corrupt Local Text into Latin. This version included the Apocryphal books, fourteen books which no Bible-believing Christian accepts as authentic. To insure its success over the Old Latin, the Roman Catholic Church gave it the name "Vulgate," meaning "common." There was one problem which the Roman Catholic Church did not anticipate, the same problem which the businessmen publishing new versions cannot seem to avoid. The common people recognized the true Word of God because the Holy Spirit bears witness to it! They refuse to accept other versions!&lt;br /&gt;True, many versions have been sold in the past and are being sold now. Yet, this is primarily due to the media "blitz" by which EVERY new Bible has been introduced since 1881. This is the same tactic used by Satan in Genesis chapter 3. Notice his first recorded words. Do you believe that Satan just walked up to Eve and asked, "Yea, hath God said?" No! In Genesis 3:1 we are picking up in the middle of a conversation, possibly one of many. Satan paved the way for his attack on God's Word by a little "softening up" publicity. Christians today do not realize that they "need a better translation" until they are told so by the Bible salesman a few times. Suddenly, they "realize their need" for a translation which is "closer to the originals." (Most of these Christians have never even read the one they have.) The next thing they know, they have eaten the fruit, and God's blessing is gone. To get God's blessing back, obviously, they need the next "thoroughly reliable" translation.&lt;br /&gt;This is not an overstatement. An example of the "Bible business" is revealed by Dr. Edward Hills. He speaks in reference to the committee of the American Standard Version promising not to publish their translation at the same time as the English Revised Version. He points out, "They promised not to publish their own revised edition of the Bible until 14 years after the publication of the English Revised Version (R.V.), and in exchange for this concession were given the privilege of publishing in an appendix to this version a list of the readings which they favored but which the British revisers declined to adopt."46 It was obvious to these "contenders for the faith" that two new Bibles hitting the market at the same time just would not be conducive to good profits. These men are obviously "led by the spirit" but I am not entirely sure it is "Holy." It is a sad thing when men make merchandise of the Word of God.&lt;br /&gt;The name "Vulgate" on the flyleaf of Jerome's unreliable translation did little to help sales. The Old Latin Bible, or "Italic" as it is sometimes called, was held fast by all true Christians who upheld the authority of the Bible over the authority of education.&lt;br /&gt;Dr. Wilkenson informs us in reference to the Old Latin, "Not only were such translations in existence long before the Vulgate was adopted by the Papacy, and well established, but the people for centuries refused to supplant their old Latin Bibles by the Vulgate." He records Jacobus' words, "The old Latin versions were used longest by the western Christians who would not bow to the authority of Rome - e.g. the Donatists; the Irish in Ireland, Britain, and the Continent; the Albigenses: etc;"47&lt;br /&gt;Dr. Wilkenson also records the words from the "Forum" of June 1887, "The old Italic version, into rude Low Latin of the second century, held its own as long as Latin continued to be the language of the people. The critical version of Jerome never displaced it, and only replaced it when the Latin ceased to be a living language, and became the language of the learned. The Gothic version of Ulfilas, in the same way, held its own until the tongues in which it was written ceased to exist."48&lt;br /&gt;So we see that the Vulgate of Jerome was unused and unwanted by the true Christians for over nine hundred years. This caused the Roman Church much grief. There was only one remedy to the situation, eliminate the "other" old, archaic Bible. If it was necessary to violently eliminate the people who used this faithful translation, then they did it.&lt;br /&gt;The Plot&lt;br /&gt;The Roman Catholic Church has long been known for its persecution of true New Testament Christians. Beginning in about 600 A.D., persecution hounded these Christ-honoring, Bible-loving people. Pope Gregory I went so far as to systematically destroy and alter historical records pertaining to these Christians. Concerning one group, the Waldenses (or Waldensians), Dr. Gilly reports, "It is a singular thing, that the destruction or rapine, which has been so fatal to Waldensian documents, would have pursued them even to the place of security, to which all, that remained, were consigned by Morland, in 1658, the library of the University of Cambridge. The most ancient of these relics were ticketed in seven packets, distinguished by letters of the alphabet, from A to G. The whole of these were missing when I made inquiry for them in 1823."49&lt;br /&gt;Gilly also enlightens us with this report of the actions of Rome: "The agents of the Papacy have done their utmost to calumniate their character, to destroy the records of their noble past and to leave no trace of the cruel persecution they underwent. They went even further - they made use of words written against ancient heresies to strike out the name of heretics and fill the blank space by inserting the name of the Waldenses. Just as if, in a book written to record the lawless deeds of some bandit, like Jesse James, his name should be stricken out and the name of Abraham Lincoln substituted. The Jesuit Gretserin a book written against the heretics of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, put the name Waldenses at the point where he struck out the name of these heretics."50 We find that Rome's wicked persecutions of the Waldenses culminated in a devastating massacre of their number in 1655.51 They were hounded as "heretics" until the mid 1800's when their persistence paid off and the vile actions against them ceased.52&lt;br /&gt;Counterattack&lt;br /&gt;A major blow to the authority of Rome came in 1517, when a young Catholic priest by the name of Martin Luther nailed his historic 95 theses on the church door in Wittenburg. The nail drove deep into the hearts of truly born-again Christians who had for centuries been laboring under the tyranny of the Roman Catholic Church. The people flocked to their new, brave leader. From this, Lutheranism was established, but even more important, the fires of the Reformation were kindled.&lt;br /&gt;The tide of the Reformation soon came sweeping across all of Europe until it washed the very shores of England. The already weakened authority of Rome was devastated by the onslaught of truth. Two-thirds of Europe was swallowed up in what can probably be referred to as the greatest spiritual awakening of all time. The Reformation was vital to the then future translation of the King James Bible. England, too, had been shackled to the hierarchy of Rome. It was the removal of these superstitious bonds that created the spirit in England of the supremacy of the Scripture which was prevalent at the time of the translation of the King James Bible. This would not have been the case had Luther not sparked the Reformation.&lt;br /&gt;The most vital and immovable weapon in Luther's arsenal came in the form of his German translation of the New Testament of 1522. This put the pure words of the Universal Text back into the hands of "Bible-starved" Christians. The Reformation ran wild across the continent, fueled by this faithful translation. Rome at this point was totally helpless to stop it. The Papacy needed something with which to fight this dreaded scourge of truth. It turned in desperation to two different sources.&lt;br /&gt;In 1545 the Roman Catholic Church formed the Council of Trent. The Council of Trent systematically denied the teachings of the Reformation. The Council decreed that "tradition" was of equal authority with the Bible. It decreed also that justification was not by faith alone in the shed blood of Jesus Christ. In fact, it stated that anyone believing in this vital Bible doctrine was cursed. The Council's exact words are: "If anyone saith that justifying faith is nothing else but confidence in the divine mercy which remits sins for Christ's sake or that this confidence alone is that whereby we are justified, let him be anathema."53 (Emphasis mine.)&lt;br /&gt;We now see that the Roman Catholic Church is guilty of officially cursing Jesus Christ! Would God use this church to preserve His Words?&lt;br /&gt;The Council of Trent was viewed by the Protestants as somewhat of a "paper tiger." It certainly did not hold any authority over them. The barn door appeared securely locked, but the horse was triumphantly roaming all over the countryside! Yet there was to be an enemy much more feared than the boisterous Council of Trent - the Jesuits!&lt;br /&gt;The Diabolical Jesuits&lt;br /&gt;The Society of Jesus was founded in 1534 by a Spaniard by the name of Ignatius Loyola. Loyola was born don Inigo Lopez de Racalde, in the castle of Loyola in the province of Guipuzcoa in 1491. He was known as a youth to be treacherous, brutal and vindictive. He was referred to as an unruly and conceited soldier. Loyola was wounded at the siege of Pampeluna in 1521. Crippled by a broken leg and plagued by a limp the rest of his life, he sought "spiritual" conquests.54&lt;br /&gt;Loyola produced an elite force of men, extremely loyal to the Pope, who would set about to undermine Protestantism and "heresy" throughout the world. Their training would require fourteen years of testing and trials designed to leave them with no will at all. They were to learn to be obedient. Loyola taught that their only desire would be to serve the Pope.&lt;br /&gt;The head of the Jesuits is called the "Black Pope" and holds the title of General, just as in the military. That they were to be unquestionably loyal to this man and their church is reflected in Loyola's own words, "Let us be convinced that all is well and right when the superior commands it," also, "...even if God gave you an animal without sense for master, you will not hesitate to obey him, as master and guide, because God ordained it to be so." He further elaborates, "We must see black as white, if the Church says so."55&lt;br /&gt;The Devil's Plainclothesmen&lt;br /&gt;What would be the method used by the Jesuits to achieve their goals? Would it be military might? Would it be acts of daring? Would it be a violent revolution to install a Roman sympathizer as ruler? No, these actions would all have their day of usefulness, later.&lt;br /&gt;The Jesuits were to be the Vatican's "plainclothesmen." They were founded to be a secret society, a society that was to slide in behind the scenes and capture the positions of leadership. The Jesuits knew that to capture the leaders of any particular country or organization is to conquer the entire body.&lt;br /&gt;Edmund Paris, the noted French author and leading authority on the Roman Catholic Church, has written many books exposing the true spirit and goals of the Vatican. He points out, "Politics are their main field of action, as all the efforts of these 'directors' concentrate on one aim: the submission of the world to the papacy, and to attain this the 'heads' must be conquered first."56&lt;br /&gt;The Jesuit priests were not required to dress in the traditional garb of the Roman Catholic priests. In fact, their dress was a major part of their disguise. They presented themselves to the world in a variety of manners. They passed themselves off in a number of ways. Paris asserts that this is still true today, "It is the same today: the 33,000 official members of the Society operate all over the world in the capacity of her personnel, officers of a truly secret army containing in its ranks heads of political parties, high ranking officials, generals, magistrates, physicians, faculty professors, etc., all of them striving to bring about, in their own sphere, 'Opus Dei,' God's work, in reality the plans of the papacy."57&lt;br /&gt;They have often been known to join the religious persuasion which they wish to destroy. Having done this, they would manifest all of the destructive force at their hands to weaken and tear down their sworn enemy of "Protestantism." Paris again reports just such an event which took place in Scandinavia in the late 16th Century, "In 1574 Father Nicolai and other Jesuits were brought to the recently established school of technology where they became fervent Roman proselytizers, while officially assuming Lutheranism."58 Dr. Desanctis points out, "Despite all the persecution they (the Jesuits) have met with, they have not abandoned England, where there are a greater number of Jesuits than in Italy; there are Jesuits in all classes of society; in Parliament; among the English clergy; among the Protestant laity, even in the higher stations. I could not comprehend how a Jesuit could be a Protestant priest, or how a Protestant priest could be a Jesuit; but my Confessor silenced my scruples by telling me, omnia munda mundis, and that St. Paul became a Jew that he might save the Jews; it is no wonder therefore, if a Jesuit should feign himself a Protestant, for the conversion of Protestants."59&lt;br /&gt;Holy Murder&lt;br /&gt;Murder is not above the "means" which might be necessary to reach the desired "end." The General of the Jesuits will forgive any sins which are committed by the members of this Satanic order. In reference to the Jesuit General it is stated, "He also absolves the irregularity issuing, from bigamy, injuries done to others, murder, assassination ... as long as these wicked deeds were not publickly known and this cause of a scandal."60&lt;br /&gt;That the Jesuit priests have such liberties as murder is reflected in the following lengthy quote from Paris' book The Secret History of the Jesuits.&lt;br /&gt;"Amongst the most criminal jesuitic maxims, there is one which roused public indignation to the highest point and deserves to be examined; it is: 'A monk or priest is allowed to kill those who are ready to slander him or his community.'&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So the order gives itself the right to eliminate its adversaries and even those of its members who, having come out of it, are too talkative. This pearl is found in the Theology of Father L'Amy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is another case where this principle finds its application. For this same Jesuit was cynical enough to write: 'If a Father, yielding to temptation, abuses a woman and she publicizes what has happened, and because of it, dishonours him, this same Father can kill her to avoid disgrace!'"61&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In 1572, the Jesuits, with the help of Prince Henry III were responsible for the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre. At this infamous event, which took place on August 15, 1572, the Jesuits murdered the Huguenot (Protestant) leaders gathered in Paris for the wedding of Princess Margaret, a Roman Catholic, and Henry of Navarre, a Huguenot. The murders inspired Roman Catholics to slaughter thousands of Huguenot men, women, and children. Henry of Navarre was not killed but was forced to renounce Protestantism, although his renounciation was insincere, and he remained a Protestant until 1593. The number of victims in this Jesuit conspiracy is estimated to be at least 10,000.62 In 1589, when Henry III was no longer useful to the Roman Catholic Church, he was assassinated by a monk by the name of Jacques Clement.63 Clement was called an "angel" by the Jesuit priest, Camelet.64 Another Jesuit priest by the name of Guigard, who was eventually hanged, taught his students that Clement did nothing wrong. In fact, he voiced his regrets that Henry III had not been murdered earlier at the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre. He instructed them with lessons such as this: "Jacques Clement has done a meritor-ious act inspired by the Holy Spirit. If we can make war against the king, then let us do it; if we cannot make war against him, then let us put him to death ... we made a big mistake at the St. Bartholomew; we should have bled the royal vein."65&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Jesuits' murderous ways were not yet completed in the history of French Protestants! When Henry III was murdered, Henry of Navarre a Huguenot, came to power. A hope for Catholic rebellion never materialized, and Henry IV was allowed to reign. In 1592, an attempt was made to assassinate the Protestant king by a man named Barriere. Barriere admitted that he had been instructed to do so by a Father Varade, a Jesuit priest.66 In 1594, another attempt was made by Jean Chatel who had been taught by Jesuit teachers and had confessed to the Jesuits what he was about to do.67 It was at this time that Father Guigard, the Jesuit teacher previously mentioned, was seized and hanged for his connection with this plot.68&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In 1598, King Henry IV issued the Edict of Nantes, granting religious freedom to the Huguenots. They were allowed full civil rights and the right to hold public worship services in towns where they had congregations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This was the last straw! Henry IV had to be eliminated! This time the Jesuits would allow for more careful planning. Edmund Paris details the assassination of King Henry IV:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"On the 16th of May, 1610, on the eve of his campaign against Austria, he was murdered by Ravaillac who confessed having been inspired by the writing of Fathers Mariana and Suarez. These two sanctioned the murders of heretic "tyrants" or those insufficiently devoted to the Papacy's interests. The duke of Epemon, who made the king read a letter while the assassin was lying in wait, was a notorious friend of the Jesuits, and Michelet proved that they knew of this attempt. In fact, Ravaillac had confessed to the Jesuit Father d'Aubigny just before and, when the judges interrogated the priest, he merely replied that God had given him the gift to forget immediately what he heard in the confessional."69&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;THIS is the spirit of our enemy! THIS is the ruthlessness of the Roman Catholic Church against those who will not bow their knee to Rome! Would God use this church to preserve His Word?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wherever there is a conspiracy against God's people or God's Word, there seems always to be the shadow of a Jesuit priest near. Often they present themselves as seemingly innocent to the proceedings around them when, in fact, they are the driving force behind such plots against God's work.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is often said that you can tell a lot about a man by taking a close look at his enemies. If a man is disliked by Communists, then that shows that he is a non-Communist and considered dangerous to their cause. If a man is disliked by the Roman Catholic Church, then this shows that he is not useful in spreading the Roman Catholic dogma.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This same thing is true of the Bible. What did the Jesuits, the sworn enemy of truth, think of the Authorized Version?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Gunpowder Plot&lt;br /&gt;To show the hatred of the Roman Catholic Church against King James for initiating a translation which would not use the corrupt Latin Vulgate or the Jesuit Bible of 1582, we must quote from Gustavus Paine's book, The Men Behind the King James Version. The account recorded took place in 1605-1606.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The story is too involved to give detail here, but on October 26, the Lord Chamberlain, Monteagle, received an unsigned letter begging him to stay away from Parliament on the day it opened. He took the letter to Robert Cecil, who on November 1 showed it to the king at a midnight meeting. The King shrewdly surmised a good deal of what it meant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Monday, November 4, an agent of the royal party found in a cellar beneath the House of Lords a man named Guy Fawkes, disguised as a servant, beside piles of faggots, billets of wood, and masses of coal. The agent went away. Shortly Monteagle and one other came and talked, but gave no heed to Fawkes, who was still on guard until they were about to go. He told them he was a servant of Thomas Percy, a well-known papist. Still later, at midnight, soldiers found Fawkes booted and spurred and with a lantern outside the cellar door. He had taken few pains to conceal his actions. They dragged him into an alley, searched him, and found on him a tinderbox and a length of slow match. In a fury now, they moved the faggots, billets and coal and came upon barrel after barrel of powder, thirty-six barrels in all. Fawkes then confessed that he meant to blow up the House of Lords and the king.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On November 6, Percy, with others, rushed into an inn at Dunchurch, Warwickshire, with the news that the court was aware of their plan. By the 8th the whole attempt had dearly failed. When Parliament met a week after the stated day, the King, calm, gracious, and splendid told what had happened and then adjourned the meeting. At first Fawkes refused to name any except Percy who, with others, was killed in the course of a chase. In time he gave the names of all, who would have blown up the House of Lords 'at a clap.'&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Guy Fawkes was baptized at St. Michael le Belfrey, York, April 16, 1570, son of Edward Fawkes, a proctor and advocate in the church courts of York. The father died and the mother married a Papist. In 1603 Guy Fawkes went to Madrid to urge that Philip III invade England. Thus he was a confirmed traitor, though egged on and used by more astute plotters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Some of these men had been involved in the rising of the Earl of Esses. A number were former members of the Church of England. Most of them had some land and wealth. They were all highly disturbed beings, throwbacks, who meant to subvert the state and get rid of King James. Church and state, they were sure, must be at one, with fealty to the Pope.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For nearly a year, the plotters had been digging a tunnel from a distance, but had found the wall under the House of Lords nine feet thick. They had then got access to the cellar by renting a building. They had planned to kill the King, seize his children, stir up an open revolt with the aid from Spaniards in Flanders, put Princess Elizabeth on the throne, and marry her to a Papist. Though all but one, Sir Everard Digby, pleaded not guilty, the court, such as it was, condemned them all to death. That same week they were all hanged, four in St. Paul's churchyard where John Overall, the translator, could have looked on and four in the yard of the old palace.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Three months later came the trial of Henry Garnet, a Jesuit, thought to be head of the Jesuits in England. Brought up a Protestant, he knew of the plot but had shrunk in horror from it, though he left the chosen victims to their fate. The court condemned him also to die.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All this concerned the men at work on the Bible. At Garnet's hanging, May 3, in St. Paul's churchyard, John Overall, Dean of St. Paul's took time off from his translating to be present. Very gravely and Christ-ianily he and the Dean of Winchester urged upon Garnet 'a true and lively faith to God-ward,' a free and plain statement to the world of his offense; and if any further treason lay in his knowledge, he was begged to unburden his conscience and show a sorrow and destination of it. Garnet, firm in his beliefs, desired them not to trouble him. So after the men assigned to the gruesome duty had hanged, drawn, and quartered the victim Dean Overall returned to St. Paul's and his Bible task."70&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thus the "Gunpowder Plot" failed. As usual, where there was treachery there was a Jesuit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Did the failure of this plan stop the Jesuits? Of course not. Garnet had allowed this drastic plan to be carried out too soon. He had forgotten the Jesuit rule to act a little at a time "surtout, pas trop de zele" (above all, not too much zeal).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A New Plan&lt;br /&gt;Let it be remembered, Jesuits do not give up. They would have to bide their time. They would once again resort to undercover activities as they had so many times before. Their task would be a difficult one, yet for the unfaltering Jesuits, not impossible. They would have to discredit the Reformation. They would have to dislodge the Universal Greek Text from the firm position it held in the minds and hearts of English scholarship. They would have to "wean" Protestantism back into the fold of Rome. To do this they would use the same plan as they had in similar situations: captivate the minds of scholarship.&lt;br /&gt;Men have long been worshippers of education. If an educator makes a claim, the "common" people will follow, because they have convinced themselves that anyone with that much education can't be wrong.&lt;br /&gt;Evolution has been accepted as a fact by the average American because educators claim that it is true. The fact that they can produce no evidence to substantiate their theory is incidental. Education says it is so!&lt;br /&gt;The Jesuits' task was to entice Protestant scholarship back to Rome. They knew that they could not wean the leaders of Protestantism back into Rome as long as the stubborn "heretics" clung to the pure text of the Reformers. This Bible would have to be replaced with one which contained the pro-Roman Catholic readings of Jerome's Vulgate and the Jesuit translation of 1582. It would be necessary to "educate" the Protestant scholars to believe that their Reformation Text was unreliable and that their Authorized Version was "not scholarly." Once thus programmed, the egotistical scholars would spontaneously attack their own Bible and believe that they were helping God.&lt;br /&gt;The most important objective to be realized would be to replace the Bible as the final authority.&lt;br /&gt;The Authorized Version had become a mightier foe than Rome had anticipated as Dr. McClure points out: "The printing of the English Bible has proved to be by far the mightiest barrier ever reared to repel the advance of Popery, and to damage all the resources of the Papacy. Originally intended for the five or six millions who dwelt within the narrow limits of the British Islands, it at once formed and fixed their language, till then unsettled; and has since gone with that language to the isles and shores of every sea."&lt;br /&gt;The Dreaded Happening&lt;br /&gt;What the Roman Catholics had always dreaded had come to pass. The Word of God was translated from the true text into the clearest form of the common language, English. Protestants had long refuted and neutralized Roman Catholicism by the phrase, "The Bible says so." The Roman Catholic Church had been built on about 10% twisted Scripture and 90% superstition. Where men were ignorant, it could rule by playing on their fears. But, when the "ignorant and unlearned" people received Christ as personal Saviour and clung faithfully to the King James Bible, they were not only immovable but could easily refute any heresy, be it Catholic or otherwise.&lt;br /&gt;Aiding The Enemy&lt;br /&gt;The job of the Jesuits would be aided by the natural process of time. Every major religious persuasion follows a natural pattern which is nearly impossible to avoid. They begin in the form of a revival, not a week long revival meeting, but a spiritual awakening which leads its followers away from the world system and into Bible literalism. The Reformation is a good example. People drew nearer to the Bible, believed it literally, and the end result was a revival which swept Europe and drew people out of the Roman Catholic system.&lt;br /&gt;The next step is education. The infant Reformation had nowhere to send its converts to learn the Bible. It certainly could not allow them to return to the Roman school of philosophy for their education. So the second step is to build your own schools and train your own preachers and teachers.&lt;br /&gt;The third step is culture. Once a movement has established itself, it forms its own culture. This process takes from 50 to 100 years. After this period of time, the movement has proved to the world that it is not a "fly by night" outfit but is a force to be reckoned with. This was true of Lutheranism, as it is now true of Fundamentalism.&lt;br /&gt;Fifty years ago, a Fundamentalist preacher was considered a backwoods "hick" with no education and was able to preach nothing more than "hell, fire, and damnation." Today, the world has awakened to the fact that Fundamentalism is a powerful force. Fundamental churches are found to be the largest and fastest growing in the country. Television and magazines are producing special stories concerning the Fundamental movement. The election of 1980 showed the amount of influence that Fundamentalism could have. Fundamentalism has proven that it is here to stay.&lt;br /&gt;This acceptance produces a kind of "home-grown" arrogance. This is not a derogatory comment, but is true.&lt;br /&gt;When the preachers of the Reformation graduated from basements and dungeons to the pulpits of the largest, fastest growing churches in Europe, they realized that they had fought their way to victory. As they saw their colleges grow and multiply, they prided themselves in the job they had done. But the new-found ease of life began to make a subtle change. They found themselves beginning to appreciate the "finer" things of life. A pastor who had been satisfied in the early days of the Reformation with a basement and one candle for light to preach by, twenty-five years later found himself in a fine, clean, functional building. As his congregation grew and space was needed, the church built bigger buildings, but the new buildings passed from functional simplicity to a "touch of elegance." The chandeliers became more ornate. The ceiling became higher. The pews were more comfortable. The windows saw the use of stained glass, a Roman Catholic custom. The pastor found social acceptance in the community. Each succeeding building was "bigger and better" with more elaborate masonry. The preachers and people began to find time to "appreciate" the arts and sciences. The Christians soon had a culture which was separate from but parallel to that of the world. This left the door open for the next and final step, apostasy.&lt;br /&gt;The preachers became "clergy." Their separated lives and Biblical education led to Phariseeism. Their colleges expanded from just training ministers to covering a wider spectrum of occupations. Basic Bible courses were supplemented by a study of "the arts."&lt;br /&gt;Revival is from God. Education is necessary to the training of God's ministers, but culture is a product that appeals to the flesh. Once the flesh is allowed to offer its preferences, apostasy sets in. Standards become a little more lax. College professors are hired according to their academic abilities first and the spiritual convictions second. Statements like "We must have the best" and "I want to be first-class" are used to comfort the fears of anyone who feels that the churches and schools seem a little worldly. Of course, a school administrator might find himself thinking, "The average Christian doesn't understand our minute changes. They aren't educated like we are."&lt;br /&gt;There suddenly appears a Christian with an open Bible, who points out Scripture which may condemn the new found "culture" of a church or school. The school amazingly finds itself in the same position as the Roman Catholic Church, refuted by an ignorant Christian who believes the Bible. Which is to be the final authority, the school or the Bible? Time after time, education has found that it has come too far to turn back. "We are!" came the answer from Oxford, Cambridge, and Westminister in England. "We are!" came the answer from Harvard, Princeton, and Yale in America. Education has conceived culture and given birth to apostasy!&lt;br /&gt;Ripe for Conquest&lt;br /&gt;England in the early 1800's was ripe for apostasy. The Reformation had come a long way since Luther nailed his theses on the door of Wittenburg. It had traversed Europe with the truth, leaving in its wake churches and schools that represented the pure text of Scripture. The educational foundation had been laid, upon which culture was built. Gone were the attempts to blow up Parliament. Gone was the fear of ending up like Tyndale for believing "the Book." Gone was the reign of terror inflicted by "bloody" Mary. The churches built around the Authorized Version were rich and prosperous. The colleges, from their meager beginnings, had become great universities, pressing on with higher education. There were a few "common" people who still feared Rome, but the "educators" knew that their fears were "unfounded." England was ripe for a transfer of authority from the Bible to education, and Rome was willing to supply the education. The absolute reign of the Authorized Version would soon end.&lt;br /&gt;Operation "Undermine"&lt;br /&gt;The Authorized Version had withstood countless attacks, but it would now be subject to a systematic campaign to exhalt several authorities to a position equal to it. These perverted "authorities" would then join forces to portray the Authorized Version as weak, unreliable, inaccurate, outmoded, and generally untrustworthy. Once the Authorized Version had been successfully dethroned, education would be free to exalt whatever authority it desired to. The Roman Catholic Church, of course, would be close at hand to see to it that the authority which was to be exalted would be in agreement with its own corrupt Latin Vulgate.&lt;br /&gt;The authorities to be exalted as equal with the Authorized Version came from several different quarters, but all with the same intent. Replace the Universal Text of the Authorized Version with the Local Text of Alexandria, Egypt.&lt;br /&gt;Science "Falsely So-Called"&lt;br /&gt;One of the authorities which would be used to discredit the Authorized Version was "textual criticism."&lt;br /&gt;Textual criticism is known as a "science." By being called a science, it will be accepted by the educated mind. It is a process which looks at the Bible as it would look at the uninspired writings of any secular writer. This one fact alone means that the power of God to preserve His Word is ignored in favor of the naturalistic method of evaluating the "chance" of God's Word being preserved. Textual criticism allows God to "inspire" His originals, but seeks to replace God as the active agent in preserving His Word.&lt;br /&gt;Earlier we established that the Bible was a spiritual book, that God was active in its conception, and that it would be reasonable to assume that God could be just as active in its preservation.&lt;br /&gt;One might ask at this point if textual criticism could not be the method which God used to preserve His Words? The answer is unequivocably, "No." Here are the reasons why:&lt;br /&gt;Textual critics look at the Bible today through the same eyes as the Egyptian scribes did who perverted the Universal Text to construct the Local Text centuries ago. Those well-educated scribes thought that the Bible was subject to them instead of them being subject to the Bible. This outlook allowed them to eliminate the power of God from their minds and make whatever changes they deemed necessary to reach a conclusion which seemed logical to them. They were the Holy Spirit in their minds!&lt;br /&gt;Today textual critics do the same, in that, before they ever start their work, they are convinced that God cannot preserve His Word without their assistance. Scholars today believe that God inspired words but preserved thoughts.&lt;br /&gt;Another reason why textual criticism could not be the method God used to preserve His Word is that it comes from Rome.&lt;br /&gt;The Catholic Encyclopedia states, "A French priest, Richard Simon (1638-1712), was the first who subjected the general questions concerning the Bible to a treatment which was at once comprehensive in scope and scientific in method. Simon is the forerunner of modern Biblical criticism ... The use of internal evidence by which Simon arrived at it entitles him to be called the father of Biblical criticism"72&lt;br /&gt;The same source also mentions the Catholic scholar Jean Astruc:&lt;br /&gt;"In 1753 Jean Astruc, a French Catholic physician of considerable note published a little book, Conjectures sur les memoires originaux dont il parait que Moise s'est servi pour composer le livre de la Genese, in which he conjectured, from the alternating use of two names of God in the Hebrew Genesis, that Moses had incorporated therein two pre-existing documents, one of which employed Elohim and the other Jehovah. The idea attracted little attention till it was taken up by a German scholar, who, however, claims to have made the discovery independently. This was Johann Gottfried Eichhorn ... Eichhorn greatly developed Astruc's hypothesis."73&lt;br /&gt;The same source also speaks of yet another Roman Catholic infidel:&lt;br /&gt;"Yet, it was a Catholic priest of Scottish origin, Alexander Geddes (1737-1802), who broached a theory of the origin of the Five Books (to which he attached Joshua) exceeding in boldness either Simon's or Eichhorn's. This was the well-known 'Fragment' hypothesis, which reduced the Pentateuch to a collection of fragmentary sections partly of Mosaic origin, but put together in the reign of Solomon. Geddes' opinion was introduced into Germany in 1805 by Vater."74&lt;br /&gt;Dr. Benjamin Wilkenson records how the naturalistic, unsaved Roman Catholic scholars judged in favor of the perverted Egyptian manuscripts: "Some of the earliest critics in the field of collecting variant readings of the New Testament Greek were Mill and Bengel. We have Dr. Kenrick, Catholic Bishop of Philadelphia in 1849, as authority that they and others had examined these manuscripts recently exalted as superior, such as the Vaticanus, Alexandrinus, Beza, and Ephraem, and had pronounced in favor of the Vulgate, the Catholic Bible."75&lt;br /&gt;Stop and think! Naturalistic as opposed to spiritual. Unsaved as opposed to saved. Roman Catholic as opposed to Biblical. These men conceived and developed theories which attacked the reliability of Scripture and judged in favor of the perverted Egyptian manuscripts.&lt;br /&gt;Are these men and methods worthy of fellowship? Would a perfect and righteous God use such a hodgepodge of infidelity to preserve His hallowed Words? Some may say that textual criticism is good if carried on by good, godly Christian men. This cannot be true. The "mass" is a Roman Catholic invention contrived to prevent people from knowing the truth. Would the mass be "good" if performed by good, Bible-believing scholars? Of course not! Elisha took poison and made it fit to eat, (II Kings 4:38-41). We cannot! Neither can we take a method instigated by the Roman Catholic Church in order to overthrow the Bible and filled with the poison of Romanism and miraculously make it fit to use! Textual criticism is a "science" (falsely so-called - I Timothy 6:20) whose authority we cannot accept in place of the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;The Greek Game&lt;br /&gt;Another authority by which to judge and down-grade the absolute authority of the Authorized Version is to change the meaning of the translation and the words used in Scripture.&lt;br /&gt;First the student is taught that he must not accept a word as it is in the Authorized Version. He is told to study the Greek or Hebrew words to see if there is another way the word could be translated. The student, with the purest of motives, proceeds to a lexicon or a Greek or Hebrew dictionary and discovers to His horror that the translators of the Authorized Version have translated the word improperly! In truth, the exact opposite has happened. The lexicon and/or dictionary has defined the word improperly! The poor, naive, well-meaning student does not know it, but he has been "headed off at the pass."&lt;br /&gt;Years before this poor student ever turned the first page of his lexicon, Roman Catholics provided the pages he would turn! Let me explain. If the student can be taught to doubt the accuracy of the translation of any given word in the Bible, then we will turn to a lexicon or dictionary to find the "'true" meaning. He does not realize it, but in doing this, he removes the Bible from its position as final authority and bestows that honor upon an uninspired lexicon or dictionary. All this leaves Satan to do, is to provide that student with a lexicon or dictionary which reads the way he (Satan) wants it to! This is a subtle and dangerous precedent. Most often, it is taught in complete, innocent sincerity.&lt;br /&gt;This is much like the phrase used to explain the Communist's takeover of many countries which were once thriving with many missionaries: "The missionaries taught us to read, but the Communists gave us the books." (The Communists do not argue about the proper translation of Marx.)&lt;br /&gt;Many unsuspecting colleges teach their students to accept the lexicon or dictionary as an authority above the Bible, but the lexicons and dictionaries are provided by the infidels.&lt;br /&gt;John R. Rice points out the result of such "authority switching" while discussing Isaiah 7:14 in the Revised Standard Version: "The most active opposition to the Revised Standard Version has been about changing the translation of Isaiah 7:14 from, 'Behold, a virgin shall conceive,' to 'Behold, a young woman shall conceive and bear a son.' Dr. Luther Weigle, chairman of the translators, said that in the Hebrew English lexicon the word 'alma' means simply 'young woman,' not necessarily 'virgin' and he said that the word for 'virgin' in the Hebrew is 'bethulah.'" He did not tell you, however, that the lexicon he uses was prepared by unbelieving critics.&lt;br /&gt;Gensenius, the German orientalist and biblical critic, is described in the Encyclopedia Britannica in these words:&lt;br /&gt;"To Gensenius, who was an exceptionally popular teacher, belongs in a large measure the credit of having freed Semitic philosophy from theological and religious prepossession, and of inaugurating the strictly scientific (and comparative) method.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;His chief work, Hebraisches u. Chaldais- ches Handworterbuch (1810-1812), has passed through several editions (Eng. ed.: Francis Brown, S.R. Driver and Charles A. Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament, 1907).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gensenius, a notorious liberal, specialized in changing the theological terminology of the Bible into that of liberals. Brown, Driver, and Briggs, translators of the lexicon in English were, all three of them, radical liberals, and two of them were tried in the Presbyterian church for outrageous infidelity."76&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wilkenson reports that two of the infamous Roman Catholic scholars previously mentioned also entered into the practice of providing definitive works. "Simon and Eichhorn were co-authors of a Hebrew Dictionary."77&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such infidelic works are accepted because they are produced by "great scholars." They are then used by good, godly men who do not realize the price of bowing to unbelieving scholarship.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Griesbach&lt;br /&gt;Another important step in subtlety removing the authority of the Authorized Version is to exalt the unreliable MSS of the Local Text of Egypt. This will be commented on later. Let it suffice for now to reveal the man who laid the groundwork for just such a move. His name was J.J. Griesbach (1745-1812).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Griesbach divided the extant MSS into three groups. One was called the "Constantinopolitan" family which is our Universal Text. The other two were known as "Western" and "Alexandrian."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As can be expected, Griesbach was not a Bible believer. In fact, he stated, "The New Testament abounds in more glosses, additions, and interpolations purposely introduced than any other book."78 He was also antagonostic to any verse which taught the fundamental doctrines of the Christian faith. Whenever possible he devised means to cast doubt on such passages. He said, "the most suspicious reading of all, is the one that yields a sense favorable to the nourishment of piety (especially monastic piety). When there are many variant readings in one place, that reading which more than the others manifestly favors the dogmas of the orthodox is deservedly regarded as suspicious."79&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is strange indeed that Dr. Griesbach should expect orthodox Christians to manipulate the book which they truly believe to be from God, in order to teach Christianity more fervently. He never mentioned any apprehension that heretics might delete and alter doctrinal passages. What kind of scholarship is it that naturally suspects born-again Christians of an act bordering on sacrilege, but never doubts the integrity of infidels? Is this God's method?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Whatever it was that possessed Griesbach to suspect Christians of such criminal acts also possessed two of his followers. Hill explains:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Westcott and Hort professed to 'venerate' the name of Griesbach above that of every other textual critic of the New Testament. Like Griesbach they believed that the orthodox Christian scribes had altered the New Testament manuscripts in the interest of orthodoxy. Hence like Griesbach, they ruled out in advance any possibility of the providential preservation of the New Testament text through the usage of believers. But at the same time they were very zealous to deny that heretics had made any intentional changes in the New Testament text. 'It will not be out of place,' they wrote, 'to add here a distinct expression of our belief that even among the numerous unquestionably spur-ious readings of the New Testament, there are no signs of deliberate falsification of the text for dogmatic purposes.' The effect of this one-sided theory was to condemn the text found in the majority of the New Testament manuscripts and exonerate that of B and Aleph."80&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thus the Local Text, supported by the Roman Catholic Church, became an authority equal to or higher than the Universal Text of the Authorized Version in spite of the many doctrinal changes. After all, Griesbach, Westcott, and Hort had already established that heretics never falsify Scripture--only Christians do!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As the infidelity of men such as this is accepted as authorative, Christians begin to look to their Bible with more and more skepticism. What more could Satan desire?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Are these men to be blamed for their failure to accept the Bible as infallible, or have they been unsuspecting dupes of a plan much bigger and far more serious than they could have ever suspected? Let us see.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Puppeteer&lt;br /&gt;One man who became greatly responsible for the fall of England to a sympathetic acceptance of Roman Catholic ideas was Cardinal Wiseman (1802-1865).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wiseman was the prime mover in installing the Roman Catholic Church back on the shore of England. He was born and raised in England. He went to Rome to study under Cardinal Mai, the editor of the Vatican Manuscript.&lt;br /&gt;Wiseman had a desire to see England return to the fold at Rome. One of the major obstacles to this was the supremacy which the Authorized Version held there. Where the Authorized Version prevails, Rome cannot.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Puppets&lt;br /&gt;While in Rome, he was visited by several Neo-Protestants. He was instrumental in "weaning" these men back into subjection to the Pope. One of his visitors was William Gladstone (1809-1898),who was to become prime minister of England. He was a man known for his change from being a Conservative to a Liberal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another visitor was Anglican Archbishop Trench, who returned to England to promote a revision of the Authorized Version and even joined the Revision Committee of 1871.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Still another was John Henry Newman. Newman was the brilliant English churchman who was a leader of Oxford University and the English clergy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Newman was close friends with Herrell Froude. Froude, Wilkenson tells us, was the son of a High Churchman, "who loathed Protestantism, denounced the Evangelicals, and brought up his sons to do the same."81&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These two, Newman and Froude, joined affinity with John Keble. Keble, like Froude, was of High Church background. He was strongly anti-Protestant and anti-Evangelical.82&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Newman and Froude visited Wiseman in Rome in 1833. Having been taken in by the beautiful architecture of Rome's cathedrals and the solemn grandeur of the high masses, the two Oxford professors inquired of Wiseman as to what terms the Roman Catholic Church would require to accept the Church of England back into the Roman Church. Wiseman's reply was cold and clear: The Church of England must accept the Council of Trent. At this, Newman left Rome stating, "I have a work to do in England," a work indeed, in which he, Froude, Keble, and Edward Pusey joined forces to swing England back to Rome and to remove their primary adversary, the hated King James Bible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Newman, brilliant man that he was, provided the strong intellectual leadership needed. Pusey was the moralist, and Keble spoke through the delicate words of the poet and captivated the hearts and minds of many an unsuspecting young scholar. Any who lacked a strong stand on Bible principles would be easy prey for these apostates.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Newman, in fact, was so taken in by the spell of Rome that he, in 1845, left the Church of England and formally joined the Roman Catholic Church, following a similar apostate, named Ward, who had written a book teaching the worship of Mary and "mental reservation." Mental reservation is the act, condoned by the Roman Catholic Church, of lying to keep from revealing your ties to Rome.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wilkenson records Newman's betrayal:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Public sentiment was again aroused to intensity in 1845 when Ward, an outstanding Tractarian, published His book which taught the most offensive Roman views, Mariolatry, and mental reservation in subscribing to the Thirty-nine Articles. When Oxford degraded him from his university rights, he went over in September to the Church of Rome. It became very evident that Newman soon would follow. On the night of October 8 Father Dominic, of the Italian Passionists, arrived at Newman's quarters in a downpouring rain. After being received, he was standing before the fire drying his wet garments. He turned around to see Newman prostrate at his feet, begging his blessing, and asking him to hear his confession. Thus the author of Lead Kindly Light passed over to Rome, and within one year 150 clergyman and eminent laymen also had joined the Catholic Church."83&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Where was Wiseman through all of this? He was naturally close at hand. In 1836, three years following Newman and Froude's visit, he had moved to Ireland to supervise the Oxford Movement through his paper, the "Dublin Review." Wiseman was described as, "a textual critic of the first rank, and assisted by the information seemingly passed on to him from the Jesuits, he was able to finish the facts well calculated to combat confidence in the Protestant Bible." 84 (Emphasis mine.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;England had graduated from "revival" to "education," and her "education" had developed into her own unique "culture." From there, the Roman Catholic Church was willing to supply the apostasy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Where We Stand&lt;br /&gt;Today in colleges and churches across America and around the world, truly good, godly men who love the Lord Jesus and sincerely desire to serve Him, are unsuspectingly propagating the Roman Catholic method of textual criticism. The result is that Christian soldiers who go out to fight Rome, either with a perfect Bible which they have been taught to doubt, or else an unreliable translation of the Rome-supported Local Text, which is worthy of all suspicion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Education in America has come to the place of either having to swallow its pride, admit it has been wrong, and return to the true Bible; or else make another more vehement attack on the Authorized Bible in hopes of finally silencing it and its supporters, in the hope of hiding its mistake. Christians be warned! The Revised Version did not ring the death note for the King James Bible. It rang the death note for England!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All of the translations before and after 1881 which were going to replace the Authorized Version lie silently in the "grave" right now. Those which do not, shall soon join their ranks in the halls of the "improved," "thoroughly reliable," "truly accurate," and "starters of a new tradition," dead. They have failed to start one revival. They have failed to induce Christians back to reading their Bibles, and have only succeeded in casting doubt on the true Word of God. The question is, can we repair the damage already done and proceed from here? The answer is YES!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chapter 8:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Westcott and Hort&lt;br /&gt;Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1903) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) have been highly controversial figures in biblical history.&lt;br /&gt;On one side, their supporters have heralded them as great men of God, having greatly advanced the search for the original Greek text.&lt;br /&gt;On the other side, their opponents have leveled charges of heresy, infidelity, apostasy, and many others, claiming that they are guilty of wreaking great damage on the true text of Scripture.&lt;br /&gt;I have no desire to "sling mud" nor a desire to hide facts.&lt;br /&gt;I believe it is essential at this time that we examine what we know about these men and their theories concerning the text of the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;I long sought for copies of the books about their lives. These are The Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westeott, by his son, Arthur, and The Life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, written by his son.&lt;br /&gt;After literally months of trying, I was able to acquire copies of them both for study. Most of the material in this section will be directly from these sources so as to prevent it from being secondhand.&lt;br /&gt;We cannot blindly accept the finding of any scholar without investigating what his beliefs are concerning the Bible and its doctrines. Scholarship alone makes for an inadequate and dangerous authority, therefore we are forced to scrutinize these men's lives.&lt;br /&gt;A Monumental Switch&lt;br /&gt;Westcott and Hort were responsible for the greatest feat in textual criticism. They were responsible for replacing the Universal Text of the Authorized Version with the Local Text of Egypt and the Roman Catholic Church. Both Wescott and Hort were known to have resented the pre-eminence given to the Authorized Version and its underlying Greek Text. They had been deceived into believing that the Roman Catholic manuscripts, Vaticanus and Aleph, were better because they were "older." This they believed, even though Hort admitted that the Antiochian or Universal Text was equal in antiquity. "The fundamental text of the late extant Greek MSS generally is beyond all question identical with the dominant Antiochian or Graeco-Syrian Text of the second half of the Fourth Century."85&lt;br /&gt;Vicious Prejudice&lt;br /&gt;In spite of the fact that the readings of the Universal Text were found to be as old, or older, Westcott and Hort still sought to dislodge it from its place of high standing in biblical history. Hort occasionally let his emotions show, "I had no idea till the last few weeks of the importance of text, having read so little Greek Testament, and dragged on with the villainous Textus Receptus ... Think of the vile Textus Receptus leaning entirely on late MSS; it is a blessing there are such early ones."86&lt;br /&gt;Westcott and Hort built their own Greek text based primarily on a few uncial MSS of the Local Text. It has been stated earlier that these perverted MSS do not even agree among themselves. The ironic thing is that Westcott and Hort knew this when they formed their text!&lt;br /&gt;Burgon exposed Dr. Hort's confession, "Even Hort had occasion to notice an instance of the concordia discourse." Commenting on the four places in Mark's gospel (14:30, 68, 72, a, b) where the cock's crowing is mentioned said, "The confusion of attestation introduced by these several cross currents of change is so great that of the seven principal MSS, Aleph, A, B, C, D, L, no two have the same text in all four places."87&lt;br /&gt;A Shocking Revelation&lt;br /&gt;That these men should lend their influence to a family of MSS which have a history of attacking and diluting the major doctrines of the Bible, should not come as a surprise. Oddly enough, neither man believed that the Bible should be treated any differently than the writings of the lost histor-ians and philosophers!&lt;br /&gt;Hort wrote, "For ourselves, we dare not introduce considerations which could not reasonably be applied to other ancient texts, supposing them to have documentary attestation of equal amount, variety and antiquity."88&lt;br /&gt;He also states, "In the New Testament, as in almost all prose writings which have been much copied, corruptions by interpolation are many times more numerous than corruptions by omission." (Emphasis mine.)89&lt;br /&gt;We must consider these things for a moment. How can God use men who do not believe that His Book is any different than Shakespeare, Plato, or Dickens? It is a fundamental belief that the Bible is different from all other writings. Why did these men not believe so?&lt;br /&gt;Blatant Disbelief&lt;br /&gt;Their skepticism does, in fact, go even deeper. They have both become famous for being able to deny scriptural truth and still be upheld by fundamental Christianity as biblical authorities! Both Westcott and Hort failed to accept the basic Bible doctrines which we hold so dear and vital to our fundamental faith.&lt;br /&gt;Hort denies the reality of Eden: "I am inclined to think that no such state as 'Eden'(I mean the popular notion) ever existed, and that Adam's fall in no degree differed from the fall of each of his descendants, as Coleridge justly argues."90&lt;br /&gt;Furthermore, he took sides with the apostate authors of "Essays and Reviews."&lt;br /&gt;Hort writes to Rev. Rowland Williams, October 21, 1858, "Further I agree with them [Authors of "Essays and Reviews"] in condemning many leading specific doctrines of the popular theology ... Evangelicals seem to me perverted rather than untrue. There are, I fear, still more serious differences between us on the subject of authority, and especially the authority of the Bible."91&lt;br /&gt;We must also confront Hort's disbelief that the Bible was infallible: "If you make a decided conviction of the absolute infallibility of the N.T. practically a sine qua non for co-operation, I fear I could not join you." He also stated:&lt;br /&gt;"As I was writing the last words a note came from Westcott. He too mentions having had fears, which he now pronounces 'groundless,' on the strength of our last conversation, in which he discovered that I did 'recognize' 'Providente' in biblical writings. Most strongly I recognize it; but I am not prepared to say that it necessarily involves absolute infallibility. So I still await judgment."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And further commented to a colleague:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"But I am not able to go as far as you in asserting the absolute infallibility of a canonical writing."92&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Strange Bedfellows&lt;br /&gt;Though unimpressed with the evangelicals of his day, Hort had great admiration for Charles Darwin! To his colleague, B.F. Westcott, he wrote excitedly: "...Have you read Darwin? How I should like to talk with you about it! In spite of difficulties, I am inclined to think it unanswerable. In any case it is a treat to read such a book."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And to John Ellerton he writes: "But the book which has most engaged me is Darwin. Whatever may be thought of it, it is a book that one is proud to be contemporary with ... My feeling is strong that the theory is unanswerable. If so, it opens up a new period."93&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dr. Hort was also an adherent to the teaching of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. His son writes: "In undergraduate days, if not before, he came under the spell of Coleridge."94&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Coleridge was the college drop-out whose drug addiction is an historical fact. "The opium habit, begun earlier to deaden the pain of rheumatism, grew stronger. After vainly trying in Malta and Italy to break away from opium, Coleridge came back to England in 1806."95&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of Coleridge's famous works is Aids to Reflection. "Its chief aim is to harmonize formal Christianity with Coleridge's variety of transcendental philosophy. He also did much to introduce Immanual Kant and other German philosophers to English readers."96&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This man, Coleridge, had a great influence on the two scholars from Cambridge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Forsaking Colossians 2:8&lt;br /&gt;Hort was also a lover of Greek philosophy. In writing to Mr. A. MacMillian, he stated: "You seem to make (Greek) philosophy worthless for those who have received the Christian revelation. To me, though in a hazy way, it seems full of precious truth of which I find nothing, and should be very much astonished and perplexed to find anything in revelation."97&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lost in the Forest&lt;br /&gt;In some cases Hort seemed to wander in the woods. In others he can only be described as utterly "lost in the forest." Take, for example, his views on fundamental Bible truths.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hort's "Devil"&lt;br /&gt;Concerning existence of a personal devil he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The discussion which immediately precedes these four lines naturally leads to another enigma most intimately connected with that of everlasting penalties, namely that of the personality of the devil." It was Coleridge who some three years ago first raised any doubts in my mind on the subject - doubts which have never yet been at all set at rest, one way or the other. You yourself are very cautious in your language.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Now if there be a devil, he cannot merely bear a corrupted and marred image of God; he must be wholly evil, his name evil, his every energy and act evil. Would it not be a violation of the divine attributes for the Word to be actively the support of such a nature as that?"98&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hort's "Hell"&lt;br /&gt;Rev. Hort also shrunk from the belief in a literal, eternal "hell."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I think Maurice's letter to me sufficiently showed that we have no sure knowledge respecting the duration of future punishment, and that the word 'eternal' has a far higher meaning than the merely material one of excessively long duration; extinction always grates against my mind as something impossible."99&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Certainly in my case it proceeds from no personal dread; when I have been living most godlessly, I have never been able to frighten myself with visions of a distant future, even while I 'held' the doctrine."100&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hort's "Purgatory'&lt;br /&gt;Although the idea of a literal devil and a literal hell found no place in Hort's educated mind, he was a very real believer in the fictious Roman Catholic doctrine of "purgatory." To Rev. John Ellerton he wrote in 1854:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I agree with you in thinking it a pity that Maurice verbally repudiates purgatory, but I fully and unwaveringly agree with him in the three cardinal points of the controversy: (1) that eternity is independent of duration; (2) that the power of repentance is not limited to this life; (3) that it is not revealed whether or not all will ultimately repent. The modern denial of the second has, I suppose, had more to do with the despiritualizing of theology then almost anything that could be named."101&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also while advising a young student he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The idea of purgation, of cleansing as by fire, seems to me inseparable from what the Bible teaches us of the Divine chastisements; and, though little is directly said resecting the future state, it seems to me incredible that the Divine chastisements should in this respect change their character when this visible life is ended.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I do not hold it contradictory to the Article to think that the condemned doctrine has not been wholly injurious, inasmuch as it has kept alive some sort of belief in a great and important truth."102&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thus we see that Dr. Hort's opinions were certainly not inhibited by orthodoxy. Yet his wayward ways do not end here. For, as his own writings display, Dr. Hort fell short in several other fundamental areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hort's "Atonement"&lt;br /&gt;There was also his rejection of Christ's atoning death for the sins of all mankind.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The fact is, I do not see how God's justice can be satisfied without every man's suffering in his own person the full penalty for his sins."103&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, Hort considered the teachings of Christ's atonement as heresy!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Certainly nothing can be more unscriptural than the modern limiting of Christ's bearing our sins and sufferings to His death; but indeed that is only one aspect of an almost universal heresy."104&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fact is, that Hort believed Satan more worthy of accepting Christ's payment for sins than God.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I confess I have no repugnance to the primitive doctrine of a ransom paid to Satan, though neither am I prepared to give full assent to it. But I can see no other possible form in which the doctrine of a ransom is at all tenable; anything is better than the notion of a ransom paid to the Father."105&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hort's "Baptism"&lt;br /&gt;Dr. Hort also believed that the Roman Catholic teaching of "baptismal regeneration" was more correct than the "evangelical" teaching.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"...at the same time in language stating that we maintain 'Baptismal Regeneration' as the most important of doctrines ... the pure 'Romish' view seems to me nearer, and more likely to lead to, the truth than the Evangelical."106&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He also states that, "Baptism assures us that we are children of God, members of Christ and His body, and heirs of the heavenly kingdom."107&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, Hort's heretical view of baptism probably cost his own son his eternal soul, as we find Hort assuring his eldest son, Arthur, that his infant baptism was his salvation:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"You were not only born into the world of men. You were also born of Christian parents in a Christian land. While yet an infant you were claimed for God by being made in Baptism an unconscious member of His Church, the great Divine Society which has lived on unceasingly from the Apostles' time till now. You have been surrounded by Christian influences; taught to lift up your eyes to the Father in heaven as your own Father; to feel yourself in a wonderful sense a member or part of Christ, united to Him by strange invisible bonds; to know that you have as your birthright a share in the kingdom of heaven."108&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hort's Twisted Belief&lt;br /&gt;Along with Hort's unregenerated misconceptions of basic Bible truths, there were his quirkish and sometimes quackish personal beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One such example is his hatred for democracy, as he asserts in a letter to Rev. Westcott dated April 28, 1865:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"...I dare not prophesy about America, but I cannot say that I see much as yet to soften my deep hatred of democracy in all its forms."109&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In fact, Hort's hope, during the years of the American Civil War, was that the South would win. This desire was fostered by the hope that such a victory would destroy both countries to eliminate America's threat to England's domination of the world. His own words betray this in a letter which he wrote to Rev. John Ellerton in September of 1862:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I care more for England and for Europe than for America, how much more than for all the niggers in the world! And I contend that the highest morality requires me to do so. Some thirty years ago Niebuhr wrote to this effect: 'Whatever people may say to the contrary, the American empire is standing menace to the whole civilization of Europe and sooner or later one or the other must perish.' Every year has, I think, brought fresh proof of the entire truth of these words. American doctrine (only too well echoed from Europe itself, though felt to be at variance with the institutions of Europe) destroys the root of everything vitally precious which man has by painful growth been learning from the earliest times till now, and tends only to reduce us to the gorilla state. The American empire seems to me mainly an embodiment of American doctrine, its leading principle being lawless force. Surely, if ever Babylon or Rome were rightly cursed it cannot be wrong to desire and pray from the bottom of one's heart that the American Union may be shivered to pieces.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I do not for a moment forget what slavery is, or the frightful effects which Olmsted has shown it to be producing on white society in the South; but I hate it much more for its influence on the whites than on the niggers themselves. The refusal of education to them is abominable; how far they are capable of being ennobled by it is not clear. As yet everywhere (not in slavery only) they have surely shown themselves only as an immeasurably inferior race, just human and no more, their religion frothy and sensuous, their highest virtues, those of a good Newfoundland dog."110&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hort also had no respect for prominent Americans, be they politician or preacher. Concerning President Abraham Lincoln he wrote: "I cannot see that he has shown any special virtues or statesmanlike capacities."111 The great preacher D.L. Moody impressed him as follows:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Think of my going with Gray yesterday afternoon to hear 'Moody and Sankey' at the Haymarket. I am very glad to have been, but should not care to go again. All was much as I expected, except that the music was inferior, and altogether Sankey did not leave a favourable impression. Moody had great sincerity, earnestness, and good sense, with some American humour which he mostly keeps under restraint, but in matter is quite conventional and commonplace. Much the most remarkable thing is the congregation or rather audience."112&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hort's distaste for America may not be solely attributed to patriotism as much as to a tainting of his thinking by a touch of Communism. These facts are brought out in his continued correspondence with Rev. John Ellerton, circa 1850:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I have pretty well made up my mind to devote my three or four years up here to the study of this subject of Communism."113&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I can only say that it was through the region of pure politics that I myself approach Communism."114&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"To be without responsibility, to be in no degree our 'brother's keeper,' would be the heaviest curse imaginable."115&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Surely every man is meant to be God's steward of every blessing and 'talent' (power, wealth, influence, station, birth, etc. etc.) which He gives him, for the benefit of his neighbours."116&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also suspect is Hort's delving into the supernatural along with his good friend, Brooke Foss Westcott, and others in what was called the 'Ghostly Guild' (more on this later).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Westcott, Gorham, C.B., Scott, Benson, Bradshaw, Luard, etc., and I have started a society for the investigation of ghosts and all supernatural appearances and effects, being all disposed to believe that such things really exist, and ought to be discriminated from hoaxes and mere subjective delusions; we shall be happy to obtain any good accounts well authenticated with names. Westcott is drawing up a schedule of questions. Cope calls us the 'Cock and Bull Club;' our own temporary name is the 'Ghostly Guild.' "117&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then again, it is possible that the learned doctor was influenced by more than mere philosophy, as we see in his description of a hotel in the Alps where he often vacationed:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Pontresina, Hotel Krone; homely, but very clean and comfortable; ... beer excellent."118&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is not an amazing thing that any one man could hold to so many unscriptural and ungodly beliefs. It is amazing that such a man could be exalted by Bible believing preachers and professors to a point of authority higher than the King James Bible! Dr. Hort was a truly great Greek scholar, yet a great intellect does not make one an authority over the Bible when they themselves do not even claim to believe it! Albert Einstein was a man of great intellect, but he rejected Scripture, and so where he speaks on the subject of Scripture he is not to be accepted as authoritative. Possessing a great mind or great ability does not guarantee being a great spiritual leader. Dr. Hort was a scholar, but his scholarship alone is no reason to accept his theories concerning Bible truth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If fundamental pastors of today enlisted the services of an evangelist and found that this evangelist had beliefs paralleling those of Fenton John Anthony Hort, I believe that the pastor would cancel the meeting. Strangely through, when a pastor discovers such to be true about Dr. Hort, he excuses him as "a great Greek scholar" and presents his Authorized Version to him to be maliciously dissected and then discarded as Dr. Hort sets himself down in the seat of authority which the Bible once held. Here again I must assert that most often this is done with childlike faith on the part of the pastor, due to the education he received while in seminary. The seminary is not really guilty either, for they have simply and unsuspectingly accepted the authority of two men raised under the influence of a campaign by the Jesuits to re-Romanize England. Wilkenson reports that Hort had been influenced by these Roman Catholic forces: "Dr. Hort tell us that the writings of Simon had a large share in the movement to discredit the Textus Receptus class of MSS and Bibles." 119&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Problems with Westcott&lt;br /&gt;Unfortunately for the "new Bible" supporters, Dr. Westcott's credentials are even more anti-biblical. Westcott did not believe that Genesis 1-3 should be taken literally. He also thought that "Moses" and "David" were poetic characters whom Jesus Christ referred to by name only because the common people accepted them as authentic. Westcott states:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"No one now, I suppose, holds that the first three chapters of Genesis, for example, give a literal history - I could never understand how anyone reading them with open eyes could think they did - yet they disclose to us a Gospel. So it is probably elsewhere. Are we not going through a trial in regard to the use of popular language on literary subjects like that through which we went, not without sad losses in regard to the use of popular language on physical subjects? If you feel now that it was, to speak humanly, necessary that the Lord should speak of the 'sun rising,' it was no less necessary that he would use the names 'Moses' and 'David' as His contemporaries used them. There was no critical question at issue. (Poetry is, I think, a thousand times more true than History; this is a private parenthesis for myself alone.)" 120&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He also said "David" is not a chronological but a spiritual person. 121&lt;br /&gt;That the first three chapter of Genesis are all allegory has been believed by liberals and modernists for years. Do today's fundamentalists realize that those modernists' beliefs were nurtures in the heart of this Bible critic?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Westcott was also a doubter of the biblical account of miracles: "I never read an account of a miracle but I seem instinctively to feel its improbability, and discover somewhat of evidence in the account of it." 122 If a great fundamental preacher of our day were to make this statement, he would be called apostate, but what then of Westcott?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Westcott believed that the second coming of Jesus Christ was not a physical coming but a spiritual coming: "As far as I can remember, I said very shortly what I hold to be the 'Lord's coming' in my little book on the Historic Faith. I hold very strongly that the Fall of Jerusalem was the coming which first fulfilled the Lord's words; and, as there have been other comings, I cannot doubt that He is 'coming' to us now." 123&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Westcott's "Heaven"&lt;br /&gt;Wait! This fundamental doctrine is not the last one to be denied by Bishop Westcott, for he believed Heaven to be a state and not a literal place. Note the following quotations from Bishop Westcott: "No doubt the language of the Rubric is unguarded, but it saves us from the error of connecting the Presence of Christ's glorified humanity with place; 'heaven is a state and not a place.'" 124&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Yet the unseen is the largest part of life. Heaven lies about us now in infancy alone; and by swift, silent pauses for thought, for recollection, for aspiration, we cannot only keep fresh the influence of that diviner atmosphere, but breathe it more habitually." 125&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"We may reasonably hope, by patient, resolute, faithful, united endeavour to find heaven about us here, the glory of our earthly life." 126&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Westcott's "Newmanism"&lt;br /&gt;Dr. Westcott was also deeply devoted to John Newman, the Roman Catholic defector who took 150 Church of England clergymen with him when he made the change. Those of his disciples who did not make the physical change to Rome, made the spiritual change to Romanism, though many, like Westcott, never admitted it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In writing to his futue wife in 1852, Westcott wrote: "Today I have again taken up 'Tracts for the Times' and Dr. Newman. Don't tell me that he will do me harm. At least today he will, has done me good, and had you been here I should have asked you to read his solemn words to me. My purchase has already amply repaid me. I think I shall choose a volume for one of my Christmas companions." 127&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This was written after Newman had defected to Rome!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wilkenson adds, "By voice and pen, the teaching of Newman changed in the minds of many their attitude toward the Bible. Stanley shows us that the allegorizing of German theology, under whose influence Newman and the leaders of the movement were, was Origen's method of allegorizing. Newman contended that God never intended the Bible to teach doctrines."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Westcott also resented criticism of the Essays and Reviews. Upon hearing the Bishop of Manchester deride the apostate authors of these heretical essays, Westcott wrote, "But his language about the Essays and Reviews roused my indignation beyond expression." 128&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These are the convictions of a man greatly responsible for the destruction of Christian faith in the Greek Text of the Authorized Version. Place Mr. Westcott next to any present fundamental preacher or educator, and he would be judged a modernist, liberal and heretic. In spite of his outstanding ability in Greek, a man of his convictions would not be welcome on the campus of any truly Christian college in America. This is not an overstatement, nor is it malicious. The Christian colleges of today hold very high standards and simply would not settle for a man of such apostate conviction, no matter how great his ability to teach a given subject.&lt;br /&gt;Surprising Defense&lt;br /&gt;It is truly amazing that a man who believed things completely contrary to the convictions of today's fundamental preachers and educators could be exalted and defended by them. Of course, I believe this is done primarily because our fundamental brethren know little of what either Dr. Westcott or Dr. Hort really believed and taught.&lt;br /&gt;Westcott's Socialism&lt;br /&gt;This does not completely describe Brooke Foss Westcott, the man. He was a devout socialist and postmillenialist. Socialism and postmillenialism go hand in hand. Postmillenialism is the belief that we shall bring in the millenial reign of Christ ourselves, without Christ's help. Socialism is usually the means of establishing that thousand-year reign of peace.&lt;br /&gt;A postmillenialist would see a spiritual "coming" of Christ at any great event which drew the world closer to his idea of peace. It is also easy to see why he would believe that a "heaven" was attainable down here, i.e., Westcott's statement: "We may reasonably hope, by patient, resolute, faithful, united endeavour, to find heaven about us here, the glory of our earthly life."&lt;br /&gt;These are only two small glimmers of the socialistic light which burned in Westcott's breast. If they were all of the evidence available, it would make for a weak case indeed. They are not!&lt;br /&gt;Dr. Westcott's "pacifist" nature shows early in his life. He was known as a "shy, nervous, thoughtful boy" while attending school. His hobbies were as follows: "He used his leisure chiefly in sketching, arranging his collections of ferns, butterflies, and moths, and in reading books of natural history or poetry." 129&lt;br /&gt;He developed an interest in social reform early on. He was known about his school for talking about things "which very few schoolboys talk about - points of theology, problems of morality, and the ethics of politics." 130&lt;br /&gt;His son, Arthur, describes him with these words: "As a boy my father took keen interest in the Chartist movement, and the effect then produced upon his youthful imagination by the popular presentation of the sufferings of the masses never faded. His diary shows how he deserted his meals to be present at various stirring scenes, and in particular to listen to the oratory of 'the great agitator,' presumably Feargus O'Connor himself. He would often in later years speak of these early impressions, which served in no small degree to keep alive his intense hatred of every form of injustice and oppression. He even later disapproved of his father's fishing excursions, because his sympathies were so entirely on the side of the fish. On one occasion, being then a little boy, he was carrying a fish-basket, when his father put a live fish into it, and later in life he used to declare that he would still feel the struggles of that fish against his back."131&lt;br /&gt;(The Chartist movement was a campaign for social reform in England from 1838-1848.)&lt;br /&gt;This one paragraph reveals the temperament which could describe Westcott for the rest of his life:&lt;br /&gt;He was ever in favor of any social reform, at any cost, as he himself stated in speaking of the French Revolution: "The French Revolution has been a great object of interest. I confess to a strong sympathy with the republicans. Their leaders at least have been distinguished by great zeal and sincerity. Lamartine, who I fancy you know by name, quite wins my admiration."132&lt;br /&gt;Westcott's Poetical Influences&lt;br /&gt;Westcott was ever a lover of poetry and was deeply influenced by its message. This explains his admiration of Alphonse de Lamartine. Lamartine was a French poet whose writings helped influence the French people into revolution. Ironically, but I am sure not coincidentally, Lamartine had studied under the Jesuits.&lt;br /&gt;He is a fool who thinks a poet's pen is not a mighty weapon!&lt;br /&gt;Westcott's romantic attitude explains why he would make the statement that, "Poetry is, I think, a thousand times more true than history."&lt;br /&gt;It also explains his susceptibility to the subtle Romanizing influence of the poet Keble. Westcott had a fondness for poetry and an unusual fondness for Keble's poetry. No poet is mentioned more often in his writings than Keble.&lt;br /&gt;Westcott writes concerning Keble, "But I intend reading some Keble, which has been a great delight to me during the whole week, and perhaps that will now be better than filling you with all my dark, dark, dark gloominess."133&lt;br /&gt;It seems Keble's poetry inspired Westcott to see that the Church of England needed to make a change.&lt;br /&gt;"I have been reading Keble for the day, and though I do not recollect noticing the hymn particularly before, it now seems to me one of the most beautiful and especially does it apply to those feelings which so often described to you: that general sorrow and despair which we feel when we look at the state of things around us and try to picture the results which soon must burst upon our Church and country."134&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Westcott found time to quote Keble to express his feelings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"On these look long and well, Cleansing thy sight by prayer and faith, And thou shalt know what secret spell Preserves them in their living death."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"That hymn of Keble's contains very, very much. You have read it again and again now, I am sure, and understand it."135&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Westcott's Romanism&lt;br /&gt;That Keble formed in Westcott a passive attitude toward Christianity's arch-enemy, Rome, is evident by his reaction to a sermon condemning Popery: "As for Mr. Oldham's meetings, I think they are not good in their tendency, and nothing can be so bad as making them the vehicle of controversy. What an exquisitely beautiful verse is that of Keble's, 'And yearns not her parental heart,' etc. We seem now to have lost all sense of pity in bitterness and ill-feeling. Should not our arm against Rome be prayer and not speeches; the efforts of our inmost heart, and not the display of secular reason?"136&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It has been often stated that "You are what you read." Westcott's constant exposure to pro-Roman influences set a pattern for his thinking, even though he may not have been aware of it. Westcott even refused to abandon Keble as his writings became more obviously Popish.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Keble has lately published some sermons in which, as well as in a preface on 'the position of Churchmen,' I am afraid he will offend many. I can in some measure sympathize with him."137&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Remembering the hatred Westcott had for what he considered "injustice and oppression," and his submission to the programming poetry of Keble, we find him slipping farther away from a truly biblical stand after hearing another pro-Roman speaker, Maurice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"See Maurice's new lectures, with a preface on development written apparently with marvelous candour and fairness, and free from all controversial bitterness. He makes a remark which I have often written and said, that the danger of our Church is from atheism, not Romanism. What a striking picture is that he quotes from Newman of the present aspect of the Roman Church - as despised, rejected, persecuted in public opinion."138&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This constant barrage of Romanizing influences caused Westcott to incorporate many Roman Catholic practices into his thinking.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In February of 1849 he decided to investigate two favorite subjects of the Romanizers: "Inspiration -- Apostolical Succession. May I inquire on all these topics with simple sincerity, seeking only the truth!"139&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The result of the first study led to Westcott's believing the Bible to be absolutely true, but he refused to call it infallible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"My dear Hort - I am glad to have seen both your note and Lightfoot's - glad too that we have had such an opportunity of openly speaking. For I too must disclaim setting forth infallibility in the front of my convictions. All I hold is, that the more I learn, the more I am con- vinced that fresh doubts come from my own ignorance, and that at present I find the pre- sumption in favor of the absolute truth - I reject the word infallibility - of Holy Scripture overwhelming."140&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Our good Bishop has now lost the conviction that Scripture is "infallible." We are never told the result of his study of the Roman Catholic teaching of "Apostolic Succession."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Westcott's Iconism&lt;br /&gt;Westcott also had an affinity for statues since his poetic spirit had the ability to read a great deal into that which he saw.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Our Cathedral buildings at Peterborough are far from rich in works of sculpture, but among the works which we have there are two which have always seemed to me to be of the deepest interest. The one is a statue of a Benedictine monk, which occupies a niche in the gateway built by Godfrey of Croyland about 1308; the other is an effigy of an unknown abbot of considerably earlier date, carved upon the slab which once covered his grave, and which now lies in the south aisle of the choir. They are widely different in character and significance. The statue of the monk, which Flaxman took as an illustration of his lectures on sculpture, is one of the noblest of medieval figures. The effigy of the abbot has no artistic merit whatever. But both alike are studies from life; and together they seem to me to bring very vividly before us the vital power of early monasticism in England."141&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Jesuit plan is to introduce the ways of Rome into the minds of Protestants and familiarize them with the "High Church" atmosphere. Then, little by little, allow these Roman ideas to intertwine themselves with the worship service. Dr. Wylie aptly describes the plan:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Tract 90, where the doctrine of reserves is broached, bears strong marks of a Jesuit origin. Could we know all the secret instructions given to the leaders in the Puseyite movement, the mental reservations prescribed to them, we might well be astonished. 'Go gently,' we think we hear the great Roothan say to them. 'Remember the motto of our dear son, the cidevant Bishop Autun, "surtout, pas trop de zele"(above all, not too much zeal). Bring into view, little by little, the authority of the church. If you can succeed in rendering it equal to that of the Bible, you have done much. Change the table of the Lord into an altar; elevate that altar a few inches above the level of the floor; gradually turn around to it when you read the Liturgy; place lighted tapers upon it; teach the people the virtues of stained glass, and cause them to feel the majesty of Gothic basilisques. Introduce first the dogmas, beginning with that of baptismal regeneration; next the ceremonies and sacraments, as penance and the confessional; and lastly, the images of the Virgin and the saints'."142&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This trend was quite apparent in the unsuspecting mind of Bishop Westcott. "I do not say that baptism is absolutely necessary, though from the words of Scripture I can see no exception, but I do not think we have no right to exclaim against the idea of the commencement of a spiritual life, conditionally from baptism, any more than we have to deny the commencement of a moral life from birth."143&lt;br /&gt;"Dear Mr. Perrott - I had sketched out a plan in my mind for the windows in the chancel at Somersham which I should have been glad to carry out, but now, as you know, my connection with the parish has practically ceased, and in a few weeks will formally cease. My wish was to have a figure of John the Baptist opposite that of the Virgin, to represent the Old Dispensation, and to have the work executed by Heaton and Butler, who executed the window for Mr. Mason."144&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Westcott's Purgatory&lt;br /&gt;These Romanistic leanings eventually led Westcott into allowing the practice of "prayers for the dead." In writing to a clergyman in August of 1900 concerning this Roman Catholic practice which had found its way into an Anglican church, HE STATED, "I considered very carefully, in conference with some other bishops of large knowledge and experience, the attitude of our church with regard to prayers for the dead. We agreed unanimously that we are, as things are now, forbidden to pray for the dead apart from the whole church in our public services. No restriction is placed upon private devotions."145 (Emphasis his.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Notice that the Bishop advised against prayers for the dead in "public service," but he did not even attempt to discourage the practice in "private devotions!" Would one of today's fundamental preachers who have such high regard for the Westcott and Hort Greek Text respond in the same manner? Would we hear one of our Bible-believing brethren confront the matter with, 'Well, we don't practice prayers for the dead here in our services, but if you want to do it in your private devotions, it's okay.' NEVER! We are to hate the garment "spotted by the flesh." (Jude 23.) Dr. Westcott's garment is spotted to the point of resembling a leopard's skin! Are we to expect an unbiased rendering of the Greek Text by a man whose convictions would rival Jerome's in loyalty to Roman teaching? I trow not!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But to allow prayers for the dead would be futile if there were only heaven and hell. The "dead" in heaven would need no prayers, and the "dead" in hell would be beyond hope.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Benjamin Wilkenson provides the missing link in Westcott's chain of Romanism when commenting on the Revised Version translation of John 14:2:&lt;br /&gt;King James: "In my Father's house are many mansions."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Revised: "In my Father's house are many abiding places." (margin) "In the following quotation from the Expositor, the writer points out that, by the marginal reading of the Revised, Dr. Westcott and the Committee referred, not to a final future state, but to intermediate stations in the future before the final one.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Dr. Westcott in his Commentary of St. John's Gospel gives the following explanation of the words. 'In my Father's house are many mansions. The rendering comes from the Vulgate mansiones, which were resting places, and especially the stations on a great road, where travelers found refreshment. This appears to be the true meaning of the Greek word here; so that the contrasted notions of repose and progress are combined in this vision of the future.'&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"'For thirty years now,' said Dr. Samuel Cox, in 1886, 'I have been preaching what is called the larger hope, through good and ill report.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The larger hope meant a probation after this life, such a time of purifying, by fire or otherwise, after death as would insure another opportunity of salvation to all men. Dr. Cox, like others, rejoices that the changes in the Revised Version sustain this doctrine. 'Had the new version been in our hands, I should not have felt any special gravity in the assertion,' he said. Doctors Westcott and Hort, both Revisers, believed this larger hope." (This Roman Catholic translation also appears in the NASV).146&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Considering the Romanistic ideals which Dr. Westcott possessed, it is no surprise that his close friend and companion, Dr. Hort, would compare him to, of all people, the Roman Catholic defector, John Newman! "It is hard to resist a vague feeling that Westcott's going to Peterborough will be the beginning of a great movement in the church, less conspicuous but not less powerful, than that which proceeded from Newman."147&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also seems not surprising that Westcott would call the Jesuit inspired Oxford Movement, "the Oxford Revival!" "The Oxford Revival in the middle of the century, quickened anew that sense of corporate life. But the evangelical movement touched only a part of human interest."148&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Westcott's Mariolatry&lt;br /&gt;Another Roman Catholic doctrine is the adoration of Mary. Here also Dr. Westcott did not let the Roman Catholic Church down, as he reveals in a letter to his fiancee Sarah Louisa Whittard.&lt;br /&gt;"After leaving the monastery, we shaped our course to a little oratory which we discovered on the summit of a neighboring hill ... Fortunately we found the door open. It is very small, with one kneeling-place, and behind a screen was a 'Pieta' the size of life (i.e., a Virgin and dead Christ) ... Had I been alone, I could have knelt there for hours."149&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This condition is also indicated by his son, Arthur, in describing Westcott's reaction to the painting "The Sistine Madonna:"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"It is smaller than I expected, and the colouring is less rich, but in expression it is perfect. The face of the virgin is unspeakably beautiful. I looked till the lip seemed to tremble with intensity of feeling - of feeling simply, for it would be impossible to say whether it be awe of joy or hope - humanity shrinking before the divine, or swelling with its conscious possession. It is enough that there is deep, intensely deep, emotion such as the mother of the Lord may have had."150&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The intensity of Westcott's admiration for Christ's mother is best revealed by his desire to change his fiancee's name to "Mary" as Arthur explains: "My mother, whose name was Sarah Louisa Whittard, was the eldest of three sisters. She afterwards, at the time of her confirmation at my father's request, took the name of Mary in addition."151&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The above examples illustrate Dr. Westcott's strong Roman Catholic leanings. Again I must say that I do not believe that if a man lived today with the convictions we have just studied, that he would be welcome in a fundamental pulpit anywhere in America, be his name Bishop Wescott or Hort or Schuler or any other.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Westcott's Communal Living&lt;br /&gt;Few of Bishop Westcott's Twentieth Century supporters know the true thoughts and intents of his heart. If they did, they would know that he was an advocate of communal living! Let the record speak for itself.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;His son, Arthur, stated in his book, Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"In later years of his Harrow residence (approximately 1868) my father was very full of the idea of a 'Coenobium.' (Arthur's footnote for the word 'Coenobium' states simply, 'community life.') Every form of luxury was to him abhorrent, and he viewed with alarm the increasing tendency amongst all classes of society to encourage extravagant display and wasteful self-indulgence. His own extreme simplicity of life is well-known to all his friends. He looked to the family and not the individual for the exhibition of the simple life. His views upon this subject are accessible to all who care to study them. I only wish to put it on record that he was very much in earnest in this matter and felt that he had not done all he might have for its furtherance."152&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the idea of the Coenobium, Bishop Westcott's socialism bordered very close to communism as we see by his own description of what a Coenobium was to be.&lt;br /&gt;"It would consist primarily of an association of families, bound together by common principles of life, of work, of devotion, subject during the time of voluntary co-operation to central control, and united by definite obligations. Such a corporate life would be best realized under the conditions of collegiate union with the hall and schools and chapel, with a common income, though not common property, and an organized government; but the sense of fellowship and the power of sympathy, though they would be largely developed by these, would yet remain vigorous whenever and in whatever form combination in the furtherance of the general ends was possible. Indeed, complete isolation from the mass of society would defeat the very objects of the institution. These objects - the conquest of luxury, the disciplining of intellectual labor, the consecration of every fragment of life by religious exercises - would be expressed in a threefold obligation; an obligation to poverty, an obligation to study, and obligation to devotion."158 (Emphasis mine.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Little did the esteemed professor realize that the college students of a hundred years later would be more than happy to turn his dream into a reality!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Arthur viewed the establishment of the Coenobium with much fear and trembling. They were assured of its future reality quite often.&lt;br /&gt;"My own recollections of the Coenobium are very vivid. Whenever we children showed signs of greediness or other selfishness, we were assured that such things would be unheard of in the Coenobium. There the greedy would have no second portions of desirable puddings. We should not there be allowed a choice of meats, but should be constrained to take which was judged to be best for us. We viewed the establishment of the Coenobium with gloomy apprehension, not quite sure whether it was within the bounds of practical politics or not. I was myself inclined to believe that it really was coming and that we, with the Bensons (maybe) and Horts and a few other families, would find ourselves living in a community life. I remember confiding to a younger brother that I had overheard some conversation which convinced me that the Coenobium was an event of the immediate future, and that a site had been selected for it in Northamptonshire; I even pointed out Peterborough on the map."154&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a letter to his old college friend, Dr. E.W. Benson, dated November 24, 1868, Dr. Westcott states his regrets that the Coenobium had not yet been established, and wonders if he wouldn't have done better to have pursued the matter further.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"My dear Benson - alas! I feel most deeply that I ought not to speak one word about the Coenobium. One seems to be entangled in the affairs of life. The work must be for those who have a fresh life to give. Yet sometimes I think that I have been faithless to call which might have grown distinct if I had listened."155&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Two years later he was still promoting the idea through articles in a periodical entitled "Contemporary," as he explains in another letter to Benson dated, March 21, 1870:&lt;br /&gt;"...the paper on the Coenobium will appear, I think, in the next number of the 'Contemporary.' It was a trial to me not to send it to you and Lightfoot and Wordsworth for criticism, but on the whole I thought it best to venture for myself, and speak simply what I feel. If anything is to come of the idea it will be handled variously, and something is gained even by incompleteness. On the true reconciliation of classes I have said a few words which are, I hope, intelligible."156&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Young Arthur's naive sounding prediction in 1868 of the establishing of such a Coenobium in Peterborough, two years later (1870) seemed almost prophetic. In December of 1868, Dr. Westcott became Examining Chaplain in the Diocese of Peterborough! Just prior to the move, he wrote Benson, "The Coenobium comes at least one step nearer."157&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Arthur's fears seemed somewhat realized.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The move to Peterborough was a great venture of faith on my father's part. He had a large family to educate, and yet he exchanged the comparative opulence of a Harrow house master for the precarious income attached to a canonry in an impoverished Chapter. Our manner of life was already adapted to the idea of the Coenobium in its strict simplicity, so the only luxury that could be abolished was meat for breakfast, which however, was retained as a Sunday treat."158&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thus we see a side of Dr. Westcott which is not too publicized by his followers, yet it was there nonetheless. In addition to his desire to see the Authorized Version replaced, a Romanized Church of England, and the establishment of college Coenobium, he had one other great driving force, the abolition of war.&lt;br /&gt;Westcott's Peace-Movement&lt;br /&gt;No true Christian loves war. A Bible believer takes the premillenial view and realizes that war is caused by the sinful nature of mankind - James 4:1. He understands that this will all be changed at Christ's return - Philippians 3:21.&lt;br /&gt;A Bible rejector who has chosen the postmillenial viewpoint cannot allow himself to believe that mankind is bad. He must find a way to show that man is basically good. All men must be brothers in his eyes. "Brothers," he assumes, will just naturally work toward peace.&lt;br /&gt;Westcott, a postmillenial socialist, had this to say concerning the "brotherhood" of man in regard to instituting "peace on earth."&lt;br /&gt;"Christianity rests upon the central fact that the Word became flesh. This fact establishes not only a brotherhood of men, but also a brotherhood of nations; for history has shown that nations are an element in the fulfillment of the Divine counsel, by which humanity advances toward its appointed end."159&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What should these "brothers" do to help establish "peace on earth?" We can at once recognize the part which the Christian society is called upon to take with regard to three great measures which tend to peace - meditation, arbitration, and (ultimately) disarmament - and at least silently work for them.160&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Combine action, in any ways possible, for the bringing about of a simultaneous reduction of the armaments."161&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Once again the Cambridge professor is ahead of his time. "Disarmament" has been the cry of liberal, pro-Communist college students for two decades. Strange it is that as the "peace" movement of the 1960's was led by a "minister" with the exact same philosophy about world peace!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Westcott wanted an "arbitration board" made up of the "Christian society" to decide international policy concerning disarmament quotas. He first envisioned England and the United States submitting to this idea, assuming then that the rest of the world would be forced to follow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The United States and England are already bound so closely together by their common language and common descent, that an Arbitration Treaty which shall exclude the thought of war - a civil war - between them seems to be within measurable distance. When once the general principle of arbitration has been adopted by two great nations, it cannot but be that the example will be followed, and then, at last, however remote the vision may seem, disarmament will be a natural consequence of the acceptance of a rational and legal method of settling national disputes."162&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Westcott even felt that world peace would be worth an "Ecumenical Movement."&lt;br /&gt;"Other cognate subjects were touched upon -- the proposed Permanent Treaty of Arbitration between the United States and Great Britain, the significance of war as extreme outcome of that spirit of selfish competition which follows from the acceptance of a material standard of well being, the desirability of seeking cooperation with the movement on the part of the Roman and Greek Churches -- but it seemed best to confine immediate action to a single point on which there was complete agreement."163&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He assumed that "world peace" was of the utmost importance.&lt;br /&gt;"The proposal to work for the simultaneous reduction of European armament is definite, and deals with an urgent peril. Such a disarmament would secure the lasting and honourable peace which the leaders of Europe have shown lately, once and again, that they sincerely desire. We are all sensible of the difficulties by which the question of disarmament is beset, but we cannot admit that they are insuperable."164&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All this was to be done, of course, in the name of Christ. Westcott felt that he was simply trying to bring to pass Luke 2:14. He truly considered himself a man with whom God was "pleased," as that verse had been mistranslated in the Revised Version.&lt;br /&gt;"The question of international relations has not hitherto been considered in the light of the Incarnation, and till this has been done, I do not see that we can look for the establishment of that peace which was heralded at the Nativity."165&lt;br /&gt;So here we have a man who doubted the miracles which Christ performed.&lt;br /&gt;"I never read an account of a miracle, but I seem instinctively to feel its improbability, and discover some what of evidence in the account of it."166&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even though he doubted Jesus Christ's miracles, he didn't doubt that a Roman Catholic priest could perform them, as he explains what he saw in France at "Our Lady of La Salette" shrine.&lt;br /&gt;"A written narrative can convey no notion of the effect of such a recital. The eager energy of the father, the modest thankfulness of the daughter, the quick glances of the spectators from one to the other, the calm satisfaction of the priest, the comments of look and nod, combined to form a scene which appeared hardly to belong to the nineteenth century. An age of faith was restored before our sight in its ancient guise. We talked about the cures to a young layman who had throughout showed us singular courtesy. When we remarked upon the peculiar circumstances by which they were attended, his own comment was: 'Sans croire, comment l'expliquer?' (translated: 'Without believing how can it be explained?') And in this lay the real significance and power of the place."167&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We have a man who could read and exalt a Jesuit-inspired poet, Keble, but when it came to reading anything that presented Rome in a negative light, such as Fox's Book of Martyrs, he said, "I never read any of Fox's book."168&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He was a man who claimed, "I cannot myself reconcile the spirit of controversy and that of Christian faith."169&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since controversy was "un-Christian," he refused to answer John Burgon's arguments concerning the Local Text of Alexandria which Westcott helped exalt. He simply said, "I cannot read Mr. Burgon yet. A glance at one or two sentences leads me to think that his violence answers himself."170&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is a sad thing that Westcott's prejudice closed his mind to Burgon's comments. Burgon was harsh, but Burgon was correct. Time has since proven that. It is a dangerous spirit which ignores a man's FACTS just because of a "holier than thou" attitude which teaches that "anyone who is right, must be gentlemanly." Had more people in the late 1800's looked past Burgon's harsh comments and examined his FACTS, Christianity would be richer today.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We have in Brooke Foss Westcott a man who believed in communal living; a man who believed that the second coming of Christ was spiritual, heaven was a state of mind, prayers for the dead were permissable in private devotions, and that Christ came to bring peace through international disarmament. He believed in purgatory and admiration for Mary, and he thought the Bible was like any other book. This is the man who walked into the Revision Committee and sat in judgment of our Bible. He thought he saw room for improvement in the Authorized Version and offered a pro-Roman Greek text with which to correct it. The ironic thing is that Bible-believing Christian educators and preachers, who would never agree with his theology, have for years exalted his opinion of the Greek as nearly infallible. These facts alone should be reason enough to condemn Westcott and Hort, their Greek Text and the MSS which they used to arrive at such a text. But let us look at their actions concerning the molesting of the pure words of the King James Bible, in favor of Rome. Saddest of all, we have in Brooke Foss Westcott a man who neither believed in salvation by grace nor ever experienced it. There is no record in his "Life and Letters" that he ever accepted Christ as his personal Saviour. In a letter to his then future wife, he stated strongly his feelings concerning "baptism."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"My dearest Mary - I quite forget whether we have ever talked upon the subject alluded to in my last note - Baptismal Regeneration - but I think we have, for it is one of the few points on which I have clear views, and which is, I am sure, more misunderstood and misrepresented than any other. Do not we see that God generally employs means. I will not say exclusively, that He has appointed an outward Church as the receptacle of His promises, and outward rites for admission in to it, and thus for being placed in a relation with Him by which we may receive His further grace; for till we are so connected by admission into His outward Church, we have no right to think that he will convey to us the benefits of his spiritual Church, when we have neglected the primary means which He provides. It does not, of course, follow that the outward and spiritual churches are co-extensive, that all who have been placed in relation with God by Baptism, and so made heirs of heaven conditionally, will avail themselves of that relation to fulfill those conditions - and here lies the ambiguity: because a child is born again into the Church of God, as he has been born into the world before, people seem to conclude that he must discharge all the duties of his new station, which in temporal matters we know he does not. By birth he may, if he will, truly live here; by baptism he may if he will, truly live forever. I do not say that Baptism is absolutely necessary, though from the word of the Scripture I can see no exception, but I do think we have a right to exclaim against the idea of the commencement of a spiritual life, conditionally from Baptism, any more than we have to deny the commencement of a moral life from birth."171&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As has already been established, both Drs. Westcott and Hort were hostile to the true Greek text of the King James Bible. Dr. Westcott has been unconsciously influenced into a pro-Roman Catholic attitude. It must also be pointed out that earlier Dr. Hort had been a student of Dr. Westcott's, as Arthur Westcott points out: "Another of Westcott's private pupils was F.J.A. Hort."172&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The meticulous care with which he taught his pupils is noted by Dr. Whewell, Master of Trinity at the time, "The pains he bestows upon his pupils here (private pupils) is unparalleled, and his teaching is judicious as well as careful."173&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The common desire of these two Cambridge scholars was to eliminate the authority of the Universal Greek Text of the King James Bible. Scholars had long sought to do this, but were baffled by the obvious evidence testifying that the Universal Text was indeed the true text of the Bible, and in that, a preservation of the original autographs. These scholars, subtly influenced by Rome, knew that their duty was to overthrow this pure, Protestant, Christ-honoring text and replace it with the Local Text of Alexandria, Egypt, but the overwhelming evidence was always weighted in God's favor. No one, even the Roman Catholic Church, could find a way to explain why 95% of all extant MSS belonged to the Universal Text. "Textual criticism" was at a standstill until this roadblock could be circumvented.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hort's Fiction&lt;br /&gt;It was the genius of Fenton John Anthony Hort which rode to the rescue of the forlorn Roman Catholic text. This man used the same method to overthrow the authority of the Universal Text that Charles Darwin used to overthrow the fact of creation. He used a THEORY!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;His theory was that the "originals" agreed with the Local Text, and that this Local Text was "edited" by the Syrian church at Antioch in the Fourth Century to become what we know as the Universal Text, and then forced upon the people by the church council.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just as was true for Darwin, common sense, all available facts, and the nature of God testified against his theory. Just as Darwin did, he collected minute scraps of evidence, then twisted and magnified his evidence, and theorized that he was right. Just as Darwin did, his theory was manufactured in his head, and INDEPENDENT of historical facts and evidence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just as Darwin, his theory was overwhelmingly accepted by the overeducated men of his day who were looking for a way of overthrowing God's authority. The theory of evolution was music to the ears of scientists, biologists, and college professors who resented the thought of creation. The sound of "God did it; that settles it" just naturally mustered all of the animosity and rebellion that is resident in the human flesh (Romans 7:18). When Darwin issued his theory to the world, the world was happy to believe the lie.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same thing was true of Christian scholarship. They had long resented the thought that God could or would preserve His Word without their help. Like the lost scientists, they begrudgingly had to acknowledge that the evidence and facts of history were in favor of the Authorized Version. The issuing of Hort's theory, with the backing of Dr. Westcott, was heralded as the "liberation" of textual criticism. Dr. Alfred Martin explains the delight of liberals which existed upon learning of Hort's theory:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Men who had long denied the infallibility of the Bible - and there are many such in the Church of England and in the independent churches - eagerly acclaimed a theory which they thought to be in harmony with their position.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"At precisely the time when liberalism was carrying the field in the English churches the theory of Westcott and Hort received wide acclaim. These are not isolated facts. Recent contributions of the subject - that is, in the present century - following mainly the Westcott-Hort principles have been made largely by men who deny the inspiration of the Bible."174&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Like Darwin's theory, different viewpoints using his theory arrived at different conclusions. This, Dr. Martin records, Hort knew: "Hort freely admits this and concedes that 'in dealing with this kind of evidence equally competent as to the same variations'."175&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course, the fact of different conclusions did not hamper Hort's followers. They were not interested in establishing a new conclusion. They were interested in abolishing an old one, i.e., that the King James Bible is the Word and the words of God.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A textual critic is not like a man driving an automobile to a destination which only he knows. He is more like a little child standing behind the wheel who doesn't particularly care where he goes, just as long as HE is doing the driving. Dr. Martin exposed this tendency: "Their principle method, an extreme reliance upon the internal evidence of readings, is fallacious and dangerous, because it makes the mind of the critic the arbiter of the text of the Word of God."176&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The feeling of power, to be the judge of God's Word, coupled with the old nature which exists in the flesh of all men, even in Christian scholars, becomes overwhelming to the mind. As Paul stated in Romans 7:18, "For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh), dwelleth no good thing; for to will is present with me, but how to perform that which is good I find not." Jeremiah concluded in chapter 17, verse 9, "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked; who can know it?" Even a saved man has bad flesh. Give this flesh the authority to change God's Word, and he will soon plant himself on God's throne. As it has been said "Put a beggar on horseback, and he will ride off at a gallop."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Scholarly Prejudice&lt;br /&gt;Another similarity between Hort's theory and Darwin's theory is that it is still held in high esteem long after it has been disproven. Darwin's theory has long ago suffered irreparable damage by historical evidence, the Word of God, and of course common sense. Yet, scientists have doggedly upheld it as reliable. This is not done because they feel that Darwin's theory will ever lead them to the truth, but because Darwin's theory leads them away from the authority they so detest, the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hort's theory has been just as ill-handled by the truth, as Dr. Kurt Aland points out:&lt;br /&gt;"We still live in the world of Westcott and Hort with our conception of different recensions and text-types, although this conception has lost its raison de'etre, or, it needs at least to be newly and convincingly demonstrated. For the increase of the documentary evidence and the entirely new areas of research which were opened to us on the discovery of the papyri, mean the end of Westcott and Hort's conception."177&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dr. Jacob Geerlings, who has extensively studied the manuscript evidence of the New Testament, states concerning the Universal Text:&lt;br /&gt;"Its origins as well as those of other so-called text-types probably go back to the autographs. It is now abundantly clear that the Eastern Church never officially adopted or recognized a received or authorized text and only by a long process of slow evolution did the Greek text of the New Testament undergo the various changes that we can dimly see in the few extant uncial codices identified with the Byzantine (i.e. Majority) Text."178&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dr. David Otis Fuller concludes, "Thus the view popularized by Westcott and Hort before the turn-of- the-century, that the Majority Text issued from an authorative ecclesiastical revision of the Greek text, is widely abandoned as no longer tenable."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As previously quoted, Dr. Martin has stated, "The trend of scholars in more recent years has been away from the original Westcott-Hort position."179&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In spite of new evidence, historical facts, and God's continued blessing of the Authorized Version, Christian scholars still exalt the theory as though it were the truth. This is not done because they feel that Hort's theory will eventually lead them to the true Word of God. Any honest, "Christian" scholar today who upholds Hort's outmoded theory will be glad to tell you that there is no perfect translation of "the Bible" in English today. They will admonish each new translation as "a step in the right direction," but even the newest translation is not without errors. This attitude is due to the fact that man's human nature resents the idea that God could preserve His words without the help of "good, godly Christians," and from the natural resistance of men to be in subjection to God. The supporters of Westcott and Hort possess a loyalty which borders on cultic, as Dr. Martin again has faithfully pointed out:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The theory was hailed by many when it came forth as practically final, certainly definitive. It has been considered by some the acme in textual criticism of the New Testament. Some of the followers of Westcott and Hort have been almost unreasoning in their devotion to the theory; and many people, even today, who have no idea what the Westcott-Hort theory is, or at best only a vague notion, accept the labors of those two scholars without question. During the past seventy years it has often been considered textual heresy to deviate from their position or to intimate that, sincere as they undoubtedly were, they may have been mistaken."180&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This cultic bent was even observed by Hort's friend, Professor Armitage Robinson, in 1891 who stated that a "kind of cult" had sprung up around the venerated old scholar.181&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
